Cases

Opinion Toomey, Judge: ¶1 This case comes before us on an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of Rodney Nelson’s motion to amend his answer to assert a compulsory counterclaim. Nelson contends the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to amend because, in his view, the court “had

Opinion DAVIS, Judge: T1 Roduey Nelson appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Reggie Lewis, We reverse and remand. BACKGROUND T2 Nelson negotiated to purchase Lewis's right to operate a Nutty Guys supply route. Nelson began making payments to Lewis and had paid approximately $11,000

OPINION HUDSON, Judge. {1 Appellant, the State of Oklahoma, charged Appellee Nathan Charles Nelson in Tulsa County District Court, Cage No. CM-2014-1815, with Obstructing an Officer (Count 1), in violation of 21 0.8.2011, § 540; Resisting an Officer (Count 2), in violation of 21 0.8.2011, § 268; Failure to Carry Insur*1115ance/Security Verification Form

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cynthia Bridges, Sec., Dept. of Rev., State of Louisiana v. Nelson Industrial Steam Co., 14-1250 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/24/15), 169 So.3d 711, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against NISCO. AFFIRMED. CONERY, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. | kelson Industrial Steam Company (NISCO) appeals four judgments rendered against it in four consolidated tax cases. Two judgments in favor of Cynthia Bridges, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana (State) ordered NISCO to pay taxes, penalties, and interest owed. Two judgments in favor of Calcasieu Parish School System Sales and Use Tax Department as Central Collector of Sales

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-19-00082-CR CHARLES WAYNE NELSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-02435-CRF-361

RYMER, Circuit Judge: One of the most successful partnerships in the nation’s history began more than a quarter of a century ago in Kansas City, Missouri and ended in 1997 with the arrests of Ray Lewis Bowman and William Arthur Kirkpatrick. They were known as the “Trench Coat Robbers.” Their last hit, at Seafirst Bank in Lakewood, Washington, netted a record $4.4 million.

Justice BRUTINEL, opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Arizona’s judgment lien statutes, A.R.S. §§ 33-961 through 33-968, require the filing of an information statement, but do not specify the consequences of failing to do so. We conclude that failing to attach an information statement to a certified copy of the judgment does not invalidate an otherwise valid lien; rather

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cynthia Bridges, Sec., Dept. of Rev., State of Louisiana v. Nelson Industrial Steam Co., 14-1250 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/24/15), 169 So.3d 711, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against NISCO. AFFIRMED. CONERY, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., concurs specially with opinion.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. L For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Cynthia Bridges, Sec., Dept. Of Rev., State Of Louisiana v. Nel*811son Industrial Steam Co., 14-1250 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/24/15), 169 So.3d 711, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against NISCO. AFFIRMED. <

BROCK, C.J. The plaintiffs, John and Patricia Catucci, individually and as next friends of the Catucci children, appeal both a jury verdict in the Superior Court (Lynn, J.) for the defendants, Geoffrey A. Lewis, Cherylyn M. Lewis, and A.L.D., Inc., d/b/a Century 21 Country Lakes Realty (A.L.D.), and the trial court’s ruling for the defendants on their counterclaim. The plaintiffs assign error to a number of rulings of th

12/10/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 21, 2019 Session LORING JUSTICE v. KIM NELSON ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Loudon County No. 2017-CV-78 Walter C. Kurtz, Senior Judge1

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COHN, District Judge. I. Before me are the defendants’ objections to the recommendations contained in the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of October 3, 1983 that their motions to suppress the fruits of a search of their person following their arrest and to suppress the fruits of a search warrant issued and executed shortly after their arrest be denied. <

Matter of Lewis v Bogle (2020 NY Slip Op 01618) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Lewis v Bogle 2020 NY Slip Op 01618 D

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. | ,This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Otha Curtis Nelson, Sr., an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. UNDERLYING FACTS Count I — The Aucoin Matter The following facts are not in dispu

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is an inmate at the West Jefferson Correctional Facility in Bessemer. In *Page 812 his petition, he challenged the actions of the Department of Corrections in four separate disciplinary actions. The circuit court found the evidence insufficient to support two of the actions and ordered the Department to restore the lost good time to the petitioner (six months

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Former employees of Airtherm Products, Inc. (API) sued API for failing to notify them of a plant closing as required by the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-09 (2000), before API sold its business to Airtherm LLC (ALLC). Concluding that API violated the WARN Act by terminating its employees’ employment without

Judgment rendered July 16, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,353-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0184p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: THE WENDY’S COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION. │ ________________________________________