Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction.. .293 II. Factual Background.. .293 A. Sheldon Rabin, M.D., P.C... .293 B. Plaintiffs Education and Training. . .293 C. Plaintiffs Employment.. .294 III. Arguments of the Parties..

Karen LeCraft Henderson, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, both Palestinian nationals and Palestinian Americans, claim the defendants, pro-Israeli American individuals and entities, are conspiring to expel all non-Jews from territory whose sovereignty is in dispute. 1 They sued in federal district court, pressi

184 Cal.App.4th 808 (2010) 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 307 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CARMELLA LIGONS, Defendant and Appellant. No. B212616. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. May 13, 2010. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *810 Joseph S. Klapac

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LUNGSTRUM, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Amend His Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 15 (doc. 127); (2) Defendants’ request for Rule *68111 sanctions based on Plaintiffs filing of his Motion to Amend (doc. 177); (3) Defendants’ Motion to Am

OPINION OF THE COURT Prudenti, P.J. On the morning of March 26, 1999, the appellant, Sheldon S., assaulted three women and sexually abused two of them during a sudden outburst of violence in an apartment building in Brooklyn. On June 12, 2000, Sheldon S. entered a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect to a 21-count indictment, which charged him with various degrees of burglary, assau

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 90 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 91 OPINION Following a jury trial, John Sok was convicted of two counts of attempted murder with related fire

53 F.Supp.2d 1157 (1999) Dave SHELDON, Plaintiff, v. Jay VERMONTY, et al., Defendants. No. 98-2277-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 25, 1999. *1158 *1159 *1160 Darren K. Kearns, Overland Park, KS, for Dave Sheldon, plaintiff. Jane L

OPINION Anthony E. Lawson appeals from his conviction for possession of cocaine base. He asserts several errors relating to the manner in which his sole witness testified and how he was forced to testify. We reverse. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Long Beach Police Officer Joseph Ferguson and his partner were on foot patrol one night dressed in civilian clothes when they saw appellant

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Dave Sheldon (“Sheldon”) appeals the district court’s order confirming an arbitration award in favor of defendants Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (“Schwab”), Olde Discount Corporation (“Olde Discount”), and Principal Financial (“Principal”), (collectively, the “broker-dealers”), and the district court’s judgment dismissing his claims against de

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the amount accrued to the credit of Charles F. Short, Bankrupt, in the Public School Retirement System of the State of Missouri, is “property” which passes to the Trustee in Bankruptcy under § 70(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. § 110(a)(5

OPINION Pedro Figueroa (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and a court trial in which he was found to have suffered a prior serious felony conviction within the meaning of Penal Code section 667, subdivision (a) and to have served four prior prison terms within the meaning of Penal Code section

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1455 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1456 OPINION At night, four men entered a family residence and during a one- to one-and-one-half-hour period robbe

[Cite as Cotton v. Sheldon, 2014-Ohio-756.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY PRINCE CHARLES COTTON, SR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 9-13-48 v. EDWARD T. SHELDON, WARDEN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Court

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Michael Bies (“Bies”) and respondent Warden (referred to in this opinion as “the State”) cross-appeal the district court’s order granting conditionally in part and denying in part Bies’ petition for a-writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons that fob low, we AFFIRM the district court’s gr

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1580 ___________________________ Sheldon Peters Wolfchild; Ernie Peters Longwalker; Scott Adolphson; Morris Pendleton; Barbara Buttes; Thomas Smith, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated lllllllllllllllllllll Plainti

Matter of Louis-Charles v White (2022 NY Slip Op 06009) Matter of Louis-Charles v White 2022 NY Slip Op 06009 Decided on October 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

BEA, Circuit Judge, concurring: I write separately to express my own views as to Part VI of the majority opinion, which holds that the Arizona Supreme Court applied a “causal nexus” test to Hedlund’s nonstatutory mitigating evidence, in. violation of Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). Our about-face on this issue, see Hedlund v. Ryan, 750 F.3d 793, 813-20

828 F.Supp. 1262 (1993) SHELDON COMPANY PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUST, Sheldon Company Defined Benefit Plan and Trust (Terminated); and George Cares, Paul Cares, and Louis Cares, as individuals and as Trustees of both Trusts, Plaintiffs, v. Michael K. SMITH, as an individual and as a partner or former partner in Dolinka, Smith & Van Noord, a Michigan partnership; Marvin J. Dolinka, Harold J. Smith, Kenneth Van Noord, Gerald R. Vander Lugt, an

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30324 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 6:12-cr-00010-CCL-1 KEVIN MICHAEL SHELDON, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montan

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr