Cases

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. (“Prewitt”) appeals from the dismissal of its complaint against the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) for insufficient service of process and from the denial of its motion for alternative service of process. Prewitt’s complaint against OPEC alleged a violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l,

RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2023-SC-0235-DG BILL DUNN, MCCRACKEN COUNTY APPELLANT PROPERTY VALUATION ADMINISTRATOR ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2022-CA-0399 MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT NO. 21-CI-00191 SOLOMON FOUNDATION; AND APPELLEES K

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Feb 24 2017, 11:26 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

FORST, J. This case concerns an agreement and subsequent disagreement between two members of the auto-racing community. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff/Appellant Prewitt Enterprises, LLC and awarded damages for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement.' However, the fraudulent inducement verdict was reversed by the trial court, in favor of defendants/Appell

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Angela Leone, filed this action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, on behalf of herself and approximately 117 putative class members against the defendant debt collection agency, Ashwood Financial, Inc. (“Ashwood”). The plaintiff contends that the defen

553 F.3d 1351 (2008) HEMISPHERX BIOPHARMA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHANNESBURG CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS, a South African corporation, Anna Francina Venter and Rainotes Bantubonke Nduna, Provisional Trustees of the estate of R.B. Kebble, H.C. Buitendag, Bart Goemaere, John Doe, Defendants-Appellees. Bioclones (Proprietary) Limited, a South African corporation, Cyril Donninger, Defendants. No

994 S.W.2d 612 (1999) Mark C. GAAR and Leda Fay Gaar, Respondents, v. GAAR'S INC., Appellant. No. 22375. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. June 22, 1999. *613 Kay A. Van Pelt, Van Pelt & Van Pelt, P.C., Springfield, for appellant. *614 David L. Smith, Cantw

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

*919MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT M. DOW, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Schreiber Foods, Inc.’s motion for *920summary judgment [430]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendant Schreiber’s motion for summary judgment [4

NORWIN D. HOUSER, Senior Judge. Action on a written contract captioned “Option to Purchase Real Estate” dated May 4,1973, in which for a consideration of $100 Optionor Spike’s Tool and Die, Inc., a corporation, (hereinafter “Spike’s”) gave Optionee Ronald Walker the option to purchase Oscie Acres, a parcel of real estate in Jasper County containing approximately 608 acres, and to pay $800 an acre as follows: $25,000 on the dat

PREWITT, Judge. Industry Financial Corp. (Industry) filed suit against Ozark Community Mental Health Center, Inc. (Ozark) seeking the balance due on a lease. Following nonjury trial a judgment was entered 'which denied plaintiff recovery. In that same action, Ozark filed a third party petition against Henry Doss, DeWayne Melton, A.B. Dick Products Company of Joplin, Inc. and Doss & Price Office Systems, Inc. The judgment

526 S.W.2d 192 (1975) EARTHMAN'S, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Dorothy EARTHMAN, Appellee. No. 16398. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). July 10, 1975. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1975. *195 Kronzer, Abraham & Watkins, W. James Kronzer, Miriam M. Burke, Rockne Onstad, Houston, for appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defendants Capital Solutions Monthly Income Fund, LP and Transactional Finance Fund Management, LLC (“TFFM”) (Doc. No. 113) and a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defendant Todd A. Duckson (“Duckson”) (Doc. No. 117). For

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-AA-0047 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETITIONER, V.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff Bancroft Life & Casualty ICC, Ltd.’s (“Bancroft”) Motion to Dismiss GRBR Ventures, L.P.’s (“GRBR”) Second Amended Counterclaims (Doc. No. 76).1 The Court is persuaded that GRBR has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in the challenged counterclaims in its Third Am

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Willard and Patricia Rushing appeal the dismissal of their nuisance action brought against Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCS”). Concluding that the district court took an over-expansive view of federal preemption and overlooked genuine issues of material fact in entering summary judgment for KCS, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. I. Ac

HOGAN, Presiding Judge. This is a condemnation case, heard below upon the exceptions to the report of commissioners filed by Modern Tractor & Supply Company, Inc. (hereinafter Modern Tractor or the condemnee). The City of Springfield (hereinafter the city or the con-demnor) has exercised its power of eminent domain conferred by its charter to appropriate several parcels of land in the extreme southwest part of the

669 S.W.2d 612 (1984) BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OF the CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Missouri, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Sandra Kay FENTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 12924. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. April 20, 1984. *614 David F. Sullivan, Jones, Keeter, Karchmer, N

HOGAN, Judge. Plaintiffs brought this action in two counts, averring, among other things, that defendants Daugherty, Richardson, Covert, Craig and Bates, acting as officers and directors of the Bank of Raymondville, received an offer from one William L. McKnight to purchase control of the bank; that the defendants, as directors and officers of the bank, thereafter took advantage *2

OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs in these two consolidated cases are voters and taxpayers of the Cleveland School District who seek to have Ohio Substitute House Bill 269 (“H.B.269”) declared unconstitutional.1 H.B. 269 *394changed the composition and number of the Cleveland School Board by allowing the Mayor