Cases

Murphy v Westchester One, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 04657) Murphy v Westchester One, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 04657 Decided on August 13, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Justice Boyd delivered the opinion of the Court. Over twenty years ago, the Texas State Board of Examiners of Marriage and Family Therapists (the Therapists Board) adopted a rule that permits licensed marriage and family therapists (MFTs) to provide “diagnostic assessment ... to help individuals identify their emotional, mental, and behavioral problems.” Nearly ten years ago, the Texas Medical Association

Matter of Warren v Brandofino (2025 NY Slip Op 01638) Matter of Warren v Brandofino 2025 NY Slip Op 01638 Decided on March 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

444 B.R. 164 (2011) In re GULF FLEET HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtors. Gulf Fleet Holdings, Inc., Plaintiff v. M/V Gulf Tiger, In Rem, and Thoma-Sea Boat Builders, L.L.C., as Purported Owner, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 10-50713, 10-50714, 10-50715, 10-50716, 10-50718, 10-50719, 10-50720, 10-50721, 10-50722, 10-50723. Adversary No. 10-05044. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SOUTHPOINTE GOLF CLUB, INC., : No. 217 WAL 2021 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court :

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Like hundreds of other Occupy Wall Street protesters, plaintiff Justin Adkins was arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge on October 1, 2011. Unlike the other protesters, Adkins, following his arrest, was handcuffed to a wall for seven hours. Plaintiff alleges he was treated differently because he is transgender. He brought the present suit against the C

ERVIN, Circuit Judge: This is the second appearance of “Johnny Reb” in this court. Johnny Reb, the former cartoon symbol of the Fairfax High School Rebels, was eliminated by defendant-appellee Harry Holsinger, the school’s principal, after he received complaints from black students and parents. Students protested his decision in a number of ways before filing this action. The district court initially dismissed it as frivolous,

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 10, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert

ORDER ON PARTIES’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) motion for partial summary judgment of breach of contract and summary judgment on Motorola’s third, fourth, fifth, seventh, eighth, and ninth affirmative defenses and second counterclaim. (Microsoft Mot. (Dkt. ## 727 (redacted), 729 (

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 70], filed on April 13, 2012 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims under the United States Constitution, the Indiana Constitution, and Indiana tort law. F

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Andrea Weller ("appellant"), appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas after a bench trial in which appellant was found guilty of a total of 19 counts of passing bad checks in violation of R.C. 2913.11, one count being a misdemeanor of the first degree, and the remaining counts being felonies of the

Richard J. Sullivan, Circuit Judge: *92Plaintiff-Appellant Eon Shepherd appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, J .), which dismissed his pro se complaint with prejudice as a sanction for misrepresenting his litigation history. The district court also determine

638 S.E.2d 376 (2006) DALEY et al. v. CLARK et al. No. A06A1166. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 2, 2006. *378 Peter F. Boyce, P.C., Duluth, David F. Walbert, Parks, Chesin, Walbert, Atlanta, for appellants. Freeman, Mathis & Gary, Theodore Freeman, Carothers & Mitchell, Atlanta, Richard A. Carothers, Cheryl

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

409 F.Supp.2d 689 (2005) A.K., by his Parents and Next Friends J.K. and E.S., Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDRIA CITY SCHOOL BOARD Defendant. No. Civ.A. 05-229. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. December 20, 2005. *690 William B. Reichhardt, Fairfax, VA, for Plaintiffs. Andrea Dawn Gemignani, John F.

41 So.3d 151 (2010) Oscar Ray BOLIN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC08-1963. Supreme Court of Florida. July 1, 2010. *153 Robert A. Norgard and Andrea Norgard of Norgard and Norgard, Bartow, FL, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Stephen D. Ake and Katherine Maria Diamand

WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Judge. T1 Chad Gottfried (Father) appeals an order granting a petition by Crisis Pregnancy Outreach, Inc. (C.P.0.) pursuant to 10 0.9.2001 § 7505-2.1 2 to terminate his parental rights to L.D.B. and to allow adoption of the child without his consent pursuant to grounds stated in 10 0.8.2001 § 7505-4.2. The trial court's order finding Father failed to provide Jamye Beasley

17‐2261 Shepherd v. Comm’r Annucci United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2018 No. 17‐2261 EON SHEPHERD, Plaintiff‐Appellant,

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice, dissenting. [¶ 71] I respectfully dissent. Section 52-06-04(2), N.D.C.C., is, I believe, ambiguous. The legislative history of the amendments to the statute is no less ambiguous as illustrated by the majority opinion and Justice Sandstrom’s dissenting opinion. It is particularly in this circumstance that I defer to the interpretation of the statute by the agency charged with its executi

363 B.R. 591 (2007) In re Daniel Edward BROWN, and Shirley Ann Brown, Debtors. Thomas E. Boland, Plaintiff, v. Darcy M. Crum, Joseph V. Womack, Richard J. Samson, William M. Kebe, Jr., Ross P. Richardson, Gary S. Deschenes, Donald W. Torgenrud, Jr., Robert G. Drummond, Daniel Edward Brown, Shirley Ann Brown, James A Patten, Sharon R. Pruitt, Earl D. Pruitt, Laura J. Sandstrom, Clayton J. Arceneaux, Kenneth Johnson, Brandi L. Hazen, Gayle Ride