Cases

PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order granting a motion to compel discovery that contemplates a future order to determine the scope and breadth of the discovery and other related issues. However, as the order does not compel discovery, petitioner has not demonstrated that the order will result in irreparable harm. See Poston v. Wiggins, 112 So.3d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly, the petition

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., a foreign corporation, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually, and as successor by merger to BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, a foreign corporation, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, a foreign corporation, LIGGETT GROUP LLC (f/k/a Liggett Group,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HASTINGS FUNERAL HOME, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0373-PWG ) CHARLES W. HASTINGS, ) ) Defendant. )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SOUTHERN BAPTIST NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC. FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND D/B/A BAPTIST MEDICAL DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CENTER-SOUTH, CASE NO. 1D14-3985 Petitioner, v. JEAN CHARLES, JR., AS NEXT FRIEND AND DUL

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., a foreign corporation, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually, and as successor by merger to BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, a foreign corporation, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, a foreign corporation, LIGGETT GROUP LLC (f/k/a Liggett Group,

592 F.3d 60 (2009) Thomas WILNER, Gitanjali Gutierrez, Michael J. Sternhell, Jonathan Wells Dixon, Joshua Colangelo Bryan, Brian J. Neff, Joseph Margulies, Scott S. Barker, James E. Dorsey, Asmah Tareen, Richard A. Grigg, Thomas R. Johnson, George Brent Mickum IV, Stephen M. Truitt, Jonathan Hafetz, Tina M. Foster, Alison Sclater, Marc D. Falkoff, David H. Remes, H. Candace Gorman, Charles Carpenter, John A. Chandler and Clive Stafford Smith, Plaintiffs-

Appellate Case: 24-1061 Document: 71-1 Date Filed: 07/08/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 8, 2025

HARRISON, Judge Pro Tern. The plaintiffs, Nicholas and David de-Berardinis, appeal from a trial court judgment denying their claim for costs, legal interest, and attorney fees arising from a dispute over the construction of a house for the original plaintiff, Patricia Ewing Hendrick.1 The defendant is the builder of the house, Neff Construction, Inc. (“Neff’). For the following reasons, we affirm

923 So.2d 303 (2005) J.D. v. TUSCALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES. J.T.R. v. Tuscaloosa County Department of Human Resources. Nos. 2030911 and 2030912. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. June 30, 2005. Certiorari Denied August 19, 2005. *304 Sandra C. Guin of Burroughs & Guin, LLP, Tusc

PER CURIAM. Charles Edward Lawrenson, convicted on four counts of bank robbery, appeals from the denial by the District Court of several post conviction motions. The factual background of this case may be found in our opinion on a prior appeal from the conviction and the denial of several post conviction motions, at 298

BOLIN, Justice (concurring in part and concurring in the result). I concur in that part of the main opinion that holds that the trial court correctly concluded that it lacked general jurisdiction over GM Canada because general jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant’s contacts with the forum state are continuous and systematic and sufficient to render the defendant “at home” in the forum, and GM Ca

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 47 Bruce Higgins, Rebekka Higgins, Estate of Judy Devney, dec’d, and John L. Devney, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. Maynard Lund, Kjersti Eide, Don Eide, and Jennifer Eide, Defendants and Appellants and XTO Energy, Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., and Whiting Petroleum, Corp., Defendants and Appelle

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 47 Bruce Higgins, Rebekka Higgins, Estate of Judy Devney, dec’d, and John L. Devney, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. Maynard Lund, Kjersti Eide, Don Eide, and Jennifer Eide, Defendants and Appellants and XTO Energy, Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., and Whiting Petroleum, Corp., Defendants and Appelle

DATE: 07/17/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:31:12 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312017 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

PRESENT: All the Justices DEVINCHE JAVON ALBRITTON OPINION BY v. Record No. 191030 JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY FEBRUARY 4, 2021 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SUSSEX COUNTY William A. Sharrett, Judge DeVinche Javon AlBritton, an inmate in a sta

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 53. (concurring). General personal jurisdiction over a parent corporation "is an important and controversial area that *31lies at the intersection of civil procedure and corporate law."1 ¶ 54. I write separately to put the issue of general personal jurisdiction over a parent corporation

PRESENT: All the Justices JANE DOE, BY AND THROUGH HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, JACK DOE OPINION BY v. Record No. 200386 JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH April 29, 2021 MICHAEL L. BAKER, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WAYNESBORO Charles L. Ricketts, III, Judge Jane Doe appea

636 N.E.2d 704 (1993) 264 Ill. App.3d 403 201 Ill.Dec. 272 CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION and Commonwealth Edison Company, Respondents-Appellees. No. 1-92-1397. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. September 17, 1993.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0181p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ P

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0181p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ P