Cases

ROBERTS, Justice. Petitioner, Florida Gas Company, seeks review of a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, 226 So.2d 115, which affirmed an adverse final summary judgment in a third party action brought by petitioner against respondent, Dickerson, Inc. The widow of Harry A. Spaulding brought an action for alleged negligence of the Florida Gas Company which resulted in the death of her

RAWLS, Judge. Facts and interlocutory issues previously considered in this cause on appellate review are detailed in Florida Gas Company v. Spaulding, 243 So.2d 129 (Fla.1971), wherein the Supreme Court quashed the opinion of this Court in Florida Gas Company v. Spaulding, 226 So.2d 115 (Fla. App.lst 1969). In the case sub judice the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida, pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule has certified the f

SPECTOR, Judge. Appellant seeks reversal of an adverse final summary judgment in a third party action brought by appellant against the ap-pellee. Appellant was defendant in a negligence action brought by the widow of Harry A. Spaulding, an employee of Dickerson, Inc., appellee herein. The decedent was a heavy equipment operator on a road construction job being performed by appellee Dickerson, Inc. The decede

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the court on the Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 34) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 55) filed by Defendant. Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Defendant” or “Equifax”). Plaintiff Arthur Hill (“Plaintiff’ or “Hill”) filed the instant lawsuit pro se, alleging violations of various provisions

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. I. Introduction On February 6, 2013, plaintiffs Sun-Trust Banks, Inc. (“SunTrust Banks”) and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (“STRH”) filed this action against defendants Turnberry Capital Management LP and Turnberry Master, Ltd., seeking to prevent defendants from proceeding with an arbitration they had commenced again

KOELSCH, Circuit Judge. On March 1, 1963, United Pacific Insurance Company issued to Jacques and Charlotte Arley, husband and wife, its standard three year policy of fire insurance covering two buildings located on the Arley’s property in Nevada. The policy had been ordered by one Roger Chaney on January 17, 1963, but at his request

ORDER ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge. A non-party, the Law Firm of Blanco Tackabery Combs & Matamoros P.A. (“BTCM Firm”), has filed a motion for a court order awarding it reimbursement expenses incurred in connection with complying with a subpoena issued by defendant Kelly. A brief background of the underlying litigation will be helpful in order to understand the issues before the Cou

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge: Further racial desegregation of the public schools in the City of Durham, North Carolina is sought by the appellants, Negro pupils and parents. Since 1960 they have continually pressed for rights and privileges assertedly accorded them by Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.E

585 F.2d 618 Warren H. WHEELER et al., and C. C. Spaulding et al., Appellants,v.The DURHAM CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Appellees.Warren H. WHEELER et al., and C. C. Spaulding et al., Appellees,v.The DURHAM CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Appellants. Nos. 77-1835, 77-1836. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued June 5, 1978.Decid

September 9 2014 DA 14-0094 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 240N BERNARD MUNYAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLOTTE KINCHELOE, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District,

MEMORANDUM OPINION GORDON, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the mandate. The relevant history of this litigation which stretches back to 1960 may be found in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Wheeler v. Durham City Bd. of Educ., 585 F.2d 618 (4th Cir. 1978) and in Appendix I of this opinion. In accordance with the mandate of the Court of Appeals,

Lynch, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Charnetsky, J.), entered March 15, 2013, which, among other things, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the parents of a child

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO

WINTER, Circuit Judge: The award of counsel fees in a school desegregation case is the subject of these cross-appeals. While the actual fee has not been fixed, the district court has ruled with respect to the basis on which the award will be made. Plaintiffs assert error on the part of the district court for failing to make an award for services rendered prior to July 1, 1972, and for excluding related litigation expenses in i

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT IGOR RACHKOV and BEST FUTURE HOMES, INC., Appellants, v. OLGA MEDVEDNIK and ELLARIY MEDVEDNIK, Appellees. No. 2D2025-1641 April 8, 2026 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Danielle Brewer, Judge.

* * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and oral argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives or amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms, with minor modificatio

497 S.E.2d 446 (1998) REUNION LAND COMPANY, D. Paulette Kerr, and Samuel W. Craver and wife, Sarah Rhodes Craver, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF MARVIN, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. COA97-749. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 7, 1998. Burris, MacMillan, Pearce & Mayer, L.L.P. by Robert N. Burris, Charlotte, for p

80 Cal.App.2d 884 (1947) Guardianship of the Person and Estate of JOHN ALDEN KIMBALL, a Minor. MAY A. SORENSEN, Respondent, v. FRANCES CHARLOTTE ENGELHARDT et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 15793. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. July 18, 1947. Lindstrom & Bartlett for Appellants. David Spaulding for Respondent.

406 F.Supp.2d 585 (2005) In re COTTON YARN ANTITRUST LITIGATION. No. Civ.A.1:04 MD 1622. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. November 9, 2005. *586 *587 Aaron F. Biber, Mansfield Tanick & Cohen, P.A., Heidi M. Drewes-Silton, Richard A. Lockridge, W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge Grinda

Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLC, 2012 NCBC 14. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 08 CVS 4333 REVOLUTIONARY CONCEPTS, INC., a North Carolina corporation, Plaintiff, v. CLEMENTS WALKER PLLC, a North Carolina professional limited liability company;