Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Chavez (PS) v. Williams”
United States v. Cervantes-Chavezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Exception to *1299Pre-Sentence Report and Request for Ev-identiary Hearing, filed June 27, 2014 (Doc. 20) (“Objections”). The Court held a hearing on September 12, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether to apply th
Chavez v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. at Pascopublic domain
FAIRHURST, C.J. *227 *511 ¶ 1 Judith Q. Chavez, Kathleen Christianson, Oralia Garcia, Marrietta Jones, and other registered nurses (nurses) sought class certification in their wage action again
79 F.3d 1014 Jimmy McCLENDON a/k/a Billy McClendon; Harold Lund; PeterSumatkak; David Michael Bauer; Carl Ray Lopez; BruceDavid Morawe; Thomas Young; Ruthie Duran; Deborah Lavera;Janelle Roybal; Dannette Difiori; Maria Sisneros; LarryGreen; Bartel Haley; Michael Cote; Joe Ray Herrera;Josie Kriena; Debbie Lucero; David Shawkin; Marc A.Gillette; George Chavez; Eliseo Baca; Clint Barras;Francisco Melende
In re the Marriage of Robinsonpublic domain
Kulik, C.J. ¶1 — Subject matter jurisdiction in dissolution proceedings exists if one of the parties is a resident of Washington during the proceedings. Residence is domicile in fact and intent to reside presently in Washington. ¶2 Here, by their own statements, neither Douglas nor Juraluck Robinson resided, or intended to reside, in Washington at the filing or during the pendency of the dissolution. Therefore,
Martinez v. Hendersonpublic domain
252 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2002) Ernesto MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. CIV.00-1567LCS/RLP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. July 22, 2002. *1227 Michael E. Mozes, Albuquerque, for Plaintiff. Michael H. Hoses, Albuquerque, for Defendant.</
State v. A.A.public domain
Lawrence-Berrey, J. ¶1 Warrantless searches of constitutionally protected areas are presumptively unreasonable absent proof by the State that one of the well-established exceptions apply. In this case, a police officer detained A.A., a runaway juvenile, under the Family Reconciliation Act, chapter 13.32A RCW, and then conducted a pat-down search before placing him in his patrol car. The officer did not feel anything resembling a
Armantrout v. Carlsonpublic domain
Cox, J. ¶1 At issue is whether services by an adult child to a parent are properly considered in determining whether that parent is “dependent ... for support” for purposes of that parent qualifying as a beneficiary under the wrongful death statute. Because the provision of services in this case is not financial dependence under the statute and case law, we reverse and remand. ¶2 Eighteen-year-old Kristen Arm
In Re Marriage of Robinsonpublic domain
248 P.3d 532 (2010) 159 Wash.App. 162 In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Douglas Kenneth ROBINSON, Respondent, and Juraluck Robinson, Appellant. No. 27143-9-III. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. December 28, 2010. As Amended on Reconsideration February 17, 2011. Tami Michele Chavez, Chavez Law Office PS, Spokane, WA, for
Vandeventer v. Guimondpublic domain
494 F.Supp.2d 1255 (2007) John VANDEVENTER, as personal representative of the Estates of Elisse Vandeventer and Marissa Vandeventer, John Vandeventer, individually, and Shellee Vandeventer, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Dale GUIMOND, and Board of County Commissioners of Coffey County, Kansas, Defendants. No. 07-4018-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 10, 2007.
In Re the Marriage of Thompsonpublic domain
988 P.2d 499 (1999) In re the MARRIAGE OF Kevin Wesley THOMPSON, Respondent, and Gina Diane Thompson, Appellant. No. 42168-9-1. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. November 22, 1999. *500 William Robert Bishin, William R. Bishin, Inc., Seattle, Edward Robert Skone, Kinzel, Allen, Skone & Searing, Bellevue, for Appellant.<
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [doc. nos. 145, 146, 147, 151, 152, 153, 184, 185, 197, 201] M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge. Currently pending are the individual defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The motions are fully briefed and are considered without oral argument. I. Background On March 23, 2012, Plaintiffs, the Estate of Anastacio Hernand
Oxy USA WTP LP v. Benjamin Mendez Bringas, Manuel Mendez Bringas and Rene Mendez Bringaspublic domain
Opinion issued July 9, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00373-CV ——————————— OXY USA WTP LP, Appellant V. BENJAMIN MENDEZ BRINGAS, MANUEL MENDEZ BRINGAS, AND
Oxy USA WTP LP v. Benjamin Mendez Bringas, Manuel Mendez Bringas and Rene Mendez Bringaspublic domain
Opinion issued July 9, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00373-CV ——————————— OXY USA WTP LP, Appellant V. BENJAMIN MENDEZ BRINGAS, MANUEL MENDEZ BRINGAS, AND
Mohamed K. Abdo & Fardowsa J. Farahpublic domain
United States Tax Court 162 T.C. No. 7 MOHAMED K. ABDO AND FARDOWSA J. FARAH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5514-20. Filed April 2, 2024. ————— R issued Ps a notice of deficiency dated December 2
Huerta v. Kava Holdings, Inc.public domain
Filed 11/14/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT FELIX HUERTA, B277164, B281303 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC554145) v. KAVA HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. CONSOLIDATED APPEALS from a judgmen
Campbell v. Chavespublic domain
402 F.Supp.2d 1101 (2005) Mark CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. J. CHAVES, et al., Defendants. No. 04-78 TUC DCB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. November 28, 2005. *1102 Mark Campbell, Montgomery, AL, pro se. ORDER BURY, District Judge. The Court denies the Motion to Dismiss (document 33) filed by
Armantrout v. Carlsonpublic domain
170 P.3d 1218 (2007) Josie ARMANTROUT, personal representative of the estate of Kristen Armantrout; Josie Armantrout and Warren Armantrout, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents, v. Robert CARLSON, M.D. and Jane Doe Carlson, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; and Cascade Orthopaedics, a partnership; and/or John Does 1-100, partners therein, Appellants. No. 58831-
Gausvik v. Perezpublic domain
239 F.Supp.2d 1108 (2002) Ralph GAUSVIK, Plaintiff, v. Robert Ricardo PEREZ, individually, and in his official capacity; et al., Defendants. No. CS-01-071-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. November 27, 2002. *1109 John S. Stocks, Van Siclen Stocks & Firkins, Auburn, WA, Robert Craig Van Siclen, Tyler K. Firk
Gausvik v. Perezpublic domain
239 F.Supp.2d 1067 (2002) Ralph GAUSVIK, Plaintiff, v. Robert Ricardo PEREZ, individually, and in his official capacity; et al., Defendants. No. CS-01-071-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. September 16, 2002. *1074 John S. Stocks, Van Siclen Stocks & Firkins, Auburn, WA, Robert Craig Van Siclen, Tyler K. Fir
Howard v. Ealingpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ROGER B. COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This lawsuit, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, stems from the arrest of Jenoire Howard, Sr., by Fort Wayne police officers Phillip Ealing, Clay Taylor, and Shane Heath while Howard was selling clothing out of his van on August 13, 2009. Howard claims he was falsely arrested and the victim o