Cases

MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants Charles C. Jones and Clara E. Jones, his wife, appeal from an order entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Glasser, J.) denying their motion for summary judgment in their declaratory judgment action against defendant-appellee Sea Tow Services Freeport NY, Inc. (“Sea Tow”) and staying the actio

OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Charles Jones and Josh Watson seek to hold Royal Administration Services, Inc. (“Royal”) vicariously liable for several telephone calls made in violation of the Tele *1103 phone Consumer Protection Act (“TOPA”), 47 U.S.C, § 227, by tele

MCDONALD, Judge. Charles Jones was convicted of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Iowa Code section 711.2 (2016), going armed with intent, in violation of Iowa Code section 708.8, carrying weapons, in violation of Iowa Code section 724.4, and making a false report to law enforcement, in violation of Iowa Code section 718.6. In this appeal, Jones challenges the sufficiency of

*334JUSTICE FEW : **341We address two questions in this appeal. The first question is whether a challenge to an elected official's legal qualifications to serve in the office to which he has just been elected must be brought pursuant to the administrative

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: We confront issues concerning whether and how the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Martinez v. Ryan, - U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), affects the standards for when a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (“Rule 60(b)”) motion may be filed, and for when a second or successive 28 U.S.C.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge. On December 19, 2011, Plaintiff Charles Jones, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action against Defendant H.S.B.C. [Doc. No. 1] regarding property located at 3427 Herbert Street, San Diego, CA 92103. Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee, but instead submitted a motion to pro

Denied.

PER CURIAM Granted. Under the specific facts presented, we find that relator, insofar as he was statutorily mandated to serve on a state board in his ex officio capacity as a sitting judge, is not subject to the Code of Ethics. See La. R.S. 42:1167 ("[a]ll judges, as defined by the Code of Judicial Conduct, shall be governed exclusively by the provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct..."). Accordingly, the judgment of the

JAMES C. HO, Circuit Judge: Blue Cross seeks removal to federal court under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442 , on the ground that it is sued here in its capacity as an administrator of health care benefits for federal employees. Three of

PER CURIAM Granted. Under the specific facts presented, we find that relator, insofar as he was statutorily mandated to serve on a state board in his ex officio capacity as a sitting judge, is not subject to the Code of Ethics. See La. R.S. 42:1167 ("[a]ll judges, as defined by the Code of Judicial Conduct, shall be governed exclusively by the provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct..."). Accordingly, the judgment of the

SUZANNE H. BAUKNIGHT, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This adversary proceeding is before the Court on the Complaint to Determine Nondischargeability of Debt filed by Plaintiffs on August 28, 2014, as amended on July 10, 2015 (collectively referred to as "Complaint"), seeking a judgment against Defendant in favor of Plaintiff Carl Lansden ("Carl Lansden" or "Carl") in the amount of $933,258.38, in favor of Plaintiff Robert Cash ("Bu

Judgment rendered November 16, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,797-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** UNITED HOME CARE, INC.,

Claim by prisoner of improper federal contract funding of criminal enforcement on a tribal reservation; frivolous allegations; application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. Plaintiff, Garrett Lee Jones, is “an enrolled Indian of the Red Lake Indian Reservation,” Compl. at 1, who is currently serving a 30-year sent

HUGHES, J. |TAt issue in this medical malpractice action is the extent to which the Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund (“PCF”) continues to be obligated to make advance payments for custodial/attendant care for a medical malpractice victim, after receiving information indicating that such care may no longer be needed, and whether the PCF had the right to unilaterally terminate such payments, without prior court approval,

JAMES C. HO, Circuit Judge, concurring: It is hard to imagine a better example of how far we have strayed from the text and original understanding of the Constitution than this case. The First Amendment expressly guarantees the free exercise of religion-including the right of the Bishops to express their profound objection to the moral tragedy of abortion, by offering free burial services for fetal remains. By

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mitchell Jones appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in Jones’ housing discrimina*191tion suit. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District served the respondent with a verified petition dated March 28, 2012, containing 10 charges of professional misconduct. Following a hearing, the Special Referee sustained all 10 charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. In opposition, the respondent asserts that he has an unb

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District served the respondent with a verified petition dated March 28, 2012, containing 10 charges of professional misconduct. Following a hearing, the Special Referee sustained all 10 charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. In opposition, the respondent asserts that he has an unb

GREMÍLLION, Judge. hOn January 19, 2015, two men, one masked and the other unmasked, robbed the Royal Palace Casino and employees and patrons of the casino in Calcasieu Parish. Defendant, Mr. Patrick Seth Jones, appeals his convictions on four counts of armed robbery for being the masked gunman who perpetrated the .robberies, as well as his sentences for those crimes. For the reasons that follow,

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. | ¶ This is a succession proceeding. The appellant, the Estate of Quiana Jones through its administrator Derrick Jones, Sr.1, seeks review of the trial court’s judgment granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Robert Lucien, Sr. For the reasons that follow, we deny the motion to dismiss the appeal filed by Mr. Lucien and reverse the trial court’s judg