Cases

OPINION HAYES, District Judge: Appellant Anthony Marcos Chadwell appeals his jury conviction and sentence for being in possession of firearms while subject to a court order in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). Chadwell contends that the district court (a) abused its discretion and violated his right to be present at all stages of the trial when it permitt

GOULD, Circuit Judge, concurring in dissent: I join Judge Kleinfeld’s excellent dissent. I write only to express disagreement with that part of my colleague Judge Kozinski’s concurrence which I view as rhetoric unrelated to the substantive issue in contest. Judge Kozinski seeks to portray the dissenters as having a “dogged insistence that they’ve found a plausible

GOULD, Circuit Judge, with whom KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, concurs, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. There is no good reason why we cannot stay our mandate as a courtesy to the District Court-respondent, which has indicated its intent to file, with the United States Supreme Court, a petition for a writ of certiorari. I do not understand why my colleagues, who routinely grant stays of mandate to almost any pa

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Three bank robberies, two confessions, one defendant, and an assortment of firearms charges make up this case. Michael Henry confessed to the first two robberies but disclaimed any involvement in the third. The jury found that Henry committed all three robberies. The jury also convicted Henry of using a firearm in each robbery

ORDER SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 10), Plaintiffs Opposition (Dkt. No. 15), Defendants’ Reply (Dkt. No. 19), and Plaintiffs Surreply (Dkt. No. 21). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argume

PER CURIAM. The appellant, and his wife, Lorine Chadwell, were found guilty by a jury in the District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, on a 3-count indictment charging them with having possession, custody and control of a still and distilling apparatus for the production of alcohol; with carrying on th

356 F.3d 1198 In re Marciano ELLIS,Marciano Ellis, Petitioner,v.United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Tacoma), Respondent,United States of America, Real Party in Interest. No. 01-70724. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Rehearing En Banc Granted December 5, 2002. Argued and Submitted En Banc

313 F.3d 1094 In re Marciano ELLIS,Marciano Ellis, Petitioner,v.United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Tacoma), Respondent,United States of America, Real Party in Interest. No. 01-70724. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 5, 2002. Miriam F. Schwartz, Tacom

OPINION DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to a plea agreement with the government, the defendant, Samuel Raleigh, pleaded guilty in federal court to possession of a stolen, firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He now appeals the district court’s imposition of a sentence that (1) included an enhancement because the weapon was stolen and (2) was ord

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge Two motions are before this Court. The first motion is Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Check Into Cash, Inc. (“Check Into Cash”), NCP Finance Limited Partnership . and. NCP Finance Ohio, LLC (“NCP Finance”), PH Financial Services, LLC (“PH Financial”), Northstate Check Exchange, and Richa

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge In June 2014, Plaintiffs’ Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. (“CFSA”) and Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (“Advance America”) filed a Complaint against Defendants the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“the FDIC”), the Board of Governors of th

427 F.Supp. 692 (1977) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Arthur C. CHADWELL, Defendant. Crim. A. No. 76-137. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 7, 1977. *693 W. Laird Stabler, Jr., U. S. Atty., and John H. McDonald, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff. Henry duPont Ridgely, of Ridgely

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge The Movants, Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. (“CFSA”), and Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. (“Advance America”), ask this Court to enter two orders— the September 25, 2014, Order dismissing its claims under the Administrative Procedure Act, [Dkt. No. 62], and its December 19, 2016, Order dismissing CFSA as a

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. Larry Organek appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6861(d). He claims that his sentence constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth Amendment and also contravenes the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses o

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30269 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:18-cr-00203-BLW-1 LONNIE EARL PARLOR, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, P

731 F.Supp. 415 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark John HAGGERTY, et al., Defendants. No. CR89-315R. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. March 21, 1990. *416 Robert G. Chadwell, Denver, Colo., for the U.S. Kevin A. Peck, Seattle, Wash., for Carlos Garza. Michael Davidson, Ken

PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Linda McGraw appeals three adverse orders resulting in the denial of her claims for medical insurance benefits for physical therapy and home nursing care prescribed to treat her multiple sclerosis. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. BACKGROUND A. The Disease Multip

KRUPANSKY, Senior Circuit Judge. The defendant-appellant Arthur Hill has appealed from the sentence imposed by the district court under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Sentencing Guidelines) following his plea of guilty to 18 U.S.C. section 922(g)(1). The indictment brought against Hill on December 5, 1990, charged him with being a felon in possession of a firearm in vi

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0241p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ALFRED ROSS WINGATE, JR., ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │