Cases

06/05/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 14, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DARRELL PARTIN AND CHANDA PARTIN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Putnam County No. 2015-CR-533 Gary McKenzie, Judge ___________________________________

[Cite as Williams v. Columbus, 2023-Ohio-1451.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Justin Williams, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 22AP-489 (C.P.C. No. 20CV-5212) v. : (ACCELER

Ishaq I. CHANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENGELHARD/ICC, f.k.a. Ciba-Geigy Corp., Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-13917. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Dec. 4, 2000. Appeal from the United State

[PUBLISH] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 4 2000

[Cite as B.E.R. v. Columbus City School Dist., 2025-Ohio-582.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [B.E.R., as administrator : of the estate of E.R.-R.], : Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 23AP-776 : (C.P.C. No. 21CV-5956) v.

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: Ishaq I. Chanda appeals an adverse grant of summary judgment. The trial court found that he failed to establish that he was “disabled” under the ADA, failed to pursue any retaliation claim, and failed to rebut defendant’s non-discriminatory reasons for his termination. Concluding that summary judgment was appropriate, we affirm. BA

841 F.Supp. 432 (1993) Ashok CHANDA, et al., v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, D.C. Department of Human Services, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. Civ. No. 90-2187. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 8, 1993. *433 Thomas P. Brown, III, Brown & Tighe, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. C

19 N.Y.3d 271 (2012) 969 N.E.2d 751 946 N.Y.S.2d 533 2012 NY Slip Op 3473 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SCOTT LIDEN, Appellant. No. 67 Court of Appeals of New York. Argued March 19, 2012. Decided May 3, 2012. *272 Leg

464 So.2d 626 (1985) FOTOMAT CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, Etc., Appellant, v. Joseph J. CHANDA, Appellee. No. 83-1756. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 28, 1985. *627 Stewart B. Capps of Nohrr, Nohrr, Boyd, Brushwood, Howze & Ellis, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant. R. Frazier Solsberry of Nabors,

COLBERT, J. {1 Union Pacific Railroad Company appeals an order of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, en bane, ordering it to remove all weeds, trash, and debris located in railroad rights-of-way in Oklahoma City, The primary issue on appeal is whether the Corporation Commission had subject matter jurisdiction in this matter. We find it did and affirm its order. BACKGROUND 1 2 In Septe

25 So.3d 203 (2009) Chanda Prather RICHARDSON v. Steven Todd RICHARDSON. No. 09-609. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 18, 2009. *205 Clay Williams, Williams & Nelson, Leesville, LA, for Defendant/Appellee—Steven Todd Richardson. Terry W. Lambright, Leesville, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant—Chanda Prat

309 F.Supp.2d 1313 (2004) ATLAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV-03-0349-F. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. March 5, 2004. Ambre C. Gooch, David W. Lee, Kendall W. Parrish, Mary K. Kunc, Ronald Comingdeer, Comingdeer, Lee & Gooch, Kimberly K. Brown, Williams, Box, Forshee &

AMY, Judge. ^The plaintiff alleged that the defendant urologist rendered substandard care in the treatment of her complaints. The trial court found in favor of the defendant following a bench trial. The defendant’s exception of prescription was found moot due to the ruling on the merits. The plaintiff appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Th

ORDER J. RICH LEONARD, Bankruptcy Judge. These cases are before the court on the trustee’s motions to dismiss for the debtors’ failure to contribute their projected disposable income to payment of unsecured creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B), to which the debtors have objected. A hearing on the matters was held on December 10, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. in Raleigh, North Carolina. Because res

SEMERARO, J., October 8, 1987, this medical malpractice action, following a jury trial, concluded with a verdict in favor of *348defendant, Claude M. Williams, M.D. Subsequently plaintiffs, Lillian and Robert Culp, filed a timely motion for a new trial contending this court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion in limine and in permitting Dr. Joan Waller to testify on beha

People v Robles (2018 NY Slip Op 01559) People v Robles 2018 NY Slip Op 01559 Decided on March 8, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

ORDER REGARDING BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA Magistrate Judge Shaffer This matter comes before the court on a Motion to Quash Subpoena (Doc. 24) filed on January 11, 2017, by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). BLM received a subpoena by Plaintiff in relation to her work for Defendant The Arcanum Group, Inc. (“Arcanum”). Defendant contracted with BLM to provide support staff, incl

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 12, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TAMMY MARIE HARBISON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lawrence County No. 32633 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge No. M2015-01059-CCA-R3-CD – Filed February 12, 2016 The Defendant-Appellant, Tammy Marie Harbison, entered an open guilty ple

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINDINGS OF FACT STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. [UJnder the Constitution, the first question to be answered is not whose plan is best, but in what branch of the Government is lodged the authority to initially devise the plan. This does not mean that constitutional rights are not to be scrupulously observed. It does mean, however,’ that the inquiry of federal court

309 F.Supp.2d 1299 (2004) ATLAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV-03-0347-F, CIV-03-0348-F, CIV-03-0349-F, CIV-03-0350-F. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. March 5, 2004. *1300 Ambre C. Gooch, David W. Lee, Kendall W. Parrish, Mary K. Kunc, Ronald