Cases

OPINION BY OLSON, J.: Appellant, The Hartford Insurance Group (“Hartford”) on behalf of Chunli Chen, appeals from the order entered on February 25, 2016, which sustained the preliminary objections filed by Kafumba Kamara, Thrifty Car Rental, and Rental Car Finance Group (hereinafter, collectively “the Defendants”). We respectfully vacate and remand.

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, Dissenting For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Domtar Paper Co., 631 Pa. 463, 113 A.3d 1230

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR, Dissenting For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Domtar Paper Co. , 631 Pa. 463, 113 A.3d 1230 (2015), I wou

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v Hudson Excess Ins. Co. (2025 NY Slip Op 03249) Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v Hudson Excess Ins. Co. 2025 NY Slip Op 03249 Decided on May 29, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Repor

*416 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Michael H. Dolinger’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) addressing Interve-nor Plaintiff Hana Financial, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment against: New Trend Apparel Inc., JCM Inc., Kisum Louie, and Byunglim Louie (the “Ne

14‐1469‐cv Ya‐Chen Chen v. City University of New York, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2014 (Argued: March 25, 2015 Decided: October 28, 2015) No. 14‐1469‐cv

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge: Plaintiff-Relator Ping Chen brings this action against Defendants EMSL Analytical, Inc. (“EMSL”), The Louis Berger Group, Inc. (“Louis Berger”), Taylor Environmental Group, Inc. (“Taylor”), J.C. Broderick & Associates Inc. (“J.C. Broderick”), Hillman Environmental Co., Inc. and Hillman Environmental Group, L.L.C. (together, “Hillman”), Airtek En

Justice Flaherty, for the Court. The plaintiffs, Brooke Chen, Wei Chen, Yifan Shuai, and the Estate of Brian Chen, seek review of an order entered in the Superior Court that quashed the oral deposition of M.Y., the minor daughter of the defendants, Lingting Ye and Yan Sun. 1 Before this Court, the plaintiffs argue, in

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated July 6, 2007, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Peter Gastaldi against them on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-2776 & 22-2858 HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY CO., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ZHEN FENG LIN and LI CHEN, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-2776 & 22-2858 HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY CO., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ZHEN FENG LIN and LI CHEN, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for

39 F.Supp.2d 1216 (1999) Inno EKEH, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. C 98-0247 FMS(BZ). United States District Court, N.D. California. January 29, 1999. *1217 Ronald J. Souza, Joseph D. Miller, Schachter Kristoff Orenstein & Berkowitz, San Francisco, CA, Wesley M. Lowe, E. Gerald Mannion, Mannion &

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. This case is before the Court on Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Inteplast Group, Ltd.’s (“Inteplast”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 52] (“In-teplast’s Motion for Summary Judgment”) and on Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Chih Shen Chen’s (“Gary Chen”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 55] (“Gary Chen’s Motion for Summa

[J-4-2018][M.O. - Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP : No. 24 EAP 2017 ON BEHALF OF CHUNLI CHEN, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior : Court entered on 2/10/17 at No. 976 Appel

[J-4-2018][M.O. - Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP : No. 24 EAP 2017 ON BEHALF OF CHUNLI CHEN, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior : Court entered on 2/10/17 at No. 976 Appel

[J-4-2018][M.O. - Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP : No. 24 EAP 2017 ON BEHALF OF CHUNLI CHEN, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Superior : Court entered on 2/10/17 at No. 976 Appel

[J-4-2018] [MO: Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP : No. 24 EAP 2017 ON BEHALF OF CHUNLI CHEN, : : Appeal from the Judgment of the Appellee : Superior Court entered on February

[J-4-2018] [MO: Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP : No. 24 EAP 2017 ON BEHALF OF CHUNLI CHEN, : : Appeal from the Judgment of the Appellee : Superior Court entered on February

308 S.W.3d 49 (2009) SAFECO LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 04-09-00322-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. December 23, 2009. *51 R. Brent Cooper, Diana L. Faust, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Appellant. Larry J. Goldman, Michelle M. Copeland, Goldman,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge. In this diversity case,1 plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) brought suit against defendant George Perinovic (“Perinovic”) for his alleged failure to honor certain indemnity agreements made with Hartford for any costs it incurred as surety for a travel services company. This matter