Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Chet Taylor”
State v. Chet M. Lofgrenpublic domain
KIDD, Justice. Appellee Chet M. Lofgren stands accused of making an alcoholic beverage available to a minor. See Tex. Alco.Bev.Code Ann. § 106.06 (West Supp. 2000). Lofgren filed a motion to suppress evidence, which was granted following a *168 hearing. The State appeals.
In the Matter of the Estate of Betty Hamilton Lake, Deceased: Chet H. Lake, Jr. v. Mary Lake Chesnuttpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-IA-00037-SCT IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF BETTY HAMILTON LAKE, DECEASED: CHET H. LAKE, JR. v. MARY LAKE CHESNUTT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/08/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CYNTHIA L. BREWER TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DAVID W. DOGAN, III O. STEPHEN MONTAGNET, III
Blue Island, Inc. v. Taylorpublic domain
706 S.W.2d 668 (1985) BLUE ISLAND, INC., Appellant, v. Carole June TAYLOR, Appellee. No. 13-85-053-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. December 12, 1985. Rehearing Denied January 9, 1986. *669 Chet L. Wheless, Jr., Dallas, for appellant. James E. Shepherd, Richardson, for appellee. Before
CareFirst, Inc. v. Taylorpublic domain
MEMORANDUM Catherine C, Blake, United States District Judge Plaintiffs CareFirst, Inc. (“CareFirst”), CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. (“CareFirst *729Maryland”), and Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. (“GHMSI”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) have brought an action for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that certain administrative o
Mathstar, Inc. v. Tiberius Capital II, LLCpublic domain
712 F.Supp.2d 870 (2010) MATHSTAR, INC., Feltl and Company, Inc., Sajan, Inc., Perkins Capital Management, Inc., Richard C. Perkins, Merrill A. McPeak, Benno G. Sand, John C. Feltl, and Joseph P. Sullivan, Plaintiffs, v. TIBERIUS CAPITAL II, LLC, Defendant. Civil No. 09-2869 ADM/SRN. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 26, 2010.
Forest-Kohl v. Kohlpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The former wife, Yulia Forest-Kohl, appeals the final judgment of dissolution, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred in failing to designate her credit card and student loan debt as either marital or non-marital liabilities and allocate them accordingly in the final distribution of marital assets and liabilities. The former wife presented evidence that she accumulated both credit card debt an
Koski v. Koskipublic domain
CIKLIN, J. The former husband appeals an order denying his supplemental petition for modification of alimony. Because we are unable to determine if the trial court considered all applicable section 61.08(2) factors before concluding that the former husband’s alimony obligation should remain unchanged despite a substantial increase in the former wife’s earnings, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Cole Taylor Bank v. Ratner (In Re Ratner)public domain
146 B.R. 211 (1992) In re Milton D. RATNER, Debtor. COLE TAYLOR BANK, an Illinois State Chartered Bank, Plaintiff, v. Milton D. RATNER; Alexander S. Knopfler, Interim Trustee; Carrier Distribution Credit Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Altheimer & Gray, a partnership; Evanston Bank, as Trustee under Trust Agreement Number 1294; Richard E. Friedman; Marjorie L. Friedman; Joseph Greene; John Hopkins; Stella Klabacka; Patrick Athy; Patr
M.N., Jr. the Father v. Department of Children And Families and Guardian Ad Litem Programpublic domain
PER CURIAM. M.N., the Father, appeals the order dismissing his second motion to set aside a final judgment of adoption. We affirm. The Father’s biological child was born to a marriage between the mother and the legal father. After the parental rights of the mother and the legal father were terminated, a relative adopted the child. The Father moved to se
Berry v. Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs-Appellants Dorsey Berry, Bryan Sprayberry, Chet McDonnell, Tommy Stephens, Parrish Carlyle, Bobby Parker, and Connie Taylor *806have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s order dated May 16, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms that order granting summary judgment in favor of Def
Lund v. Chemical Bankpublic domain
OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Chemical Bank (“Chemical”) has moved pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for entry of judgment in its favor in accordance with the opinion dated February 16, 1990, which granted its motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Lund’s, Inc. (“LI”) has renewed its motion for reconsideration of the February 16 opinion. For the following reaso
In Re Martinezpublic domain
46 Cal.4th 945 (2009) In re OMAR FUENTES MARTINEZ on Habeas Corpus. No. S141480. Supreme Court of California. June 29, 2009. *948 Chet L. Taylor and Sandra L. Babcock for Petitioner Omar Fuentes Martinez. Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys Ge
296 B.R. 505 (2003) In re ENRON CORP., Debtor. Citigroup, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Pacific Investment Management Co., LLC, et al., Appellees. Citigroup, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. OCM Opportunities Fund III, L.P., et al., Appellees. Nos. SACV 03-306-GLT, CV-03-1820, Adversary Nos. AD02-2084(JB), AD02-2927(AA). United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division.</
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
732 S.W.2d 817 (1987) 292 Ark. 632 Joe Henry JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 86-150. Supreme Court of Arkansas. July 6, 1987. *819 Lohnes T. Tiner, Harrisburg, Chet Dunlap, Trumann, for appellant. Steve Clark, Atty. Gen. by Lee Taylor Franke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock,
CAROL PUHL n/k/a CAROL MORLEY v. THOMAS PUHLpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CAROL PUHL n/k/a CAROL MORLEY, Appellant, v. THOMAS PUHL, Appellee. No. 4D18-365 [November 28, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Sherwood Bauer
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Kimbellpublic domain
ORDER SULLIVAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Oregon Natural Desert Association, Center for Biological Diversity, and Western Watersheds Project (collectively “ONDA”) filed a complaint against United States Forest Service (‘.‘Forest Service”) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), alleging violations of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), the National Forest Management Act (“N
Matter of Fernandez v. Nigropublic domain
Matter of Fernandez v Nigro (2019 NY Slip Op 08672) Matter of Fernandez v Nigro 2019 NY Slip Op 08672 Decided on December 4, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu
In Re Simspublic domain
995 So.2d 635 (2008) In re Tera Marie SIMS. No. 2008-OB-2740. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 24, 2008. ORDER Considering the Joint Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status, IT IS ORDERED that Tera Marie Sims, Louisiana Bar Roll number 21879, also known as Tera Sims Hotard, be and she hereby is transferred to disability inactive statu
Pruitt v. Plilerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM** The State of California appeals the district court’s grant of habeas corpus relief to Petitioner Chet Randall Pruitt. The district court found that Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the state trial court granted, but later revoked, Petitioner’s request to represent himself at trial. The district court found that the California Court of Appeal’s holding that Petitioner’s req
Baker v. McNeilpublic domain
711 F.Supp.2d 1313 (2010) Willie BAKER, Petitioner, v. Walter McNEIL, Respondent. Case No. 4:06cv514-RH/AK. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. March 31, 2010. *1314 Randolph P. Murrell, Chet Kaufman, Federal Public Defender Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner. Christine Ann Guard, Attorne