Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charles B Williams”
Ciara Harlem v. Charles B. Williamspublic domain
SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MILLER, and RAY, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ Marc
Pedro Batista, Juan Arias and Stephanie Rubio v. Hub Group Trucking, Inc., Charles B. Williams, and John Vancepublic domain
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2024-1633 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-011969-O _____________________________ PEDRO BATISTA, JUAN ARIAS, and STEPHANIE RUBIO, Appellants, v. HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC., CHARLES
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO DAVID L. WILLIAMS, ) No. ED111625 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Charles County vs.
Angelia Dunbar v. Dennis R. Bolding and Charles E. Williams, Jr. D/B/A Mezz Fund 1, LLCpublic domain
Opinion issued August 29, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00485-CV ——————————— ANGELIA DUNBAR, Appellant V. DENNIS R. BOLDING AND CHARLES E. WILLIAMS, JR. D/B/A MEZZ
Charles Ronald Brent v. Vennit B. Mathis, IIpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-IA-01074-SCT DR. CHARLES RONALD BRENT v. VENNIT B. MATHIS, II, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF VENNIT B. MATHIS, III AND ALEXA MATHIS, MINORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/07/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: WILLIAM EDWARD BALLA
In re Williamspublic domain
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. 11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Charles Williams, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently suspended from practice. PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to
Charles "Chuck"Ormand Williams II & Cynthia A. Williams v. MS Constructors LLC D/B/A Monty Smith Companypublic domain
SET ASIDE AND REMANDED: Opinion issued October 18, 2012. In The Qnitrt uf Appia1 Fjffl! Thatrict tf xu at Jattw No. 05-1I-01392-CV CHARLES “CHUCK” ORMAND WILLIAMS Ii AND CYNTHIA A. WILLiAMS, Appellants V. MS CONSTRUCTORS LLC D/B/A MONTY SM ITH COMPANY, Appellee
State of Tennessee v. William Charles Burgesspublic domain
OPINION Robert H. Montgomery, Jr., J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which D. Kelly Thomas, Jr., and Timothy L. Easter, JJ., joined. The Defendant, William Charles Burgess, was convicted by a Knox County Criminal Court jury of one count of preventing or obstructing an arrest and two co
In Re: Gregory F. Williams, Sr.public domain
*1010 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM |-i This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Gregory F. Williams, an attorney licensed -to; practice law in Louisiana'but currently on interim suspe
Charles J. and Cynthia B. Evans v. United Bank, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2015 Term _______________ FILED June 16, 2015 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 14-0291 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
In Re Williamspublic domain
62 So.3d 751 (2011) In re Carl V. WILLIAMS. No. 2010-B-2759. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 10, 2011. *752 Charles Bennett Plattsmier, Gregory Lynn Tweed, Baton Rouge, for Applicant. The Schiff Law Corporation, Leslie J. Schiff, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by
Charles B. Thomas v. United Statespublic domain
*307 EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Charles Thomas is serving a term of 300 months’ imprisonment for possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal. United States v. Thomas, 210 F.3d 377, No. 99-2455 (7th Cir. Feb.7, 2000) (unpublished orde
Williams v. PRK Funding Servs., Inc.public domain
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on several pending motions and sua sponte on the Court's Order to Show Cause Regarding Service. Dkt. # 108. The motions pending are: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Direct Expungement ("Expungement Motion"). Dkt. # 116. 2. Defendants K
Johnson v. Williams (In re Williams)public domain
MEMORANDUM-OPINION JOAN A. LLOYD, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Alicia C. Johnson in her capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) against Defendant The Bank of New York Mellon (“The Bank”) and the Response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of The Bank. The Court considered the Trustee’s Motion and Supporting Memorandum of
Fiala v. B & B Enterprisespublic domain
POSNER, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises out of a RICO class action suit that the district judge dismissed without deciding whether to certify it as a class action. The appeal is from the judge’s denial of the defendants’ application for an award of their attorneys’ fees under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. The principal defendant, B & B Enterprises, is a residential real estate developer, mostly of high-
Williams v. Perduepublic domain
TREVOR N. McFADDEN, U.S.D.J. Federal courts, like museums, have different portals for different people. A hapless tourist who enters through the employees' door may be ejected from a museum, even if he were otherwise entitled to be there. Similarly, a plaintiff who comes into federal court through the federal removal process may find his case thrown out, even if it could have properly arrived there another way. Such is the plight of
Schott v. Williams (In re Williams)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION DOUGLAS D. DODD, Bankruptcy Judge. Plaintiffs Martin A. Schott, chapter 7 trustee, the United States of America, Guaranty Bank & Trust Company, Ryland Enterprises, Inc., and American Forestry Service of Miss., Inc., sued to deny a discharge to debtors Peter and Alfreda Williams under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4). Plaintiffs alleged that the debtors knowingly and fraudulently misstate
NUMBER 13-03-072-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ CHARLIE WILLIAMS A/K/A CHARLES WILLIAMS, ET AL. , Appellants,
Williams v. Statepublic domain
By the Court, PICKERING, J.: *305The United States Constitution prohibits parties from exercising peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race. When a defendant claims that the State has removed a potential juror because of the juror's race, the law requires the district judge to conduct a three-step inquiry. If, after conductin
In re Williamspublic domain
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS JjPER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter arises from one count of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Charles Williams. We previously suspended respondent from practice for a minimum term of two years. Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Williams, 498 So.2d 727 (La.1986) (“Williams F). Our judgment in William