Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4088 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES ANTHONY WALKER, JR., a/k/a Supreme, a/k/a Preme, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New B

379 U.S. 642 (1965) ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL. v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS & TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. ET AL. No. 544. Supreme Court of United States. Decided January 18, 1965.[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Donald Macleay, Richard M. Freeman, John C. Lovett, Byron M. Gray, Nuel D. Belnap, A.

Deady, D. J. This action was commenced in the circuit court for the county of Multnomah. The defendants appeared and caused it to be removed to this court. It is brought upon the undertaking of the defendants for an attachment given in the action of Ah Jim v. Ah Kow, then pending in the circuit court for the county of Clatsop, in November, 1879. The complaint alleges that in pursuance of said undertaking, and

980 F.Supp. 1381 (1996) Charles F. SAMUEL and Valerie A. Samuel, Plaintiffs, v. James MICHAUD, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial District-Idaho Judge; Quentin Harden, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial District-Idaho Magistrate; Eugene Marano, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial District-Idaho Magistrate; Gary Haman, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as 1st Judicial

PER CURIAM. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted, and the following questions of law certified to the Court of Appeals as questions of law which ought to he reviewed by said court-: (1) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Charles B. Alexander? (2) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Henry M. Ale