Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Chen v. Jung”
Jung Hyun Yuk v. Liang Chenpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), dated February 9, 2010, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Liang Chen, joined by the defendant Rachel Ingraham, which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground
Chen Po-Jung v. Gerkenpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The Summary Final Judgment of Foreclosure is affirmed as against the appellants Chen Po-Jung and Liao Shu-Tzu Chen individually and as co-trustees of the Chen Family Trust, without prejudice to the interests, if any, of the appellant Faith Christian Academy, Inc., which interests remain unresolved by the final summary judgment. '
Jung Fu Chien v. Chenpublic domain
759 S.W.2d 484 (1988) Jung Fu CHIEN, a/k/a Tomas Chien, Individually, et al., Appellants, v. Grace CHEN, et al., Appellees. No. 3-88-006-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. September 21, 1988. *486 John F. Williams, James V. Sylvester, Austin, for appellants. Elizabeth G. Bloch, Austin, for appellees. Before POWE
Careercom Corp. v. Po Jung Chenpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed except for the omission of prejudgment interest sought by appellee in his cross-appeal. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the award of prejudgment interest at the rate of ten percent per an-num as provided in the contract. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded with directions.
McENTEE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners, husband and wife, are natives and citizens of China. Mr. Chen was admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor in September, 1970; he later changed his status to that of a nonimmigrant student. His wife entered the United States as a nonimmigrant spouse in December, 1971. Both husband and wife received several extensions in the tim
In Re Jungpublic domain
637 F.3d 1356 (2011) In re Edward K.Y. JUNG and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. No. 2010-1019. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 28, 2011. *1358 Robert G. Sterne, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Jon E. Wright and Byron L. Pickard. Of counsel on the
Jung Ahe Park v. Mukaseypublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jung Ahe Park, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the November 28, 2007 *117order of the BIA affirming the January 12, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Joanna M. Bukszpan, denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. In re Jung Ahe Park, No. A97 698 015 (B.I.A. Nov. 28, 2007), <
Xiao Ping Chen v. City of Seattlepublic domain
223 P.3d 1230 (2009) XIAO PING CHEN, individually and as Personal Representative for the estate of Run Sen Liu, and Yu Ting Liu, a single person, Appellants, v. The CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, and Peter Walton Brown and Jane Doe Brown; and John and Jane Does 1-10, jointly and individually, Defendants. No. 62838-1-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. December 28,
Xiao Ping Chen v. City of Seattlepublic domain
fl A municipality has a duty to all travelers to maintain its roadways in conditions that are safe for ordinary travel. Whether roadway conditions are reasonably safe for ordinary travel depends on the circumstances surrounding a particular roadway. Although relevant to the determination of whether a municipality has breached its duty, evidence that a particular physical defect in a roadway rendered the roadway dangerous or misleading or evidence that a m
In re the Accounting of Su-Lien Chenpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Eugene E. Peckham, J. Decedent, Jung-Chao Liu, at his death owned assets in both the United States and Taiwan necessitating proceedings in Taiwan for payment of the estate tax in Taiwan. James, Mark and Jean Liu object to the accounting of Su-Lien Chen, as administrator of her deceased husband’s estate, alleging, among other grounds, that Ms. Chen delayed the estate tax proceedings in
327 F.3d 911 Wen-Wan CHANG; Tsung-Ming Chang; Chiao-Ying Chang; Yi Yuan Chiang; Hsien-Ming Hsieh; Shu-Chuan Hsieh; Pei-Chen Hsieh; Sung Duck Kong; Hye Ra Kong; Hyun Jung Kong; Min Suk Kong; Yei-Chien Lai; Yu Kuei Lai; Yen Chih Lai; Chen Ju Lai; Yoon Sik Lee; Jong Hee Lee; Eung Jun Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Eung Sang Lee; Cheng-Hsiung She; Hui Wen She; Tzu Ming She; Alabama Almark, LP; Alabama Bailey LP; Alabama Coosa LP; Alabama Dallas LP; Alabama Denim L
Cunningham v. Suds Pizza, Inc.public domain
JONATHAN W. FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge Findings of Fact Background of the Case 1. On August 6, 2015, Adam Cunningham, Alex Chefalo, and Remo Paglia ("plaintiffs"), former employees of defendant Mark's Pizzeria (hereinafter "Mark's"), Suds Pizza and Mark S. Crane ("Crane") (collectively, "defendants") filed a complaint on behalf of themselves and others
Reed v. Aqueon Productspublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Stephen and Cindy Reed (“plaintiffs”) bring this action against defendant Aqueon Products, and Central Garden and Pet (“defendants”) pursuant to this Court’s diversity jurisdiction for damages sustained when aquarium equipment manufactured by defendants caused a fire in their daughter’s bedroom.</
Baker v. BDO Seidman, L.L.P.public domain
390 F.Supp.2d 919 (2005) Randall P. BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BDO SEIDMAN, L.L.P., et al., Defendants. No. C-05-2500 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 29, 2005. Nancy L. Fineman, Cotchett Pitre Simon & McCarthy, Burlingame, CA, for Plaintiffs. Cary B. Samowitz, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, New York City, Gregory K.
Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp.public domain
753 F.Supp.2d 996 (2010) Alicia HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C-08-5198 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 5, 2010. *999 Craig Steven Hubble, Daniel Hyo-Shik Chang, Larry W. Lee, Diversity Law Group, Sherry Jung, Los Angeles, CA, Christina Ann Humphrey, Marcus Joseph
Harris v. VECTOR MARKETING CORP.public domain
656 F.Supp.2d 1128 (2009) Alicia HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C-08-5198 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 4, 2009. *1130 Craig Steven Hubble, Daniel Hyo-Shik Chang, Larry W. Lee, Diversity Law Group, Sherry Jung, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff. John H. Lien,
Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp.public domain
716 F.Supp.2d 835 (2010) Alicia HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C-08-5198 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 18, 2010. *836 Craig Steven Hubble, Daniel Hyo-Shik Chang, Larry W. Lee, Diversity Law Group, P.C., Sherry Jung, Law Office of Sherry Jung, Los Angeles, CA, Christina
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO DEPOSITION QUESTIONS BY ANDREW VU; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DEPOSITION OF JENNIFER LIU (Docket Nos. 145-46) CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant American Home Assurance Co. (“American Home”) has filed two motions to *
Napa Valley Publishing Co. v. City of Calistogapublic domain
225 F.Supp.2d 1176 (2002) NAPA VALLEY PUBLISHING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CALISTOGA, Defendant. No. C-02-3176 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 6, 2002. *1177 *1178 Roger R. Myers, Lisa Sitkin, Gregory K. Jung, Steinhart & Falconer, San Francisco, CA, for
Lynne Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.public domain
ORDER This court’s opinion filed March 4, 2013, and reported at 709 F.3d 829 (9th Cir. 2013), is withdrawn, and is replaced by the attached Opinion. With the filing of the new opinion, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Fletcher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Trott and Breyer so recommend.