Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charlene A Reese”
Reese v. Statepublic domain
14 So.3d 913 (2009) John Loveman REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC07-1309. Supreme Court of Florida. March 26, 2009. Rehearing Denied July 2, 2009. *915 Frank J. Tassone, Jr., Jacksonville, FL, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Meredith Charbula, Assistant Attorney Gener
Reese v. Virginia International Terminals, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER F. BRADFORD STILLMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the plaintiffs motion to disqualify Lance A. Jackson, Esq., and the law firm of Montagna Klein Camden, L.L.P. (“Montagna Klein”), as counsel for defendant International Longshoremen’s Association, Local 1248 (“ILA Local 1248”) in this matter. ECF No. 29. The plaintiff filed his motion, together with a suppo
Chisholm v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Reese v. Hung Kim Wongpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 53 A buyer appeals from that portion of a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding him $35,000 in damages from sellers for breach of a contract to sell him certain real property. The amount of the award was based on the difference between the contract price and the fair market value of the property at the tim
PRYOR, Circuit Judge: John Loveman Reese, a Florida prisoner sentenced to death for the murder and sexual battery of Charlene Austin, appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Reese contends that, during the sentencing phase of his trial, the lead prosecutor made several improper arguments that persuaded the jury to recommend a death sentence, in violation of his right to due process, and that the decis
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT March 30, 2012
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-18-00032-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF § JOSEPH ABRAHAM, JR., A/K/A Appeal from JOSEPH (SIB) ABRAHAM, JR.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-18-00089-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE ESATE OF § JOSEPH ABRAHAM, JR. A/K/A Appeal from JOSEPH (SIB) ABRAHAM, JR. §
CORDELL TUTT vs STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CORDELL TUTT, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-680 LT Case No. 1992-CF-004884-C-O STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________
Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.public domain
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. This is the second round of a protracted litigation to establish priority of invention between Stampa et al.’s U.S. Patent No. 6,084,100 (“the ’100 patent”), assigned to Medichem, S.A. (“Medichem”), and Jackson’s U.S. Patent No. 6,093,827 (“the ’827 patent”), assigned to Rolabo, ,S.L. (“Rola-bo”). In the first round, appealed to this court, we remanded
Wakeland v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.public domain
996 F.Supp. 1213 (1998) Billy J. WAKELAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-1091-BH-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 5, 1998. *1214 *1215 Christopher E. Peters, J. Keith Givens, Angela J.
Willard McCarley v. Bennie Kellypublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0145p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - WILLARD MCCARLEY, -
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Charlene Burnett filed this action against James H. Woodall, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and fifty unnamed individuals. The complaint asserted violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (USCPA), Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-1 et s
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Willard McCarley v. Bennie Kellypublic domain
OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Petitioner Willard McCar-le/s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. McCarley argued in his petition that the Ohio Court of Appeals unreasonably applied clearly established Sixth Amendment law by allowing a child psychologist to rea
Flamer v. Chaffinchpublic domain
827 F.Supp. 1079 (1993) William Henry FLAMER, Plaintiff/Petitioner, v. Darl CHAFFINCH, Raymond P. Callaway, Harold K. Brode, William H. Porter, Defendants, and Robert Snyder, Respondent. Civ. A. No. 87-546-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 30, 1993. *1080 *1081
Nguon v. Wolfpublic domain
517 F.Supp.2d 1177 (2007) Charlene NGUON, et al, Plaintiffs, v. Ben WOLF, et al, Defendants. No. SACV 05-868 JVS(MLGx). United States District Court, C.D. California. September 25, 2007. *1178 Anne K. Richardson, Dan Stormer, Hadsell and Stormer, Pasadena, CA, Christine P. Sun, Hector O. Villagra, ACLU of Southern California, Los
Mills v. Abbottpublic domain
350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf
Shore v. AW Hargrove Ins. Agency, Inc.public domain
873 F.Supp. 992 (1995) Phyllis F. SHORE, Plaintiff, v. A.W. HARGROVE INS. AGENCY, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3:94CV435. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. January 11, 1995. *993 *994 Robert Patrick Geary, Richmond, VA, for plaintiff. Jack Willard Burtch, J
State v. Poolepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 515 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 516 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]