⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Charles Eugene Phillips”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-11-20 · Published · cited 5× · 805 F.3d 1152; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20136; 2015 WL 7351939
PER CURIAM. Charles Woods seeks authorization to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, asserting the Supreme Court established a new rule made retroactive when it held in Johnson v. United States that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is unconstitutional. 576 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). The government joi
Phillips v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994-08-11 · Published · cited 1× · 890 S.W.2d 37; 1994 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 515
OPINION WELLES, Judge. The Defendant, Christopher Phillips, appeals as of right the trial court’s order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, holding same was barred by Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-102. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. The Defendant argues three issues for review. The first is whether the statute of limitations bars the filing o
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996-11-25 · Published · cited 2× · 952 F. Supp. 480; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20826; 1996 WL 774105
952 F.Supp. 480 (1996) UNITED STATES of America v. James PHILLIPS. Criminal No. H-95-265-SS. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 25, 1996. Pretrial Services, Houston, TX, U.S. Probation, Houston, TX, U.S. Marshal, Houston, TX, Kenneth Dies, U.S. Attorneys Office, Houston, TX, for U.S.A. Philip Herbert Azar, II, Houston, TX, fo
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998-11-03 · Published · cited 20× · 36 F. Supp. 2d 345; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21155
36 F.Supp.2d 345 (1998) Charles Eugene (Gene) PHILLIPS and Barbara H. Phillips, Plaintiffs, v. NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Fulton A. Jordan, Jr. d/b/a Jordan & Associates and William S. ("Buddy") Quinn, Jr., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:98CV348LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. November 3, 1998.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017-11-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-64,017-05 EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER EUGENE WIMBERLY, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 54,705-E IN THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT BELL COUNTY R ICHARDSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which K ELLER, P.J., and K EASLER, H ERVEY, A LCALA, N EWELL, K EEL, and W A
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1982-06-30 · Published · cited 2× · 21 B.R. 565; 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3801
21 B.R. 565 (1982) In the Matter of Charles PHILLIPS, Jr., Debtor. Bradford W. NOYES, Plaintiff, v. Charles PHILLIPS, Jr., Gilbert L. Rosenbaum, Trustee, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 2-82-00051, Adv. No. 2-82-0115. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. June 30, 1982. *566 Eugene C. Cushman, Tedeschi & Cushman, New
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00645-CR ——————————— EDWIN EUGENE VERNON, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00645-CR ——————————— EDWIN EUGENE VERNON, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
12/10/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 15, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAWRENCE EUGENE ALLEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-76153 David M. Bragg, Judge ___________________________________
Arizona Supreme Court · 2018-08-16 · Published · cited 5× · 423 P.3d 370
JUDGE WINTHROP, concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶116 Substantial evidence supports the jury's determinations regarding the defendant's role and criminal intent in carrying out these horrendous murders. I concur with the majority's analysis and resolution of the procedural and substantive issues raised in this appeal. I depart from my colleagues, however, on the issue of impo
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE EUGENE MOORE and ) No. ED111523 WANDA WAGNER, ) ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court )
Supreme Court of the United States · 1988-05-16 · Published · cited 117× · 98 L. Ed. 2d 877; 108 S. Ct. 791; 484 U.S. 469; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 939
484 U.S. 469 (1988) PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI ET AL. No. 86-870. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 1987 Decided February 23, 1988 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI *471 Eugene Gressman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Joel Bla
People v. Phillipspublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1979-03-12 · Published · cited 17× · 90 Cal. App. 3d 356; 153 Cal. Rptr. 359; 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 1484
90 Cal.App.3d 356 (1979) 153 Cal. Rptr. 359 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NICHOLAS EUGENE PHILLIPS, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 3065. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. March 12, 1979. *358 COUNSEL Quin Denvir and Paul Halvonik, State Public Defenders, under appointme
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
05/01/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 25, 2017 Session CAROLYN ANN TALLEY v. CLINTON EUGENE TALLEY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 12-D-1515 L. Marie Williams, Judge No. E2016-01457-COA-R3-CV
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985-01-21 · Published · cited 12× · 486 A.2d 318; 98 N.J. 235; 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2220
98 N.J. 235 (1985) 486 A.2d 318 WALTER PHILLIPS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, NEW JERSEY STATE MILITIA, MARK CURIALE AND CHARLES WATSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. and FMC CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued September 24, 1984. Decided January 21, 1985.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006-02-21 · Published · cited 3308× · 415 F.3d 1303
415 F.3d 130375 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 Edward H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, Hopeman Brothers, INC., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants. 03-1269, -1286 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT July 12, 2005, DecidedAs Amended July 14, 2005.Cert. denied by AWH Corp. v. Phillips, (Feb. 21, 2006)Appealed from Philli
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015-03-27 · Published · cited 29× · 463 S.W.3d 34; 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1599; 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 269; 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,286; 2015 WL 1408917
OPINION Gary R. Wade, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark and Jeffrey S. Bivins, JJ., joined. Holly Kirby, J., not participating. The plaintiff asserted claims for retaliatory discharge pursuant to both the common law and the Tennessee Public Protecti
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016-07-05 · Published · cited 43× · 139 A.3d 1006; 448 Md. 440
ADKINS, J. Although young people “are close to a lifelong peak of physical health, strength, and mental capacity,” 1 they are still developing in profound ways suggesting that they, in contrast to adults, are not capable of handling the more dangerous elements this world o
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-74,391
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975-02-20 · Published · cited 15× · 512 F.2d 615; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 16006
PER CURIAM. Eugene Dobson was tried before a jury in two consolidated cases and convicted of the unlawful possession, forgery and uttering of United States Treasury Social Security checks which had been stolen from the mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 495 and 1708. On appeal two contentions are made as grounds for reversal: (1) That it was error to all