Cases

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest and false imprisonment, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated June 26, 2001, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the causes of action to recover damages for false arrest and false imprisonment, and for summary judgment on the counterclaim. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with co

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM KIVETT; BERNARD No. 21-15667 BRAVO; LISA BRAVO, D.C. No. 3:18-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellees, 05131-WHA v. OPINION FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Cour

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON VIOLATION OF WASHINGTON’S DEED OF TRUST ACT, RCW 61.24 ET SEQ. MARC BARRECA, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court on Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, One West Bank FSB, and Northwest Trustee Service’s motions for summary judgment on the only remaining claims in this action, violations of the Washington Deed of Trust

Cox, J. ¶1 Primarily at issue in this appeal of a CR 12(b)(6) dismissal is whether OneWest Bank FSB and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS) met their burden to show that Marisa Bavand failed to show any set of facts that would justify granting relief.1 Also at issue is whether the trial court properly granted the motion to validate the trustee’s sale of Bavand’s property by Regional T

Salinger, Kenneth W., J. Lydia Laguer brought this lawsuit to challenge the mortgage foreclosure sale of her home. The Court ALLOWS OneWest’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Laguer’s motion to amend her complaint because: (1) Laguer’s loan is not subject to the Massachusetts Predatory Home Loan Practices Act, G.L.c. 183C, and in any case federal law governing federally-chartered savings banks would preempt application of c.

MICHEL, Chief Judge. The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, awarding $48.7 million in damages to First Heights Bank, FSB, Pulte Diversified Companies, Inc., and Pulte Homes, Inc. (collectively, “plaintiffs”). The appeal was submitted after oral argument on July 6, 2005. Because the trial court properly determined liability and

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Derrick Davis purchased a home with a mortgage loan from World Savings Bank FSB; the loan is allegedly now held by Wachovia Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (collectively the “Defendants”). 1 Mr. Davis defaulted on payment of the mortg

193 P.3d 155 (2008) 144 Wash.App. 900 Anne and Chris McCURRY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Appellants, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK, F.S.B., Respondent. No. 60075-3-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. June 2, 2008. *156 Roblin John Williamson, Williamson & Williams, Bainbrid

937 A.2d 95 (2007) LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, Appellant Below, Appellant v. STATE BANK COMMISSIONER, Appellee Below, Appellee. No. 656, 2006. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 23, 2007. Decided: November 7, 2007. Modified: November 9, 2007. Stanford L. Stevenson, III and Anne Shea Gaza of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmi

INTHECOURTOF APPEALS Fl:LED J:N FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Court of Appeals Jt;N 0 7 2018 Lis2 Matz Clerk 1 5th District CAUSE NO. 05-16-00784-CV TONY A PARKS & PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC

629 F.Supp.2d 351 (2009) ING BANK, FSB (d/b/a ING Direct) and, ING Direct Bancorp, Plaintiffs, v. The PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., PNC Bank, National Association, and PNC Bank, Delaware, Defendants. Civ. No. 08-514-GMS-LPS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 22, 2009. *352 Francis DiGiovanni & Chad S.C. St

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-5021, -5022 FIRST HEIGHTS BANK, FSB, PULTE DIVERSIFIED COMPANIES, INC., and PULTE HOMES, INC., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. UNITED STATES,

617 N.W.2d 706 (2000) 242 Mich. App. 21 Mark KONYNENBELT, Paul C. Coolsen, Judy L. Coolsen, and Thomas F. Lampane, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, f/k/a First Security Savings Bank, Defendant-Appellant, and Ameribank Federal Savings, Sparta State Bank, and Fleet Finance, Inc., Defendants. Docket No. 214784. Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Spina, J. The present appeal is from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) affirming the denial by the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) of applications by the taxpayers, Capital One Bank (Capital One) and Capital One F.S.B. (FSB) (collectively, Capital banks), for the abatement of financial institution excises (FIET).2 Capital One sought abatement for the tax years 1995 through 1998, and

ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This Winstar-related case1 is nearing trial on issues regarding liability. As part of the preparations for trial, counsel are conducting interviews of persons listed as witnesses. In that connection, counsel for plaintiff (“American Federal”) is proposing to conduct voluntary interviews of persons who were previously employed by the government as regulator

MEMORANDUM DECISION BRICCETTI, District Judge: Plaintiff Wayne Miller brings this putative class action against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”), Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc. (“Wells Fargo Insurance” and, together with Wells Fargo Bank, the “Wells Fargo Defendants”), Assurant, Inc. (“Assurant”), and American Security Insurance Company (“ASIC” and, together with Assurant, th

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is an action for breach of contract. It is generally related to the Winstar1 group of cases and more specifically to a subset of cases claiming breach in connection with the “Guarini” legislation.2 Liability has previously been found in favor of plaintiffs. Pending are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judg

Opinion and Order BLOCK, Judge. This is a “Winstar” breach of contract case. It is an example of the many eases heard by this court which stem from the savings and loan crisis of the early 1980’s, Congress’ subsequent attempt to quell the crisis through passage of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub.L. No. 101-73,103 Stat. 183 (“FIRREA”), and the United Stat

415 F.Supp.2d 636 (2006) LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, et al. Plaintiffs, v. FRANK T. YODER MORTGAGE et al., Defendants. No. 1:05CV1398. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. February 13, 2006. *637 Brian F. Kenney, John E. Prominski, Jr., Miles & Stockbridge, McLean, VA, for Plaintiffs. Danny

*354ORDER AND JUDGMENT* STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. In these two cases which have been consolidated on appeal, plaintiff Liberty-Savings Bank (“Liberty”) appeals the award of summary judgment in favor of defendant GE Capital Corporation (“GE”) (Appeal No. 06-1091), and defendant GE appeals the denial of its motion