Cases

CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, opinion of the Court: ¶ 1 The Gift Clause of Arizona’s Constitution bars cities and other public entities from “mak[ing] any donation or grant, by subsidy or otherwise, to any individual, association, or corporation.” Ariz. Const, art. 9, § 7. For decades, the City of Phoenix has contracted in collective bargaining agreements with police officers to allow “release time,” that is, to pay o

OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 The City of Phoenix (“City”) and the intervenor police officers and the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association (collectively, “PLEA”) appeal the trial court’s order enjoining enforcement of “release time” provisions of the 2012-14 Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the City and PLEA Under this agreement, the City paid PLEA approximately $1.7 million in release time, which is

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE WILLIAM R. CHEATHAM and MARCUS HUEY, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. SAL DICICCIO in his official capacity as a member of the Phoenix City Council; CITY OF PHOENIX; PHOENIX LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION, Defendants/Appellants, _________________________________ THOMAS COX; VICTOR ESCOTO; RICHARD V. HARTSON; VIVIAN REQUE;

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Anup Engquist (“Engquist”) brought suit alleging violations of federal anti-discrimination law, constitutional law, and state tort law against her former employer, the Oregon Department of Agriculture (“ODA”) and John Szczepanski (“Szczepanski”) and Joseph Hyatt (“Hyatt”). A jury found the individual defendants liable for constitutional violations of equal protection and substantive due proc

75 Ariz. 227 (1953) 255 P.2d 173 BRISTOR et al. v. CHEATHAM et al. No. 5334. Supreme Court of Arizona. March 14, 1953. *229 Dwight L. Solomon, of Phoenix, for appellants. *230 Cunningham, Carson, Messinger & Carson, Snell & Wilmer, by James A. Walsh, and

99 Ariz. 269 (1965) 408 P.2d 818 CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. PHOENIX CIVIC AUDITORIUM & CONVENTION CENTER ASSOCIATION, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Appellee. No. 8394. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. December 13, 1965. *271 Merle L. Hanson, City Atty., Phoenix, by Robert

73 Ariz. 228 (1952) 240 P.2d 185 BRISTOR et al. v. CHEATHAM et al. No. 5334. Supreme Court of Arizona. January 12, 1952. Rehearing Granted February 26, 1952. *230 Dwight L. Solomon, Phoenix, for appellants. Cunningham, Carson, Messinger & Carson, Snell & Wilmer and Wilson &a;

McFarland, Justice: This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment wherein the trial court held that an agreement entered into between the City of Phoenix, hereinafter called the City, and the Phoenix Civic Auditorium & Convention Center Association, Inc., a nonprofit organization, hereinafter called the Association, was violative of the Arizona budget laws as provided for in A.R.S. § 42-301 to 42-312, as amended, and was t

478 F.3d 985 Anup ENGQUIST, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.OREGON DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; Joseph (Jeff) Hyatt; John Szczepanski, Defendants-Appellants.Anup Engquist, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Oregon Department of Agriculture; Joseph (Jeff) Hyatt; John Szczepanski, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-35170. No. 05-35263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

McFARLAND, Justice (especially concurring) : I concur in the able opinion of Justice Struckmeyer; however, because of the importance of the subject I feel that it is desirable to express my views emphasizing some of my reasons for my concurrence. The issues involved in the case are set forth in the majority opinion. Also the history of the development of the law is likewise discussed. Th

ORDER James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the Court are Nominal Defendant Inventure Foods, Inc. (“Inven-ture”) and Defendants Terry McDaniel, Steve Weinberger, Timothy A. Cole, Ash-ton D. Asensio, Macon Bryce Edmonson, Paul J. Lapadat, Harold S. Edwards, David L. Meyers, and Itzhak Reichman’s (the “Individual Defendants’”) Motion to Dismiss Shareholder Derivative Complain

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA MARK GILMORE, * ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. KATE GALLEGO, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-23-0130-PR Filed July 31, 2024 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Ho

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Donovan and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission reverses the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Donovan. ***********

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. KENNETH WAYNE THOMPSON, II, Appellant. No. CR-19-0141-AP Filed January 19, 2022 Appeal from the Superior Court in Yavapai County The Honorable Patricia A.

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, with whom Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS concurs. Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. Opinion dissenting as to jurisdiction and not deciding the merits filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge: The district court rejected appellants’ challenge to the Patient Protection

543 F.Supp. 1270 (1982) Clifton N. CHERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Wesley E. STEINER, et al., Defendants. No. CIV 81-719 PHX CAM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 19, 1982. *1271 *1272 Mark Wilmer and Robert B. Hoffman, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs. Ka

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman

185 Ariz. 68 (1996) 912 P.2d 1297 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Fred Woodrow ROSCOE, Appellant. No. CR-95-0023-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. February 29, 1996. Grant Woods, Attorney General by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Linda L. Knowles, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, for Appellee. Susan