Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jennifer L. Chase, v. Case No. 20-cv-915-PB Opinion No. 2023 DNH 037 Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Social Security claimant Jennifer Chase retained attorney Francis Jackson to appeal the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) deci

736 F.Supp.2d 270 (2010) Jamie L. BARD, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER, Defendant. No. 1:09-cv-294-JAW. United States District Court, D. Maine. August 31, 2010. *271 David A. Chase, MacDonald, Chase & Dufour, Bangor, ME, for Plaintiff. Mark J. Mendola, Social Security Administration Office of

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The disability programs administered under the Social Security Act "are of a size and extent difficult to comprehend." Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 399,

MEMORANDUM OPINION S. ALLAN ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate Judge. Dorethia Spearman has filed an appeal under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision ceasing her entitlement to disability insurance benefits (DIB) under Section 223(f) of the Social Security Act. In a decision dated January 25, 2006, the Social Security Administration initially d

ORDER David Chase applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, claiming that he is disabled by an ulcer on his right big toe. The Social Security Administration denied his application initially, on reconsideration, and after a hearing before an administrative law judge; the district court affirmed. On appeal Chase primarily contends that the ALJ, in evaluating his residual functional capacity (RFC) for s

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On June 22, 2012, Plaintiff Juan Rolon commenced this action for review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying his application for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) and Supplemental Security Insurance (“SSI”) benefits. Dkt. No. 2. The Defendant moves for a judgment on the pleadings, affirmin

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (document no. IS), GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 12), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 9), AND DISMISSING CASE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. The Social Security Administration (“SSA”) denied Plaintiff and claimant Mar

PER CURIAM. Katherine Graddy appeals after the District Court1 dismissed her pro se complaint preservice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (requiring dismissal of a pro se complaint for failure to state a claim) and denied her post-judgment motion. Upon careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See Potthoff v. Morin, 245 F.3d 710, 716 (8th Cir.2001) (explaining that a claim for in

08-0659-cv Poupore v. Comm’r of Social Security 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 7 August Term, 2008 8 9 (Argued: February 5, 2009 Decided: April 16, 2009 10 Amended: May 19, 2009) 11 12

08-0659-cv Poupore v. Comm’r of Social Security 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 7 August Term, 2008 8 9 (Argued: February 5, 2009 Decided by Summary Order: February 19, 2009 10 Opinion Published: April 16, 2009 11

DUGGAN, J. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 34, the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Barbadoro, J.) certified the following question for our consideration: Is a child conceived after her father’s death via artificial insemination eligible to inherit from her father as his surviving issue under New Hampshire intestacy l

EILED COURT OF APPEALS DPI: Siitic:vIAs: 11, i7r2:; 201 tiEC '5 I.:: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 75050-0-1

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Steven Chase and Shawn Penner appeal the district court's 1 dismissal of their putative class action lawsuit against First Federal Bank of Kansas City ("First Federal") and former directors of Inter-State Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kansas City ("Inter-State"). We affirm.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*910OPINION OF THE COURT Yvonne Lewis, J. On March 14, 1997, the Department of Social Services recorded a lien against 5707 12th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, block 697, lot 7, for Medicaid nursing home coverage that had been furnished to the plaintiffs mother, the late Josephine Roccanova, from August 12, 1996 and accruing eventually to October 1, 2001

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned On Briefs October 8, 2012 Session IN THE MATTER OF: CHASE B.S., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. X6145, X0784, X1494 and X1512 Curtis S. Person, Jr., Judge No. W2011-02334-COA-R3-JV - Filed November 30, 2012 The trial court dismissed “petitions for medical support” of non-ma

KELLER, J. The defendant, J. Maurice Herman, appeals following the trial court's issuance of a turnover order pursuant to General Statutes § 52-356b. The plaintiff, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., applied for the order. The defendant claims that (1) the court improperly exercised personal jurisdiction over him, and (2) the order improperly deviated from the court's prio

USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 96-1622 MEGAN BARKER, Plaintiff

Opinion LAVERY, J. The defendant commissioner of social services appeals from the judgment of the trial court *193rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Ann O’Callaghan.1 As a threshold matter, we conclude that the plaintiffs death during the pendency of this administrative appeal did not render the appeal moot beca

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct