Cases

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated October 7, 2011, which denied her motion pursuant to CELR 4404 to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant on the issue of liability and for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, to set aside the jury verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00428-CV Jinhui Chen § From County Court at Law No. 2 § of Denton County (CV-2011-02750) v. § May 30, 2013 Jodi Johnson and Joseph Johnson § Opinion by Justice Walker

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00428-CV JINHUI CHEN APPELLANT V. JODI JOHNSON AND JOSEPH APPELLEES JOHNSON ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNT

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated October 7, 2011, which denied her motion pursuant to CELR 4404 to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant on the issue of liability and for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, to set aside the jury verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial.

Opinion P. McKAY, P. J. — Defendant and appellant Joelle Kraft appeals the judgment entered in an unlawful detainer action after the court granted plaintiff and respondent Louise Chen’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant contends there were triable issues of fact concerning whether the rental of the spare room at the premises via Airbnb constituted an illegal use of the property under Los Angeles Munic

C. Johnson, J. ¶1 The central issue in this case is the apparent conflict between a statutory requirement that arguably limits disclosure of competency evaluations prepared pursuant to chapter 10.77 RCW and our state constitutional requirement that “[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly.” Wash. Const, art. I, § 10. Once the competency evaluation was filed with the court, the trial court relied on it to determine the

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Nalco and David Chen conducted a joint venture to sell environmental equipment in China. Nalco owned 55% of the venture, Chen 40%, and a third party 5%. When the joint venture (Nalco Mobotec Environmental Protection Technology (Shanghai) Co., or NMEPT) encountered business problems, Nalco guaranteed a loan, which NMEPT was unable to cover. Nalco paid

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Mei Y. Chen, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of a May 10, 2005 order of the BIA affirming the April 21, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sandy K. Horn, denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Mei Y. Chen, No. A 96 191 713 (BIA May 10, 2005), aff'g No. A 96 191 713 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City April

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Song Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an April 12, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the November 15, 2004 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Sarah Burr denying petitioner’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Song Chen, No. A 97 479 536 (B.I.A. April 12, 2006), aff'g No. A

MEMORANDUM ** Qiuyan Chen, native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of *564Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Zhi Fan Chen and Richard K. Wun appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 30, 2008, which granted the motion of the defendant Eileen Johnson for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her, and the plaintiffs separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of the same order a

MEMORANDUM ** Qiuyan Chen, native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of *564Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.

SUMMARY ORDER On May 15, 2007, this Court entered an order denying the government’s motion to remand and directing the government to submit further briefing. Due to a filing error, the May 15 order did not reflect the views of the panel, which had voted to remand to the BIA based on the government’s motion to remand and the government’s representation that petitioner’s counsel consented to such a remand. See Resp’t

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of these petitions for review of decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that this petition for review is GRANTED, the BIA’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the BIA for further proceedings in accordance with this decision. Yi Long Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China (“China”), seek

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition be DENIED. Petitioner Gao Yan Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a March 23, 2004 order of the BIA affirming the December 12, 2002 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Adam Opaciuch de

MEMORANDUM ** Yi Xu Chen appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for alien smuggling, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Chen contends that the district court erred by permitting the Government to move for a substantial assistance departure as to only Count 4. We conclude th

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the petition for review be DENIED. Petitioner Gen Hwa Chen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the BIA affirming a decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) rejecting the petitioners’ application for asy

MEMORANDUM ** Hsin-Yu Chen appeals the three-year sentence imposed following her conviction for alien smuggling. She contends that the district court erred in ruling that it lacked authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3561(a) to impose a sentence of probation because the three-year mandatory minimum sentencing provision of 18 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) does not expressly preclude a sentence of probation within the

CHEN, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) appeals a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) holding that Diagnostic Code 7806 under 38 C.F.R. § 4.118 (DC 7806), a diagnostic code for rating disabilities for a skin condition, unambiguously defines a topical corticosteroid treatment as “systemic therapy” rather than “topical t

257 F.Supp.2d 656 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Bao Deng CHEN, Defendant. No. 02 CR. 1039(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 28, 2003. *657 Francisco E. Celedonio, Law Office of Francisco E. Celedonio, New York, New York, for Defendant. Joon H. Kim, William F. Johnson, Assistant United States Att