Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cathy Lynn Allen”
Allen Cobb v. Cathie Lynn Cobbpublic domain
Opinion issued February 10, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The
NUMBER 13-10-217-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG DAVID CROSSLAND AND MICHELLE CROSSLAND, Appellants, v. CATHY BERRY LANGE A/K/A/ CATHY BERRY GEARY, Appellee. On appeal from the 347th District Court
Rebecca Lynn Barker v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00345-cr TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS
Rebecca Lynn Barker v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00345-cr TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS
Haden v. Rioupublic domain
90 S.W.3d 538 (2002) Glen J. HADEN, Appellant, v. Cathy Lynn (Haden) RIOU, Respondent. No. WD 60792. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 19, 2002. *539 Allen S. Russell, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Gabriel A. Domjan, Independence, MO, for Respondent. Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, P.J., PAUL M. SPIND
Haden v. Rioupublic domain
37 S.W.3d 854 (2001) Glen HADEN, Appellant, v. Cathy Lynn (Haden) RIOU, Respondent. No. WD 58199. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. February 20, 2001. *858 Allen S. Russell, Kansas City, for appellant. Gabriel A. Domjan, Independence, for respondent. Before SMART, P.J., ELLIS and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.</
David Lynn Jordan v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 3, 2016 Session DAVID LYNN JORDAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-11-159 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge No. W2015-00698-CCA-R3-PD - Filed October 14, 2016 _____________________________ The petitioner, David Lynn Jordan, appeals the
Union Trust Co. v. Welsh (In Re Welsh)public domain
138 B.R. 630 (1992) In re Robert Francis WELSH, Debtor. UNION TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Robert Francis WELSH, Defendant. John G. RUTH, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Robert Francis WELSH, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-9444-9P7, Adv. Nos. 91-727, 91-738. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. March 9, 1992. M. Lynn Pope, Tampa, Fla.,
Total E & P USA, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.public domain
Case: 11-30038 Document: 00512282396 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 20, 2013 No. 11-30038 Lyle W. Cayce
Total E & P USA, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.public domain
Case: 11-30038 Document: 00512171964 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 12, 2013 No. 11-30038 Lyle W. Cayce
Kim Cook v. Gary Chartrandpublic domain
JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: Florida public school teachers challenged Florida’s Student Success Act, as well as the Florida State Board of Education’s and three school districts’ implementation of the Act, alleging that the Act resulted in teacher evaluation policies that violated the teachers’ rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. Because we agr
Smith v. Lanierpublic domain
(2008) Leola SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Cathy LANIER, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0808 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Leola Smith filed this lawsuit against the District of Columbia, Police Chief Cathy Lanier,
Andreen v. Lanierpublic domain
(2008) Juliann ANDREEN, Plaintiff, v. Cathy LANIER, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0810 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 26, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Juliann Andreen filed this lawsuit against the District of Columbia, Police Chief Cathy Lanier, an
George v. Pricepublic domain
OPINION This suit arises out of a motor vehicle accident between a maintainer (or road grader) and a fire truck while both were involved in fighting a large grass fire. The trial court granted summary judgment for the maintainer's operator, Edward A. Price, who argued that he was immune from liability pursuant to TEX CIV. PRAC. REM. CODE ANN. § 79.003 (Vernon 2005). We affirm. I. Background Facts<
Eddings ex rel. Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.public domain
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: These four consolidated diversity actions present two issues involving Florida’s products liability statute of repose. The first issue concerns the effect of a decision by the Florida Supreme Court in which the court reversed a prior decision holding that the statute of repose was invalid as applied. We must decide whether application of the supreme court’s later decision in the cases before us depr
In Re Barnerpublic domain
239 B.R. 139 (1999) In re Scott Allen BARNER and Teena Ann Barner, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 97-34363(2)7. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. June 18, 1999. *140 Dennis E. Kurtz, Louisville, KY, for debtors. Cathy Pike, Louisville, KY, trustee. *141
Southern Federal Power Customers, Inc. v. Calderapublic domain
301 F.Supp.2d 26 (2004) SOUTHERN FEDERAL POWER CUSTOMERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Luis CALDERA, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Army, et al., Defendants. No. 00-2975 (TPJ). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 10, 2004. *27 David Acton Fitzgerald, Edward Joseph McGrath, Joan Cathy Fogel, Orlando E. Vid
Waffle House, Inc. v. Williamspublic domain
313 S.W.3d 796 (2010) WAFFLE HOUSE, INC., Petitioner, v. Cathie WILLIAMS, Respondent. No. 07-0205. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued March 12, 2009. Decided June 11, 2010. *798 W. Wendell Hall, Fullbright & Jaworski L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, Mark Thomas Emery, Fullbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Washington, DC, Ral
Hudson Street Equities Group v. Escoffierpublic domain
McCooe, J. (dissenting). This is the second proceeding be*65tween these parties regarding the subject apartment to come before this panel. The first proceeding was an illegal sublet where the issue was whether the tenant Escoffier contemporaneously resided at the subject apartment with the occupant. This primary residence proceeding raises essentially the same issue: whether