Cases

512 F.Supp.2d 975 (2007) John MURPHY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael Charles BUTLER, and Harris County, Texas, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-05-2883. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 19, 2007. *976 *977 *978 Stewart Edmond H

131 S.W.3d 170 (2004) CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Appellant, v. Keith A. BUTLER and Debbie K. Butler, Appellees. No. 04-02-00811-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 14, 2004. Rehearing Overruled February 25, 2004. *173 Nissa M. Sanders, Crofts & Callaway, P.C., Ricardo R. Reyna, Brock & Person, P

Zobel, J. I make the following findings by a preponderance of the credible evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. 1. Plaintiff James Clegg was injured in an automobile accident (“the accident”) May 4, 1991 at Woburn, Massachusetts. 2. Plaintiff is, and at all material times was, married to Catherine; he is the father of two minor children, Erin and Rachael.

Before BAUER, ESCHBACH, and FLAUM, Circuit Judges. ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants estate of Max G. Cole and Lois Pardue, Cole’s mother, (“plaintiffs”) appeal from entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Max Cole was a pretrial detainee confined to an acute care inpatient psychiatry unit at Wishard Memorial Psychiatry Ward in Indianapolis in July, 1991. Cole committed suicide by asph

01/08/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 25, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ADRIAN WAITE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County Nos. 303750, 303754 Tom Greenholtz, Judge No. E2019-02017-CCA-R3-CD

23 A.3d 601 (2011) UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (NICASTRO), Respondent. No. 1285 C.D. 2010 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs October 8, 2010. Decided March 17, 2011. Reargument Denied May 16, 2011. Publication Ordered June 21, 2011. Cecilia M. Muneses,

53 Cal.4th 170 (2011) 135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 247 266 P.3d 953 FRANCES HARRIS et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Real Parties in Interest. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; FRANCES HARRIS et al., Real Parties in Interest.<

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. ¶ 91. {concurring). I join the opinion and mandate of the court. I write separately to add that which needs be said: charging 300 percent interest for a short-term loan to those who *561can ill-afford it is ridiculous, unreasonable, and unconscionable. Wisconsin citizens deserve better. ¶ 92. Proponents of companies t

459 B.R. 298 (2011) In re EMERALD CASINO, INC., Debtor. Frances Gecker, not individually but solely as chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Emerald Casino, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Donald F. Flynn, Kevin F. Flynn, John P. McMahon, Joseph P. McQuaid, Kevin D. Larson, Walter P. Hanley and Peer Pedersen, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02 B 22977. Adversary No. 08 A 00972. United States Bankruptcy Cou

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 15 Docket: Wal-22-19 Argued: September 8, 2022 Decided: February 16, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J. JEFFREY R. MABEE et al. v. NORDIC AQUAFARMS INC. et al. CONNORS, J. [¶1] This is an appeal from a ju

*851OPINION OF THE COURT Michael V. Coccoma, J. The defendant John Wakefield is charged with murder in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.27 [1]), murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1] [a]), murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]), robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1]), and robbery in the first degree (Penal La

Filed 1/31/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A166863 v. (Mendocino County LAMONT ALEXANDER Super. Ct. Nos. DEAN, SCUKCRCR202036556-1, SCUKCRCR20203

OPINION By the Court, Pickering, C.J.: In this appeal we address psychosexual evaluations and consider whether a risk assessment based on clinical judgment, in addition to psychological tests, comports with Nevada law. Because NRS 176A.110 and NRS 176.139 call for the use of clinical judgment in tandem with diagnostic tools, we affirm. I. Appellant F

06/14/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 24, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BLAZE VALENTINO BURKETT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 16191 J. Russell Parkes, Judge No. M2019-02143-CCA-R3-CD The D

311 Ga. 26 FINAL COPY S20A1539. PEARSON v. THE STATE. NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. At his trial in September 2011, the jury found Appellant Gregory Pearson guilty of five counts of armed robbery, two counts of burglary, one count of aggravated assault, and six counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in connection with robberies in two motel rooms in Valdosta. In this appeal, he claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assista

[Cite as In re J.C., 2022-Ohio-850.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: J.C. : APPEAL NO. C-210318 TRIAL NO. 20-1906 : : O P I N I O N. Appeal From: Hamilton County Juvenile Court Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed D

OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification, Expedited Discovery, and Issuance of Notice (Doc. 6); Motion for Reconsideration of the Magis*887trate Judge’s Order denying granting Defendants’ motion to compel discovery (Doc.

ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Chevron Pipe Line Company, and Gulf Oil Corporation (collectively “Chevron”) move for a more definite statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) and also move to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims against them.1 Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation also moves for a more definite statem

MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, District Judge: Presently before the Court is a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 47) (hereinafter “Motion”) filed by Defendants Eli Lilly and Company and Michael Anderson. For the reasons discussed, the Motion will be denied. BACKGROUND I. Factual Background Plaintiff Catherine M. Aired (“Aired”) initiated the pr

372 F.Supp.2d 568 (2005) Catherine ZETA-JONES, an individual; CZ Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. THE SPICE HOUSE, a legal entity, form unknown; Wesglow Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 04-8743 CAS (RNBX). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. May 18, 2005.