Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUSMAN GODFREY LLP, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25 - 1107 (LLA) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In April 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order targeting the law firm Sus

57 F.3d 1065NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Albert Charles BURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The SUN PUBLISHING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; Bob Kudelka;Knight-Ridder, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees,and

622 F.2d 339 Thomas David CRAWFORD and Kirk Evan Crawford, by ShirleySutter, their next friend, Appellants,v.MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION and Patrick Harrison, Inc., aFlorida corporation; and Patrick Harrison, E. P. Dunaway,Nat G. Harrison, Jr., and R. H. Jackson, Trustees forPatrick Harrison, Inc., Appellees. No. 79-1801. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit.

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Harold J. Hester appeals from a judgment of the district court 1 in favor of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC), on its complaint brought under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 231-235 (1976) (now codified as 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-373

OPINION THOMAS, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether we have appellate jurisdiction over a district court order remanding to state court a class action suit alleging that a securities broker misled its customers concerning the capabilities of its on-line investment system. We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST CROIX HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION ) CASE NO SX 05 CV 165 ) Plaintiff ) COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION ) V )

Wingate, S. From the days of the Evangelists, if not earlier, it has been recognized that one of the primary duties of a fiduciary is to make productive the fund in his hands and not to keep it “ laid up in a napkin.” (Luke 19:20-23; Matt. 25:14-28.) This obligation has received repeated and universal recognition by the courts of this country since the earliest times, it being recognized that an executor or oth

ARMSTRONG, P. J. In this workers’ compensation case, claimant, now deceased, sought benefits for a work-related injury. SAIF, the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier, accepted a claim for a lumbar strain. Claimant subsequently sought acceptance of a combined condition, which SAIF accepted but then denied on the ground that the accepted injury was no longer the major contributing cause of the combined condition.

Case: 19-1793 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WILLIAM C. HARDY, BERTIE ANN HARDY, DOROTHY SCHAEFFER, EMMA TRIMBLE, FOR THEMSELVES AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF A CLASS OF SIMILARLY SITUATED PERSONS, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant _______

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 264A23 Filed 23 May 2025 DANIEL JONES v. J. KIM HATCHER INSURANCE AGENCIES, INC.; HXS HOLDINGS, INC.; GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; and GEOVERA ADVANTAGE INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2023) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 290 N.C. App. 316 (2023), affirming in part and r

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Docket 12, 13, 17, 47 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Pamela Drawsand (“Drawsand”) brings the instant action under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, among other claims, against thirty-three defendants. The parties are presently before the Court on four sets of Defendants’ respective motions to dismiss. Dkt. 12, 13, 17, 47.

952 F.Supp. 283 (1996) Doris FLEMING, Plaintiff, v. The SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. Civil Action No. 6:95-3248-20AK. District Court of United States D. South Carolina, Greenville Division. December 17, 1996. Order Denying Reconsideration January 9, 1997. *284

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH March 29, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENT

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CEDAR POINT NURSERY; FOWLER No. 16-16321 PACKING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00185- v. LJO-BAM GENEVIEVE SHIROMA; CATHRYN RIVERA-HERNANDEZ; SANTIAGO OPINION AVILA-GOMEZ, Esquire; ISADORE HALL III, Defendants-Appellees. Appea

MEMORANDUM & ORDER KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: The New York Labor Law authorizes the Commissioner of the New York Department of Labor (“DOL”) to order the withholding of payments due a contractor on a public works project if that contractor fails to pay a prevailing wage to its workers. Plaintiffs — TADCO Construction Corp. (“TADCO”), a New York public works contractor, and Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) HAMPTON DELLINGER ) in his personal capacity and ) in his official capacity as ) Special Counsel of the ) Office of Special Counsel, ) ) Plaintiff, )

Sanders, J. ¶54 (dissenting) — The issue here is whether the police can destroy property belonging to an innocent third party without incurring any liability for that destruction or, alternatively, be required to pay just compensation to the property owner who is disadvantaged for the public good. The majority, by affirming summary judgment of dismissal favoring the city, shields the government from liability for trespass as well

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court February 21, 2017.] Gordon McCloud, J. ¶1 The State of Washington bars discrimination in “public . . . accommodation [s]” on the basis of “sexual orientation.” RCW 49.60.215(1) (Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD)). Barronelle Stutzman owns and operates a place of public accommodation in our state: Arlene’s Flowers Inc. Stutzman and her public business, Arlen

Case: 20-40359 Document: 00517042176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/23/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________

FRANCOIS, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 19, 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................215 PROCEDURAL HISTORY.........................................................217 SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD......................................221