Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Chanel Tell”
Van Jackson v. Check 'N Go of Illinois, Inc.public domain
123 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2000) Adele M. VAN JACKSON, Lizabeth Maccogno, James Milton, Catherine Sturgess, Gwen Johnson-Harris, Laurita Cobb, Heathcliff Anderson, Katherine Newsom, Kenneth Strybel, Linda Ruth Butler, Chanel L. Tell, Bettie Talley f/k/a Bettie Perry, Tyrone Tillman, Diane Burgin, J.R. Davis, and Venus Jones, Plaintiffs, v. CHECK `N GO OF ILLINOIS, INC., CNG Financial Corporation, Jared A. Davis, David Davis, and John Does 1-10, Defendan
Van Jackson v. Check 'N Go of Illinois, Inc.public domain
123 F.Supp.2d 1085 (2000) Adele M. VAN JACKSON, Lizabeth MacCogno, James Milton, Catherine Sturgess, Gwen Johnson-Harris, Laurita Cobb, Heathcliff Anderson, Katherine Newsom, Kenneth Strybel, Linda Ruth Butler, Chanel L. Tell, Bettie Talley f/k/a Bettie Perry, Tyrone Tillman, Diane Burgin, J.R. Davis, and Venus Jones, Plaintiffs, v. CHECK `N GO OF ILLINOIS, INC., CNG Financial Corporation, Jared A. Davis, David Davis, and John Does 1-10, Defendan
Chanel, Inc. v. Casa Flora Co.public domain
94 N.J. Super. 110 (1967) 226 A.2d 854 CHANEL INC. AND CHANEL INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAINTIFFS, v. CASA FLORA COMPANY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided February 6, 1967. *112 Messrs. Levy, Lemken & Margulies, attorneys for plaintiffs (Mr. Seymour Margulies, appearing). <
Solnes v. Wallis & Wallis, P.A.public domain
ORDER ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Wallis & Wallis, P.A., and Peter Wallis’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 21, 36] and Plaintiff Stig Solnes’s Motion to Strike Supplemental Affidavit of Defendant Peter Wallis and Request for Hearing on Summary Judgment [ECF No. 43]. The Court has carefully considered the motions, all s
BROWNING, Circuit Judge: • Appellant R. G. Smith, doing business as Ta’Ron, Inc., advertised a fragrance called “Second Chance” as a duplicate of appellees’ “Chanel No. 5,” at a fraction *563 of the latter’s price.
Matter of Charity K. v. Sultani L.public domain
Matter of Charity K. v Sultani L. (2022 NY Slip Op 01085) Matter of Charity K. v Sultani L. 2022 NY Slip Op 01085 Decided on February 17, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporti
Porter v. United Statespublic domain
7 A.3d 1021 (2010) Eugene J. PORTER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 09-CM-1275. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted June 29, 2010. Decided November 12, 2010. *1023 Lisa D. Chanel, appointed by the court, was on the brief for appellant. Ronald C. Machen, Jr., United States Attorney,
Thomas R. Jones v. United Statespublic domain
KRÁVITZ, Associate Judge: Appellant Thomas R; Jones was tried before a Superior Court jury in March 2011 on charges of first-degree premeditated murder while armed, assatilt with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, carrying a pistol without a license in a gun-free zone, and possession
Van Jackson v. Check 'N Go of Illinois, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BUCKLO, District Judge. The plaintiffs took out “payday loans” from Check n’ Go of Illinois. Payday loans are short term loans at very high interest rates — here, up to 521.43% annually — for which the creditor requires as “security” a postdated check that can be cashed on the debtor’s next payday. The plaintiffs sued for statutory damages under the Truth in Lending
Whitworth v. Statepublic domain
N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge 11 Appellant Clarence Whitworth appeals his conviction for attempted residential burglary following a bench trial in Pulaski County Circuit Court. On appeal, Whit-worth argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for dismissal that challenged the sufficiency of the State’s evidence that his intent upon entering the res
Marshall v. United Statespublic domain
15 A.3d 699 (2011) Bruce E. MARSHALL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 08-CF-1372, 08-CF-1373. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 11, 2011. Decided March 24, 2011. *701 Lisa D. Chanel, appointed by the court, for appellant. James Klein, Samia Fam, and Sloan S.J. Johnston, Public
Mills v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the
State v. Cotepublic domain
BRODERICK, J. The defendant, Chanel Cote, appeals his conviction on two counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault. See RSA 632-A:2, II (1996). He contends that the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) erred by: (1) granting the State a recess to refresh the recollection of the ten-year-old victim; (2) permitting the prosecutor during closing argument to argue facts not in evidence; (3) refusing to give the jury an
State v. Dixpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Dix, 2023-Ohio-4123.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff- Appellee, : No. 112458 v. : WILLIAM DIX, :
AC Asset, L.L.C. v. Mitchellpublic domain
[Cite as AC Asset, L.L.C. v. Mitchell, 2022-Ohio-1763.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA AC ASSET, L.L.C., : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110818 v. : CHANEL MITCHELL, ET AL
Cox v. United Statespublic domain
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: After a jury trial, appellant Nelson Cox was convicted of two crimes: (1) possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, cocaine, while armed,1 and (2) *66the commission of that offense (a felony) while on release in another case.2 He was acquitted of a number of other offe
United States v. SIMSpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, GROSS, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Chanel G. SIMS Lieutenant Commander (O-4), U.S. Navy
Mallory v. Statepublic domain
703 S.E.2d 120 (2010) MALLORY v. The STATE. No. A10A1130. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 1, 2010. *121 Lance D. Dutton, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Suzanne Z. Brookshire, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. MILLER, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Quinton A. Mallory of sin
State of Tennessee v. Tevin Wayne Griffinpublic domain
09/09/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 16, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TEVIN WAYNE GRIFFIN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2018-A-656 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge ___________________________________
Gallus v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP.public domain
370 F.Supp.2d 862 (2005) John GALLUS; D. Elaine Gallus; Ina Bloom; Alexandria Ione Faller (a/k/a Alexandria Ione Griffin); for use and benefit of AXP New Dimensions Fund; AXP Mutual Fund; AXP Precious Metals Fund; AXP Equity Select Fund; AXP Small Cap Advantage Fund; AXP Partners Small Cap Value Fund; AXP Mid Cap Value Fund; AXP Small Company Index Fund; AXP High Yield Bond Fund; AXP Managed Allocation Fund; and AXP Blue Chip Advantage Fund, Plaintiffs,<