Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charles Rankin”
State of Tennessee v. Charles Rankin Zemppublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 19, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES RANKIN ZEMP Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 102768 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2014-01712-CCA-R3-CD – Filed June 10, 2015 The Defendant, Charles Rankin Zemp, pled guilty to one count of driving under the influence (DUI),
Rankin v. Wolfsonpublic domain
DISMISSED.
Millard v. Rankinpublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge Plaintiffs are registered sex offenders under the Colorado Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”), C.R.S. §§ 16-22-101, et seq. In this civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 they seek declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that continuing enforcement of the requirements
Rankin v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. The appellant, Richard Allen Rankin [“Rankin”], seeks review of an order placing a lien on his inmate account pursuant to section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2004). The State concedes error, and the trial judge has acknowledged the error. We reverse. On September 1, 2004, Rankin appealed the denial of his motion for post conviction relief. On January 27, 2005, at the request of the clerk of the
State v. Rankinpublic domain
Fairhurst, J. (concurring in the majority) — I agree with the majority that the Court of Appeals should be reversed; however, I would confine the court’s conclusion to the facts in this consolidated case and would clarify how the result could differ in other factual circumstances. This matter involves two cases that raise the issue of whether a police officer requesting identification from a passenger in a v
Charles Austin and Esther J. Austin v. Douglas Rexford Rankin and Elizabeth Ann Rankin IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Rankinpublic domain
Grosse, J. Because these two cases involve an identical issue, we consolidate them for the purpose of issuing a single opinion. An innocent passenger in a motor vehicle that is involved in a traffic stop enjoys undiminished privacy rights despite status as a passenger. Nevertheless, nothing prevents police officers from requesting identification of a passenger under the same circumstances that they can request
Rankin v. Statepublic domain
41 S.W.3d 335 (2001) Todd R. RANKIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-98-192-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 15, 2001. *337 Danny D. Burns, Fort Worth, Attorney for Appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. District Atty.; Charles M. Mallin, Ass't D.A., Chief of Appellate Section; Tanya S. Dohoney, Jay Lap
261 S.W.3d 93 (2008) Emmalene RANKIN, Appellant, v. METHODIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO, LTD., LLP, d/b/a Methodist Hospital; Wendell C. Schorlemer, M.D. and Robert Schorlemer, M.D., Appellees. No. 04-07-00305-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. March 5, 2008. Rehearing Overruled June 19, 2008. *95
State v. Rankinpublic domain
JjDREW, J. Vernell Rankin, Jr. seeks review of his conviction and three-year sentence for second degree battery. La. R.S. 14:34.1. Rankin pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain in which the state agreed to dismiss a charge of simple arson, to reduce the initial charge of aggravated battery to second degree battery and to imposition of a sentence which would not exceed three years. Rankin’s court-appointed
Rankin v. Pullenpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This case is before this Court upon an appeal of a final order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County entered on January 6,1998. The appellant and plaintiff below, Sherrill Rankin (“Rankin”), appeals the entry of summary judgment in favor of the appellee and defendant below, Joyce Pullen (“Pullen”). Rankin was injured while working at the Double O’s Restaurant, a business that was located in a bu
Rankin v. City of Fort Smithpublic domain
990 S.W.2d 535 (1999) 337 Ark. 599 Bill RANKIN, Appellant, v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, et al., Appellee. No. 98-00037. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 27, 1999. *536 Oscar Stilley, Fort Smith, for appellant. Jerry Lee Canfield and Barry D. Neal, Fort Smith, for appellee City of Fort Smith. Charles
Kolstad v. Rankinpublic domain
179 Ill. App.3d 1022 (1989) 534 N.E.2d 1373 CHARLES KOLSTAD et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BRUCE RANKIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-88-0799. Illinois Appellate Court Fourth District. Opinion filed March 2, 1989. *1023 *1024 Marc J. Ansel, of Erwin, Martinkus, Cole &
People v. Rankinpublic domain
Egan Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered August 24, 2012, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. *1
699 F.2d 1010 James W. BROOKS, Petitioner,v.Honorable Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, UnitedStates Department of Labor, Respondent.Charles RANKIN, Petitioner,v.Honorable Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, UnitedStates Department of Labor, Respondent. Nos. 81-7653, 82-7149. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted No
Pleasant Hills Const. Co., Inc. v. Borough of Rankinpublic domain
707 A.2d 639 (1998) PLEASANT HILLS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF RANKIN. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 5, 1997. Decided February 25, 1998. *640 Charles F. Scarlata, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Gregory A. Castelli, Pittsburgh, for appellee. Before DOYLE and SMITH, JJ., and NARI
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-26-00065-CV ———————————— Manfred T. Sterl, Appellant v. Beverly Mitrisin, Charles Thomas Nations, Brian Hooper, Mike Jansta, Mike Hayward
Rankin v. Brinton Woods of Frankford, LLCpublic domain
Sharer, J. Willie Charles, Jr. died during his brief stay as a patient at Brinton Woods of Frankford, LLC. Thereafter, appellants, Marcia Rankin, individually and as personal representative of her father's estate, Mark Allen, and Dawn Tracey brought, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a negligence action for survival and wrongful death claims against several Brinton Woods entities
State v. Charlespublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-628 No. COA21-792 Filed 20 September 2022 Cumberland County, No. 20 CRS 56732 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHEITO CHARLES, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 1 July 2021 by Judge James F. Ammons, Jr., in Cumberland County Superior Co
State v. Charlespublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-628 No. COA21-792 Filed 20 September 2022 Cumberland County, No. 20 CRS 56732 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHEITO CHARLES, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from judgment entered 1 July 2021 by Judge James F. Ammons, Jr., in Cumberland County Superior Co