Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charlene D. Burnett”
Burnett, Charlenepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-73,532-01
People v. Burnettpublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered May 6, 1993, convicting her of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the 15-year-old
Burnett v. Foleypublic domain
OPINION The question for decision on this appeal is whether, under the facts recited herein, appellants, all of whom are licensed real estate salespersons, are entitled to recover from the Real Estate Recovery Fund established pursuant to TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 6573a, sec. 8 (Vernon Supp. 1982-1983) (Real Estate Act). The pertinent section of this Act provides, generally, that the fund shall be used for the reimbursement of "aggrieved persons" who
Novic v. Midland Funding, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge Plaintiff Charlene Novic (“Plaintiff’ or “Ms. Novic”) initially brought this action' against Defendants Credit One Bank, N.A. (“Credit One”), Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, LLC (collectively, “Midland”), Trans' Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), Equifax Information Services, LLC, (“Equifax”), and Experian Information Solutio
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Charlene Burnett filed this action against James H. Woodall, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and fifty unnamed individuals. The complaint asserted violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (USCPA), Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-1 et s
Charlene Sekula, Claimant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendantpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Charlene Sekula, Claimant v. Case No. 13-cv-393-SM Opinion No. 2014 DNH 230 Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), claimant, Charlene Sekula, moves to reverse or vacate th
Nichols v. G.D. Searle & Co.public domain
OPINION DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs in this consolidated appeal are 116 women who filed products liability actions against defendant G.D. Searle & Company (“Searle”) in the District of Maryland from 1987-1991 alleging that they were injured by the Cu-7 intrauterine device manufactured by Searle. The district court granted Searle’s motion to dismiss these actions for lack of personal juri
Williams v. Facebook, Inc.public domain
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge *1046I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") is a global social media and networking company. It owns and operates a website and smartphone applications for Android and iOS such as Facebook Messenger and Facebook Lite. In March 2018, the news website Ars Technica reported Facebook
People v. Burnettepublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), rendered December 13, 1984, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Farlo, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress a statement made by her to a law enforcement officer.
Baker v. Universal Die Casting, Inc.public domain
725 F.Supp. 416 (1989) Charlene W. BAKER, Ronnie T. Ballentine, Marcella J. Bell, Marvin Berryhill, G. Tom Berryhill, Gerald F. Gowman, Joe S. Brashears, Shirley J. Brewer, *417 Willie Brooks, Bobby J. Brown, Tom H. Bryant, Hershel C. Bryant, Henry R. Burnett, Willene Burroughs v. UNIVERSAL DIE CASTING, INC., Louis Zachary. Civ. No. 89-6071. United States District C
West v. Chrismanpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court upon Appellant John William West’s (“West”) appeal (Doc. 15) of the Bankruptcy Court’s Order finding that Appellee Aleta Chris-man (“Aleta”), as Personal Representative of the Estate of E. Boyer Chrisman (“Estate”) and as Co-Trustee of the E. Boyer Chrisman Amended and Restated Trust, dated June 28,
Palmquist v. Shinsekipublic domain
ORDER ON POST-VERDICT MOTIONS TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT, FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND FOR NEW TRIAL JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. Faced with an adverse jury verdict in this action for retaliation in violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., Mark S. Palmquist seeks to amend the judgment to grant him mixed-motive remedies, judgment as a matter of law, and, in the alter
Taylor v. Town of Atlantic Beach Election Commissionpublic domain
363 S.C. 8 (2005) 609 S.E.2d 500 Charlene TAYLOR, John Sketers and Delores Wilson, Appellants, v. TOWN OF ATLANTIC BEACH ELECTION COMMISSION, Irene Armstrong, Jake Evans, and Sherry Suttles, Respondents. No. 25940. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard September 21, 2004. Decided February 14, 2005. Rehearing Denied Marc
991 F.2d 1195 Sharon L. NICHOLS, David R. Nichols, Virginia Ann Callan,Charles Oliver Richardson, III, Marilyn Goodman, Thomas J.Goodman, Debra A. Lopez, Rudolph Lopez, Sharon RuthAnderson, Rosemary Madrid Castaneda, Jesse Castaneda, KarenLeslie-Lloyd, Jacqueline Templin, Katherine Galati Novick,Karen Janet Davis, Peggy Lee Patterson, Michelle James,Patricia Ann Ehlert, Dana Messerly, Raymond Leroy Messerly,Susan Gail Pa
In Re Sendmygift. Com, Inc.public domain
280 B.R. 667 (2002) In re SENDMYGIFT.COM, INC., Debtor. No. 00-35021. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. July 3, 2002. *668 *669 David Hoiland, Minneapolis, MN, for SendMyGift.com. Ralph V. Mitchell, Minneapolis, MN, for Steve & Charlene Houle, Jean Peterson, Jere
392 B.R. 561 (2008) In re TELEGLOBE COMMUNICATIONS CORP. et al., Debtors. Teleglobe USA, Inc. et al., Plaintiffs, v. BCE Inc. et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-11518 (MFW). Adversary No. A-04-53733(MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. August 7, 2008. *567 David C. Albalah, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, Rita
Longo v. Greg O'Berry, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Knabb v. Reconstruction Fin. Corp., 144 Fla. 110, 197 So. 707 (1940); Burnett v. Brito, 478 So.2d 845, 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Britt, 393 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Mogul v. McClaskey Realty, Inc., 309 So.2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 324 So.2d 87 (Fla.1975); Kitsos v. Stanford, 291 So.2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA),
Mathis v. United Homes, LLCpublic domain
607 F.Supp.2d 411 (2009) Dewitt MATHIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED HOMES, LLC, United Property Group, LLC, Yaron Hershco, Galit Network, LLC, Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp., Joseph D. Gaeta, Marios Sfantos, U.S. Bank, N.A., and XYZ Corporation, Defendants. Miles McDale & Lisa McDale, Plaintiff, v. United Homes, LLC, et al., Defendants. Charlene Washington, Plaintiff, v. United Homes, LLC, et al., Defendants. <
Henney v. Henneypublic domain
605 P.2d 503 (1979) 100 Idaho 739 Ronald Arthur HENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charlene Ann HENNEY, Defendant-Respondent. No. 12924. Supreme Court of Idaho. December 27, 1979. Rehearing Denied February 15, 1980. Lowell N. Hawkes, Burnett, Woodland & Hawkes, Pocatello, for plaintiff-appellant. Richard L. Harris, Ca
Thomas v. New York State Division of Parolepublic domain
S. Miller, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order, with the following memorandum: I do not agree with my colleagues that the determination of the Division of Parole denying the petitioner’s application for parole should be upheld. Rather, as will be detailed herein, this case is of the rare variety in which the decision denying parole is irrational and improper and should be set aside. I O