Cases

GRIFFIS, P. J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This appeal considers the effect of an untimely notice of appeal. ¶ 2. Allison Hipwell Bruton and Charles Irvin Bruton Jr. (“Chuck”) were married on August 3, 2002. Allison filed a complaint for divorce on April 24, 2012, and she was granted a divorce by a judgment entered on May 9, 2013.

621 F.Supp.2d 1114 (2007) David ALLISON, doing business as Cheat Code Central, a sole proprietorship, Plaintiff, v. Jeremy N. WISE, an individual, David Shepherd, an individual, and Stuart Wright, an individual, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-cv-00143-REB-PAC. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 26, 2007. *1116 J

418 F.2d 332 UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Charles Lee ALLISON, Appellant,v.STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 17394. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. Argued April 22, 1969. Decided October 29, 1969. Darryl B. Deaktor, Goodis, Greenfield, Narrin & Mann, Philadelphia, Pa., for appe

Judgment rendered June 30, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,038-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** ALLI

TINDELL, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. On May 9, 2013, the Lamar County Chancery Court entered an opinion and final judgment granting Allison Bruton a divorce from Charles (Chuck) Bruton. Chuck filed a petition to modify the judgment. In his petition, Chuck challenged the requirement that he pay private-school tuition and health-insurance premiums for his minor children, and he requested that the chancellor allow him to claim o

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County. The trial court found the issues in favor of the defendant-appellees, the Lees and Goodgames, and against the plaintiff-appellants, Charles and Viva Dean Allison. The Allisons appeal from that decree of the trial court. The issue for our determination is whether the learned trial court erred to reversal by its finding that plaintiff-appellants forfeited a deposit made by them. The deposit was made under the provision

Filed 10/2/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, B300575 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA022581) v. ANTWAN ALLISON, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Eric

876 N.E.2d 361 (2007) The ESTATE OF Raymond LEE, By and Through co-personal representatives Juliann L. McGARRAH and Dinah L. Merritt, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. LEE & URBAHNS COMPANY, an Indiana general partnership, and John B. Urbahns, individually and in his capacity as general partner in Lee & Urbahns, Allison Run II, an Indiana general partnership, Allison *362 Run III, an Indiana general partnership,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEREMIAH BANKS, No. 22-55512 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:21-cv-00051- v. JWH-JPR KATHLEEN ALLISON, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District

364 F.Supp.2d 716 (2005) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Roger L. SANDERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:95-CV-970. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 30, 2005. *717 James Burdette Helmer, Jr., Paul Bryan Martins, Robert M. Rice, Helmer Martins and Morgan

364 F.Supp.2d 710 (2003) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Roger L. SANDERS, et al., Relators, v. ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-95-970. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 18, 2003. James Burdette Helmer, Jr., Paul Bryan Martins, Robert M. Rice, Helmer, Martins & Morgan, and Gerald F. Kaminiski, Ass't U. S. At

364 F.Supp.2d 713 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Roger L. SANDERS, et al., Relators, v. ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-95-970. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 18, 2003. James Burdette Helmer, Jr., Paul Bryan Martins, Robert M. Rice, Helmer, Martins & Morgan, Cincinnati, OH, Don McKenna, Scott A.

Filed 10/22/20 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, B300575 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PA022581) v. ORDER MODIFYING ANTWA

364 F.Supp.2d 699 (2003) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Roger L. SANDERS, et al., Relators, v. ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-95-970. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. November 17, 2003. *700 James Burdette Helmer, Jr., Paul Bryan Martins, Robert M. Rice, Helmer, Martins & Morga

DENNIS, Cii-cuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The majority incorrectly holds that African Americans who claim to have been harmed by Citgo’s alleged unlawful racially discriminatory employment policies and practices cannot bring a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) to enforce collectively their rights and remedies afforded for such violations under both

OPINION Appellant, Allison A. Lee, who was plaintiff below, sued the appellee, Tim Killian, over injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile accident. The trial court granted summary judgment for the appellee on the basis of a valid waiver. Lee appeals on the grounds the waiver was obtained by fraud. We reverse and remand for a new trial. On November 17, 1984, appellant and appellee had a vehicle collision in a private parking lot in Huntsville, Texas.

CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR. (Retired, Specially Assigned), J. The appellant, Jacob Lee Chisum, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County by Judge W. Newton Jackson, III, sitting without a jury, of attempted second-degree murder, first-degree and second-degree assault, reckless endangerment, carrying a weapon openly, and carryi

Justice PLEICONES dissenting: I respectfully dissent and, as explained below, would vacate the circuit court’s order and remand the matter to that court for reconsideration. The majority holds that “[t]he circuit court reviews the order of the State Board under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).... ” I disagree,2 and would hold that the charter school appeal

OPINION OF THE COURT STAHL, Circuit Judge. The principal issue in this appeal is the complete retroactivity vel non of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964). Somewhat surprisingly the Supreme Court has not had occasion to speak directly on this aspect of Massiah, although virtually every other major decision in the area of criminal procedure has run the gauntlet

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-23-00224-CR LEE GONZALEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 76th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. CR20950 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef