⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “Charles E. Armendariz and Robin Armendariz”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Stasz v. Schwabpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2004-08-05 · Published · cited 16× · 17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 116; 121 Cal. App. 4th 420
17 Cal.Rptr.3d 116 (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 420 Shanel STASZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles R. SCHWAB et al., Defendants and Respondents. Shanel Stasz, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. American Arbitration Association, Defendant and Respondent. Shanel Stasz, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Hugo W. Quackenbush, Defendant and Respondent. Nos. B159163, B162829, B163456.
Washington Supreme Court · 2004-12-23 · Published · cited 161× · 153 Wash. 2d 331; 103 P.3d 773
¶1 Like its companion case, Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc., 153 Wn. 2d 293, 103 P.3d 753 (2004), this case requires us to consider the enforceability of a predispute employment arbitration agreement in the context of employment discrimination litigation. Here, after employee Gerald Adler sued his employer Fred Lind Manor, the trial court granted Fred Lind Manor’s motion to compel arbitration under the arbitration agreement. Adler asserts
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011-06-29 · Published · cited 119× · 724 S.E.2d 250; 228 W. Va. 646
724 S.E.2d 250 (2011) Clayton BROWN, as guardian for and on behalf of Clarence BROWN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant v. GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; Genesis Healthcare Holding Company II, Inc.; Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. of West Virginia; Genesis Eldercare Corporation; Genesis Eldercare Network Services, Inc.; Genesis Eldercare Management Services, Inc.; Genesis Eldercare Rehabilitation Services, Inc.; Genesis Eldercare Staffing Services, Inc.;
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2001-05-03 · Published · cited 177× · 44 S.W.3d 200; 2001 WL 306245
44 S.W.3d 200 (2001) ANDERSON, GREENWOOD & CO., Appellant, v. Warner G. "Buck" MARTIN, Kevin P. Martin, Nibsco Supply, Inc., Niabco Equipment & Industrial Sales, Inc., Nibsco Equipment & Industrial Sales of Ohio, Inc., Nitram Energy Inc., Flow Safe, Inc., Flow Safe Supply, Inc., and Irving Shuman, Appellees. No. 14-98-01274-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).
Washington Supreme Court · 2000-11-09 · Published · cited 87× · 142 Wash. 2d 347; 13 P.3d 183; 2000 Wash. LEXIS 830
Talmadge, J. (dissenting) — Today, the Washington Supreme Court strikes down legislation designed to assist the vulnerable and fundamentally alters the judicial treatment of the police power, an attribute of government long-recognized everywhere as essential to our fundamental notions of ordered liberty. Today, the Washington Supreme Court revives the Lochner24 era, when a conservative United States Su
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
Washington Supreme Court · 2005-01-07 · Published · cited 22× · 103 P.3d 773
103 P.3d 773 (2004) Gerard ADLER, Petitioner, v. FRED LIND MANOR, a corporation Mark Mullen, an individual and Jane Doe Mullen, and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents. No. 74701-6. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued June 8, 2004. Decided December 23, 2004. As Corrected January 7, 2005.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, C.D. California · 2010-11-30 · Published · cited 90× · 754 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2010 WL 4867562
754 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNITENDED ACCELERATION MAKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. This document relates to: All economic loss cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 30, 2010. *1151 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton B. Fisher, Jayne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 313× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Washington Supreme Court · 2000-11-09 · Published · cited 59× · 13 P.3d 183
13 P.3d 183 (2000) MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITIES OF WASHINGTON, a nonprofit Washington Corporation, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Washington; and Mobile Home Owners of America, Inc., a corporation, Respondent. No. 66831-1. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued March 7, 2000. Decided November 9, 2000. *184
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under