Cases

PAINTER, Judge. |! Defendant, Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC (GGLC) appeals the judgment of the trial court finding that Defendant was liable for Plaintiffs’ chemical exposures, that the exposures were sufficient to cause Plaintiffs’ symptoms, and awarding damages. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS On September 17, 2006, an explosion and fire occ

COOKS, Judge. IsThis matter involves three consolidated appeals from three separate final judgments in related cases, arising from the same accident. The plaintiffs in the three consolidated appeals are persons asserting injuries caused by exposure to smoke and chemicals from an explosion and fire at Defendant’s plant. Defendant has not denied liability for the cause of the explosion and fire, but denies the plaintiffs’ clai

Opinion filed October 29, 2009 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-09-00153-CV __________ MICHAEL E. GEIGER, Appellant V. STEPHANIE ALLMAND ET AL, Appellees On Appeal from the 10

Opinion filed October 29, 2009

PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs, Gordon Geiger and Elizabeth Geiger, brought this action against the defendant, Francis Carey, their next door neighbor, seeking money damages, punitive damages, and an order requiring the defendant to remove a fence. The complaint sounded in three counts: (1) trespass; (2) violation of Connecticut's tree cutting statute, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-560

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. CONTENTS I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...............................................573 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..............................................574 A. Ford’s Colony..................................................

Moylan, J. This is a simple case of theft by deception. At least, it should have been simple. The appellant, Lamont Jeffery Geiger, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Charles County by Judge Amy J. Bragunier, sitting without a jury, of theft pursuant to Maryland Code, Criminal Law Article, Sect. 7-104. For penalty purposes, it was a theft of property with a value of at least $1,0

Melton, Justice. Following a jury trial, Tomorris Geiger was found guilty of murder, felony murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, and various other offenses in connection with the shooting deaths of cousins Dewayne and John Bacon. 1 On appeal, Geiger contends that the

827 F.Supp.2d 607 (2011) CHARLES W. ROSS BUILDER, INC. d/b/a Charles Ross Homes, Plaintiff, v. OLSEN FINE HOME BUILDING, LLC, Beverly Olsen, Boathouse Creek Graphics, Inc., Rick J. Rubin, and Jennifer L. Rubin, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:10cv129. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. September 29, 2011.

510 Pa. 231 (1986) 507 A.2d 361 Appeal of Calvin C. and Sonia GEIGER, Appellees, v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF the TOWNSHIP OF NORTH WHITEHALL, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 24, 1985. Decided March 31, 1986. *232 Michael J. Piosa, Allentown, for appellant. Charles W. Stopp, S

687 N.E.2d 543 (1997) 293 Ill. App.3d 171 227 Ill.Dec. 293 Linda KOLTES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES PARK DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee (George Wolk, Defendant). No. 2-97-0031. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. November 19, 1997. *544 Daniel F. Konicek, Connelly &

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ZOBEL, District Judge. Plaintiff, Roland Geiger (“Geiger”), a Massachusetts resident, brought this action for defamation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, against Dell Publishing Company, Inc. (“Dell”), a New York corporation, Eyre Methuen, Ltd. (“Methuen”), a British corporation, Seymour Lawrence, Inc., d/b/a Delacorte Press (“Delacorte”), a New York corporation, and the editors and tran

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Frederick Geiger appeals from a November 2, 2007 judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Charles J. Siragusa, Judge), denying his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration1 of the court’s September 6, 2007 judgment dismissing Geiger’s complaint, which charged defendants with constitutional violations in (1) the termination of plaintiffs

306 S.W.3d 2 (2009) 2009 Ark. 193 Anna GEIGER et al., Appellant, v. HIPP LUMBER & HARDWARE et al., Appellee. No. 09-276. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 9, 2009. Motion for Rule on Clerk. PER CURIAM. Appellants filed a timely notice of appeal in this case on September 8, 2008, making the record with the transcript

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Frederick Geiger appeals from a November 2, 2007 judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Charles J. Siragusa, Judge), denying his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration1 of the court’s September 6, 2007 judgment dismissing Geiger’s complaint, which charged defendants with constitutional violations in (1) the termination of plaintiffs

412 N.E.2d 842 (1980) McCormick PIANO & ORGAN CO., INC., Appellant (Defendant below), v. Dennis GEIGER and Janice Geiger, Appellees (Plaintiffs below), Jeane Bosselmann, Appellee (Defendant below), Glen McCormick, Appellee (Defendant below). No. 3-278A34. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. November 26, 1980. *845 W.

907 So.2d 668 (2005) Cletus GEIGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D04-2474. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 29, 2005. *669 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallaha

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OWEN, Judge. On petition for rehearing this matter was reconsidered and although we deny the petition and adhere to our decision to affirm the judgment for defendants, we are persuaded to publish an opinion. David Andrew Geiger, a minor, sustained personal injuries when he drove his automobile into the rear of defendants’ van type truck at night, while both vehicl

Bailey, Judge. Case Summary Following a jury trial, Charles A. Benson (“Benson”) was convicted of Attempted Murder, as a Level 1 felony; 1 Resisting Law Enforcement, as a Level 6 felony; 2 and Criminal Recklessness, as a Level 6 felony,

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Plaintiff brought this suit under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act, LSA-R.S. 23:1021 et seq., against the defendant, the insurer of his employer, *416 Metal Building Products, Inc., alleging total and permanent disability