Cases

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. In February and March of 1996, Pamela Jean Tylka, H. Joshua Chaet, Cheryl Keller, Jeanette DeLeon, Toni Cainkar, Elaine T. Hyneck, and Barbara F. Berg filed almost identical class-action lawsuits against Gerber Products in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. In their complaints, the plaintiffs alleged that Gerber engaged in a pattern of false and d

490 S.W.2d 231 (1973) REPUBLIC BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Cheryl COFFEY, Appellee. No. 8290. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. January 22, 1973. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1973. *232 Beard & Kultgen, Thomas L. Cook, Waco, for appellant. Kirby Ratliff & Sansom, Ted. L.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. This case illustrates the difficulties that result when an arguably appropriate judgment is entered but is not supported by adequate findings of fact and law as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). The suit is a gender discrimination case brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. The district judge, after a bench trial, awarded judg

*********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as: STIPULATED FACTS 1. All parties are properly before the Industrial Commission, and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and this claim. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Law-Enforcement

Matter of Dursi v Coffey (2026 NY Slip Op 01199) Matter of Dursi v Coffey 2026 NY Slip Op 01199 Decided on March 4, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion i

PER CURIAM. This Title VII sex discrimination case brought by Cheryl Jones against her former employer, Jones Brothers Construction Corp., is before us for the second time. The facts of the suit are fully set forth in our original opinion, Jones v. Jones, 879 F.2d 295 (7th Cir.1989), and will not be repeated here. That opinion remanded the case to the distr

665 A.2d 215 (1995) Charles B. HARVEY, Jr. v. Cheryl A. ROBINSON formerly Cheryl Harvey. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs February 27, 1995. Decided September 18, 1995. *216 J. Bradford Coffey, Mitchell & Stearns, Bangor, for Plaintiff. Martha J. Harris, Paine, Lynch & Harris, P.A., Bangor, for

10/25/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 23, 2017 Session NEIGHBORS OF OLD HICKORY, ET AL. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 16-301-IV Robert E. L

POOLER, Circuit Judge: Defendants-Appellants City of New York, New York City Council, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, and Jonathan Mintz (collectively, “Defendants” ,or “New York City”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Eric N. Vitaliano, J.), entered on February 14, 2013, which granted in part the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs-A

PER CURIAM: This case returns to us following certification to the New York Court of Appeals. Defendants-Appellants the City of New York, the New York City Council, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, and Commissioner of the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs Julie Menin appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Eric N. Vitali-ano, J.), e

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. The United States charged Henry Mas-quelier with conspiracy to defraud the Department of Defense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and with defrauding the United States in connection with a government contract in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1031. The district court denied Masque-lier’s motion in limine seeking to admit evidence

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, concurring. I am pleased to join Judge Eschbach’s opinion for the court, but I write separately to comment briefly on the requirement in this circuit’s eases that someone like Paters, who alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in deciding to reject a proposed plea agreement, must show through objective evidence even in advance of a hearing

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of whether the district court erred in not according a convicted defendant the opportunity to allocute at resentencing, which was restricted to the issue of whether an unadju-dicated state nolo contendere disposition can be used for computing criminal history under the Sentencing Guidelines. On remand

MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: In April 2010, the SEC sued Goldman Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”) and its employee, Fabrice Tourre, for alleged violations of the securities laws in connection with the offer and sale of securities and security-based swap agreements. The transaction at issue involved ABACUS 2007-AC1 (“AC1”), a synthetic collateralized debt obligat

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Lola O’Brien (O’Brien) was convicted by a jury of one count of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and one count of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. She was sentenced to twenty-seven months’ incarceration, and ordered to pay $129,937.80 in restitution. O’Brien appeals, challenging her conviction and sentence. We a

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. In June of 1994, Sara Lee Corporation implemented a corporation-wide reduction-in-force (RIF) affecting personnel from every department. At that time, Lora Ilhardt, an in-house attorney, differed from her law department colleagues in only two respects: she worked part-time and she was pregnant. When pressured by Sara Lee’s president to redu

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Thelma Gist pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count 1 of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, arising out of her operation of a travel promotion business in which customers would pay her for bargain travel packages and she would deliver less than promised. Her activities incl

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. A group of fleeced investors filed this suit more than 13 years ago. William Tully and some associates created a series of partnerships known as the Mid-America Energy Oil and Gas Program. Promoters pitched the program in hotels’ meeting rooms; no underwriter, dealer, or other financial intermediary looked out for these unsophisticated investors’ in

U.S. Bank N.A. v Evans (2022 NY Slip Op 04928) U.S. Bank N.A. v Evans 2022 NY Slip Op 04928 Decided on August 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 317 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 318 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT