⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Charles Barry McCoy”

Joshua McCoy v. ATFpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2085 Doc: 89 Filed: 06/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 54 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2085 JOSHUA CLAY MCCOY; TYLER DALTON MCGRATH; IAN FLETCHER SHACKLEY; JUSTIN TIMOTHY FRASER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situ
Graham v. McCoypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 217 F. App'x 258
PER CURIAM: Jesse Thomas Graham appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and awarding costs and nominal attorneys’ fees to the Defendants.* We have reviewed the *259record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Graham v. S
District Court, N.D. California · 1989-05-05 · Published · cited 6× · 715 F. Supp. 967; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5599; 1989 WL 73474
715 F.Supp. 967 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Guy D. McCOY, Jr., and Frank Hellum, Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL REVIEW, INC., Jo Ellen H. Ross, Alan Snodgrass, Margaret Shea and Larry Magna, Defendants. No. C-88-3659 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 5, 1989. Joseph P. Russoniello, U.S. Atty., Stephen L. Schirle, Asst. U.S. Atty
District Court, N.D. California · 1990-12-05 · Published · cited 3× · 133 F.R.D. 143; 90 Daily Journal DAR 14240; 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2158; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16558; 1990 WL 193619
OPINION PATEL, District Judge. This action under the False Claims Amendments Act of 1986, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, was filed by relators Guy D. McCoy, Jr. and Frank Helium on September 16, 1988. The matter is now before the court on motions by defendants and the United States to hold a hearing in camera on the fairness of a proposed settlement and to seal all briefs related to the hearing. In addition, the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976-09-30 · Published · cited 98× · 539 F.2d 1050; 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6855
WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The defendants-appellants, James McCoy, William McCoy, Maurice Machefsky, Henry Chastang, Cleo Vaughn, and Charles Bell were convicted on one or both of two counts for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. 1 Count I charged the violation of the prohibition of
District Court, N.D. California · 1989-07-14 · Published · cited 25× · 723 F. Supp. 1363; 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1097; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11322; 1989 WL 110494
723 F.Supp. 1363 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Guy D. McCOY, Jr., and Frank Hellum, Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL REVIEW, INC.; Jo Ellen H. Ross, Larry Magna; Margaret Shea; and Alan Snodgrass, Defendants. No. C 88-3659 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 14, 1989. *1364 Thomas Steel, M. Jane L
Mendiola v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008-10-09 · Published · cited 3× · 269 S.W.3d 144; 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 7665; 2008 WL 4531715
269 S.W.3d 144 (2008) Kenneth Leon MENDIOLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-07-387-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. October 9, 2008. Barry J. Alford, Fort Worth, for appellant. Tim Curry, Criminal Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Chief Appellate Section, Sylvia Mandel, Hugo Martinez Robert Foran, Asst. Criminal Attys. for Tarrant Coun
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 69 F.R.D. 337; 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 858
MEMORANDUM DECISION MARSHALL, District Judge. These private anti-trust actions now brought solely by former Convenient Food Mart franchisees on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated are here under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2), and Sections 3 and 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 14 and 15).1 In both cases plaintiffs seek only money d
Davis v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2005-06-02 · Published · cited 30× · 169 S.W.3d 673; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 4229; 2005 WL 1294587
169 S.W.3d 673 (2005) Byron DAVIS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 02-04-064-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. June 2, 2005. *674 Law Office of James M. Stanley and Barry G. Johnson, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty. and Chief of the App
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001-11-20 · Published · cited 82× · 273 F.3d 991; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24919; 2001 WL 1471574
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER: The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service no
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
December 22, 2014 Justice Sharon Keller Presiding Judge Court of Criminal Appeals RECEIVED IN P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Austin, TX 78711 This document contains some JAN 0 5 Z015 RE: 03-13-00723CR D-1-DC-13-904021A pages that ar~ of p~or quality ""'"" A osta, Clerk at the t
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Felton, Judges Elder, Frank, Kelsey, Haley, Petty, Beales, Powell and Retired Judge Clements ∗ Argued at Richmond, Virginia CLAUDE M. SCIALDONE v. Record No. 1737-06-1 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA OPINION BY JUDGE D. ARTHUR KELSEY JANUARY
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered August 11, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,017-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** CHARLES BARNES HAYES, JR.
Mullins v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005-08-25 · Published · cited 21× · 173 S.W.3d 167; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6992; 2005 WL 2044594
173 S.W.3d 167 (2005) Henry Franklin MULLINS, Jr. a/k/a Henry Franklin Mullins, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-04-161-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. August 25, 2005. *169 Barry G. Johnson, Arlington, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Crim. Dist. Atty. and Chief of t
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 29, 2002 Session BARRY C. MELTON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 2000-264-III Rex Henry Ogle, Judge No. E2001-02689-CCA-MR3-PC December 4, 2002 The petitioner appeals the d
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 06-4058 & 06-4213 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. CHARLES M. WOOLSEY, Defendant-Appellant,
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2004-07-22 · Published · cited 1× · 144 S.W.3d 150; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 6681
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice. The State has filed a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 50, we withdraw our May 27, 2004 opinion and judgments and substitute the following opinion and accompanying judgments.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1944-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 54 F. Supp. 960; 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2527
MILLER, District Judge., On October 1, 1943, plaintiff, John C. McCoy, by his next friend, filed suit against the defendant, United States of America, alleging that he is now and has been totally and permanently disabled from following any gainful occupation since his discharge from the United States army on December 25, 1919, by reason of mental disability as particularly set forth in the complaint. O
California Supreme Court · 1986-11-13 · Published · cited 65× · 727 P.2d 711; 42 Cal. 3d 835; 231 Cal. Rptr. 518; 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2169; 1986 Cal. LEXIS 291
42 Cal.3d 835 (1986) 727 P.2d 711 231 Cal. Rptr. 518 FRANK McCOY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. HEARST CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S.F. 24967. Supreme Court of California. November 13, 1986. *839 COUNSEL Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Wa
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007-01-10 · Published · cited 14× · 510 F. Supp. 2d 1003; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1911; 2007 WL 117939
510 F.Supp.2d 1003 (2007) HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES PROJECT FOR EXCELLENCE, INC., Antonio Bosque and Teresita Gyori, individually and on behalf of their minor children, Carolyn Bosque, Athena Bosque and Anthony Bosque; Peter Isern, Blanca Isern, individually and on behalf of their minor children, Peter Isern, Jr., Lauren Isern and Nicholas Isern; Hector Ceballos and Blanca Ceballos, individually and on behalf of their minor children, Andres Marrero, Brandon