Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50235 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00298- v. JAK-2 CHANEL WILEY, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Cal

LEE R. WEST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On June 22, 2016, plaintiff Chanelle Satterfield filed suit in the District Court for Garfield County, Oklahoma, against Kailee Taylor. See Doc. 1-2. Satterfield alleged that she was a passenger in an automobile that was struck by an automobile driven by Taylor and as a result of Taylor's negligent operation of her vehicle, she (Satterfield) sustained injury. See id.

ORDER ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Wallis & Wallis, P.A., and Peter Wallis’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 21, 36] and Plaintiff Stig Solnes’s Motion to Strike Supplemental Affidavit of Defendant Peter Wallis and Request for Hearing on Summary Judgment [ECF No. 43]. The Court has carefully considered the motions, all s

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Dec 30 2016, 9:27 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Appe

514 F.Supp.2d 1353 (2007) Frankie WHITE and Leon Warner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, Defendant. CIV. A. No. 1:06-CV-1118-ODE. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 2, 2007. *1354 *1355

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge. LThe trial court dismissed1 the lawsuit of Frances Armstrong as abandoned due to the failure of any parties in the lawsuit to take any step in its prosecution or defense in the trial court for a period of three years. Mrs. Armstrong filed a motion to set aside the dismissal, which motion the trial court denied, and she now seeks our review of the trial court’s ruling. Mrs. A

J-A08034-26 2026 PA Super 126 C.M.D. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : H.M. : :

30 A.3d 783 (2011) D'Angelo JOHNSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 09-CF-1424. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted October 4, 2011. Decided November 3, 2011. *784 Lisa D. Chanel was on the brief for appellant. Ronald C. Machen Jr., United States Attorney, and Roy W. McLeese III, J

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 1, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1719 Lower Tribunal No. 21-25582 ________________ John Doe, Appellant,

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. The issue presented on this appeal is whether custody of the orphaned child, Deneke Grant, should be changed from her adult cousin, petitioner Carol White, to her uncle, respondent cross petitioner Thomas White. Deneke Grant was born on May 19, 1983, to Margarette Grant. Margarette, Deneke and Damian, Deneke’s eight-year-old half brother resided on the first floor of a smal

[Cite as EduCare Med. Staffing, L.L.P. v. Stabler, 2024-Ohio-3295.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA EDUCARE MEDICAL STAFFING, LLP, : ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 112877 v. : CHANEL STABLER,

THOMPSON, Associate Judge: Appellant Robert Alexander pled guilty to possession of marijuana on February 15, 2002, and was sentenced, without adjudication of guilt, to one year of probation. In this appeal, he challenges the September 11, 2013, judgment of the Superior Court revoking his probation and sentencing him to 180 days’ incarceration. He argues that the court lacked jur

NEWMAN, Senior Judge: Miller was convicted on three counts of misdemeanor sexual abuse of a child, his now-teenage step-daughter, in violation of *566 D.C.Code § 22-3010.01 (2001). 1 He appeals, contending that the trial court committed con

955 F.Supp. 279 (1997) GUCCI AMERICA, INC. and Chanel, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ACCENTS; E. Kramer & Company d/b/a/ Accent on You; Ellen Kramer; Adele Kauff, Inc.; Richard Kauff; Jennifer Kauff; Triangle Trading, Inc. d/b/a Miami Duty Free Zone and Steven Facella a/k/a Steven Fichella; Craig Bennett; Joanna Fels; Windsor Marketing, Inc. a/k/a Windsor Trading; Felco, Inc. a/k/a Felco Bros. Inc. and Felco International Inc.; Consolidated Traders, I

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald F. Cerio, Jr., A.J.), entered May 8, 2015. The order granted the motion of petitioners-plaintiffs to hold respondents-defendants in contempt and granted petitioners-plaintiffs costs and fees. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. *1353Mem

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald F. Cerio, Jr., A.J.), entered May 8, 2015. The order granted the motion of petitioners-plaintiffs to hold respondents-defendants in contempt and granted petitioners-plaintiffs costs and fees. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. *1353Mem

In two related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Gemayel T. appeals (1) from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (White, J.), dated March 29, 2012, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he derivatively neglected the subject children, and (2), an order of disposition of the same court dated March 1, 2013, which, upon the order of fact-finding and aft

7 A.3d 1021 (2010) Eugene J. PORTER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 09-CM-1275. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted June 29, 2010. Decided November 12, 2010. *1023 Lisa D. Chanel, appointed by the court, was on the brief for appellant. Ronald C. Machen, Jr., United States Attorney,

199 F.Supp. 748 (1961) CHANEL INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. PIERRE MARCHE, INC., et al., Defendants. PARFUMS EVYAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. PIERRE MARCHE, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. 58 C 332(3), 58 C 333(3). United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D. November 7, 1961. Kingsland, Rogers & Ezell, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.<

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. By decision and order on application of this Court dated November 22, 2011, the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent based upon a petition dated July 22, 2011, which contained 32 charges of professional misconduct, and