Cases

770 S.W.2d 215 (1989) The UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE and John R. Johnson, M.D., Appellant, v. Honorable Earl O'BANNON, Judge, Jefferson Circuit Court, Archie B. Hall and Elina Hall, real parties in interest, Appellees. No. 87-SC-604-MR. Supreme Court of Kentucky. February 9, 1989. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1989. Roy Kimberly Snell, Stites & Harbiso

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO

WILKEY, Circuit Judge. The defendant Charles C. Diggs, Jr., United States Congressman for the 13th District of Michigan, appeals from a conviction on eleven counts of mail fraud, under 18 U.S.C. § 1341,1 and eighteen counts of making false statements to a United States agency, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001,2 following a

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendant Floyd Clark's motion [Dkt. No. 114] to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as amended by the supplement to defendant's motion [Dkt. No. 132]. The United States opposes the motion. Upon careful

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 29, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRANDON SEAN SUTTON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County No. 9293 O. Duane Slone, Judge No. E2011-00398-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 30, 2012 A Jefferson County jury convicted appellant, Brandon Sean Sutton, of first degree murder, and

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Reconsideration Motion, filed September 15, 2018 (Doc. 25) ("Reconsideration Motion"). The Court held a hearing on October 25, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court committed manifest legal error in its Memorandum Opinion and Order,

272 Md. 642 (1974) 325 A.2d 869 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WILLIAM G. WETHERALL, INC. [No. 22, September Term, 1974.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 10, 1974. The cause was argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE and O'DONNELL, JJ. Patrick G. Cullen, with whom were Richard H. Lerch an

283 F.Supp. 128 (1968) Milton J. BAUMEL, Plaintiff, v. Leonard ROSEN and Julius J. Rosen and Rosen Investment Corporation, Defendants. Earl R. WEINER and Anita L. Weiner, Plaintiffs, v. ROSEN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Leonard Rosen and Julius J. Rosen, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 14013, 14014. United States District Court D. Maryland. February 29, 1968.

OPINION ANDERSON, Justice. In this capital case, the defendant, John Wesley Stephenson, was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. In the sentencing hearing, the jury found one aggravating circumstance; “the defendant ... employed another to commit the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration.” Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-204(i)(4) (

This is an appeal by both parties from the decree of the district court fixing the valuation for taxation on lots 7 and 8, block B, Commissioner's Addition to Des Moines, on which is a building known as the Liberty Building. The Yeoman Mutual Life Insurance Company (which appears now to be known as the American Mutual Life Insurance Company), owner of the building and liable for the taxes on the property, will be hereafter designated as plaintiff, and the State Board of Assessment and Review

126 F.Supp. 235 (1954) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, General Motors Corporation, United States Rubber Company, Christiana Securities Company, Delaware Realty & Investment Corporation, Pierre S. du Pont, Lammot du Pont, Irenee du Pont, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 49 C-1071. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

This is an original proceeding in this court. It was instituted on the 2nd of November, 1936, by the Bar Committee of the Eighth Judicial Circuit for the purpose of disbarring or disciplining Verne R.C. Lacy; that on the 4th day of November, 1936, Verne R.C. Lacy entered his appearance in said cause, and waived the issuance and service of a citation; that on the 29th day of December, 1936, A.M. Spradling, a member of the Cape Girardeau County Bar, was appointed Special Commissioner to take th

FOX, J. This cause is now pending in this court upon an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction in the criminal court of Buchanan county for murder in the first degree. At the March term, 1907, of the criminal court of Buchanan county, an indictment was returned by the grand jury, charging the defendant, John Wooley, with the murder of his stepchild, Pearl Smith. Anna Wooley, wife of the defendant, John Wooley, was

McDonald sued Mabee on June 5, 1909, in the County Court of Lamar County, upon a promissory note for $300, besides interest and attorney's fees, alleged to have been executed by him and one Hollon, and to foreclose a lien under a writ of attachment sued out by plaintiff in said suit and levied upon land in Texas as the property of Mabee. Hollon was alleged to be insolvent and was not made a party defendant. Mabee answered. Among other defenses which were interposed by him he pleaded in

Original proceeding in mandamus. By such process the relator seeks to compel the respondent *Page 695 State Auditor to register certain bonds of Clark County, in the aggregate sum of over $103,000. Clark County had issued warrants which were not paid. In the application for the alternative writ here, which was taken as for the alternate writ, it is averred that such warrants were duly issued. This is not very material, because it further appears that suit

These are the second appeals in this cause. For the opinion in the first appeals see Woods et al. v. Cantrell et al.,356 Mo. 194, 201 S.W.2d 311. The present appeals (each side appealed) are from the rulings of the trial court on after judgment motions. These motions were filed after the mandate of this court went down dismissing the first appeals because taken out of time. The judgment was rendered September 15, 194