Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 9, 2016 Session CHARLES BRADFORD STEWART v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40700425 John H. Gasaway, III, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2015-02449-CCA-R3-PC – Filed June 20, 2017 ______________________

OPINION The defendant, Charles Bradford Stewart, appeals from his Montgomery County Circuit Court jury conviction of vehicular assault, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Because the defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is procedurally barred and because the defendant raises no other challenge to the judgment of the trial court, we aff

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan February 3, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 151638 & (1

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 16, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES BRADFORD STEWART Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40700425 John H. Gasaway, Judge No. M2010-01948-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 11, 2011 Charles Bradford Stewart, Appellant, was indicted by the Montgomery County Grand Jury f

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00467-CR ____________________ BRADFORD CHARLES LAMB, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _____________________________________________

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-1216 _____________________________ CHARLES A. BRADFORD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James C. Hankinson, Judge. June 25, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WETHERELL, RAY, a

Affirmed.

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. State prisoner Charles Odom appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment and dismissal with prejudice in favor of Kenan Kaizer, a former Bismarck police officer, in Odom’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking monetary damages. Odom alleges that Kaizer violated his constitutional rights by

ON REMAND POLEN, C.J. Charles Bradford, a chiropractor, originally appealed to this court from the denial *1207of his motion to dismiss the state’s information charging him with unlawful insurance solicitation in violation of section 817.234(8), Florida Statutes (1997). He argued the statute was unconstitutional. We affirmed. Bra

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Aug 05 2025, 8:54 am Charles Brackemyre, CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Appellant-Plaintiff

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff JaQuan Bradford was civilly committed to the Iowa Juvenile Home for over two years as a child in need of assis *892 tance. He later brought this action against employees of the home for allegedly violating his constitutional rights. The district court granted summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 06-2-00413-5, George L. Wood, J., entered June 20, 2008. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by unpublished opinion per Schindler, C.J., concurred in by Appelwick, J., and Agid, J. Pro Tern.

NUMBER 13-09-00254-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CHARLES WARD, ARNE NOREM, AND BRADFORD M. CONDIT, Appellants, v. EDNA DAVIS, Appellee. On Appeal from the 319th District Court

NUMBER 13-09-00254-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MEMORANDUM OPINION Austin E. Carter, United States Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter comes before the Court on the Debtors’ objection to a claim filed by the Department of the Treasury— Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). The Debtors objected to the priority asserted by the IRS regarding a portion of its claim, to which objection the United States of America, on behalf of the IRS, responded. The Co

767 F.Supp.2d 740 (2011) Valerie BRADFORD, et al., Plaintiffs v. BRACKEN COUNTY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-115-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Northern Division, at Covington. January 14, 2011. *742 Eric C. Deters, Charles T. Lester, Jr., Eric C. Deters & Associates, P.S.C., Independence, KY, f

NUMBER 13-09-00609-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant, v. IRIS PERALES, Appellee. _________________________________________

DILLIN, District Judge. Appellants are six of twenty-seven defendants named in a thirty-count indictment. Count 1 charged all defendants with participating in a conspiracy to acquire, transport, store, possess and distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (The “Mauerman conspiracy.”) The additional counts charged various of the defendants w

KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge. This is an underinsured motorist case. The issue is whether the plaintiffs under-insured motor vehicle (“UIM”) insurer has a right to intervene in plaintiffs liability action against the underinsured motorist when the UIM insurer first denied that underinsured motorist coverage applied, but later determined that such coverage may apply, conceding such at the time of the relevant intervention rulin