Cases

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Charles Morales appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Alan H. Nevas, J., holding that it retained jurisdiction to extend and modify his term of supervised release. Morales had pled guilty to a violation of the narcotics laws, and had received a prison sentence followed by a period of supervised release

BARRON, Circuit Judge. Mario Gilberto Morales-Morales (“Morales”) petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying Morales’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny the petition. I. Morales is a citizen of Guatemala. He e

PER CURIAM. In February 2002, Morales, pro se, filed a section 2254 petition in the district court challenging his Kings County conviction for possession and sale of a controlled substance. In his petition, Morales argued that his arrest was not supported by probable cause and his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to raise a claim tha

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jose Antonio Morales appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons state

OPINION Justice McCAFFERY. This is a direct appeal from a death sentence imposed after a jury convicted Appellant of one count of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. The jury concluded, with respect to imposition of sentence, that the aggravating circumstances (committing murder to prevent testimony in a possible criminal proceeding regarding a felony and committing a killing in perp

Affirmed

Opinion CHIN, J. Proposition 47, an initiative measure the electorate passed in November 2014, reduced certain drug-related and property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors. The measure also provided that, under certain circumstances, a person who had received a felony sentence for one of the reduced crimes could be resentenced and receive a misdemeanor sente

DREW, J. |! Edgar Morales appeals a judgment awarding primary domiciliary custody of his twin daughters to their mother, Rebecca Leeann Ramsey. Having thoroughly reviewed these consolidated records, we find no abuse of discretion below, and we affirm. BACKGROUND In 2008, at the age of 18, Leeann Ramsey and her significant other, Kayla Bennett, moved into the home of Edgar and Rebecca Moral

OPINION PER CURIAM. I. INTRODUCTION This appeal arises from an accident in a parking lot in which a vehicle driven by Ronda Martens struck pedestrian Juan Martinez-Morales as he crossed the lot. A jury found that Martens was not negligent, and the superior court entered final judgment in her favor, awarding her costs and attorney's f

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION OF THE COURT John H. Wilson, J. Defendant is charged with assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00), and endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10), both class A misdemeanors; attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00) and menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15), both class B misdemeanors.* By o

OPINION Jane Bland, Justice In this appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of a medical expert report, the medical providers contend that the trial court erred in concluding that the record does not demonstrate a health care liability claim subject to the Texas Medical Liability Act’s expert report requirements. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &. Rem. Code Ann. § 74.351(a) (West Supp.2015

MEMORANDUM ** Charles Singleton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting motions to dismiss and for summary judgment in Singleton’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging interference with the free exercise of his Muslim religion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni 31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam),

PER CURIAM. We deny Leonardo Morales’ (“Morales”) petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

*555SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Luis Ramon Morales, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic and a lawful permanent resident of the United States, seeks review of a January 5, 2006 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying his motion to reconsider a motion to reopen removal proceedings. Morales argues that, because he acquired United States citizenship from

MEMORANDUM ** Adela Morales-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of *435discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition

MEMORANDUM ** Adela Morales-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of *435discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition

*555SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Luis Ramon Morales, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic and a lawful permanent resident of the United States, seeks review of a January 5, 2006 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying his motion to reconsider a motion to reopen removal proceedings. Morales argues that, because he acquired United States citizenship from

OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Leventhal, J. Defendant stands charged in this indictment with one count of criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 *696[3]), a class A misdemeanor, for writing a letter to the complainant in violation of an order of protection. Defendant and the People will be ready for trial within days.

PER CURIAM. Orlando Morales appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief wherein he alleges vindictive sentencing for failure to accept a plea offer. This court has taken judicial notice of its file in Morales v. State, 869 So.2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). In that motion, the trial court denied, after an evidentiary hearing, the claim of defendant-appellant Morales that his trial