Cases

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Krisber and Mario Castro (“Plaintiffs” or the “Castros”) commenced this action against Defendants Green Tree Servicing LLC (“Green Tree”) and Kevin Smith (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”), and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C.

In the Fourth Court Of Appeals Fourth Court Of Appeals District San Antonio Texas Bexar County Maryann Castro v. Manuel Castro Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14,00785-0/ Trial Court Case 201m To: The Justices of The Court Of Appeals

In the Fourth Court Of Appeals Fourth Court Of Appeals District San Antonio Texas Bexar County Maryann Castro v. Manuel Castro Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14-00785-CV Trial Court Case 2011 -CI-15957 To The Fourth Court of Justices In Appeals Court STATEMEN

In the Fourth Court Of Appeals Fourth Court Of Appeals District San Antonio Texas Bexar County Maryann Castro v. Manuel Castro Re: Court Of Appeals Number: 04-14:0078;5-CV Trial Court Case 2011 ^1-159575

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLACKBURN, District Judge. This matter is before me on the following: (1) the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [# 81]1 filed May 29, 2012; (2) the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 115] filed August 16, 2012; and (3) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [# 146] filed November 13,

Ditech Fin., LLC v Connors (2022 NY Slip Op 03709) Ditech Fin., LLC v Connors 2022 NY Slip Op 03709 Decided on June 8, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Patricia Damico and Lenna Lucas, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joshua and Brettany Buetow, Edward and Sylvia Dengg, Jonathan and Theresa Douglass, Anthony and Stacey Ray, Danny and Ellen Davis Morrow, Czara and Chad England, Bryan and Cynthia Camara, and Matthew Collins, Respondents, v. Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Spring Grove Plantation Development, Inc., Manale Landscaping, LLC, Super Concrete

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ April 23, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A19D0408. SAM L. LEVINE v. GEORGIA ALLOY, LLC et al. Georgia Alloy, LLC, and FDC 94, LLC (“the plaintiffs”), filed this action in superior court against Sam L. Levine, seeking a post-foreclosure writ of possession to certain real property. In June 2018, the su

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, and Alternatively, Motion for New Trial (Dkt. #89). After considering the relevant pleadings and the relevant trial testimony and evidence, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of la

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Omer Levy (“Levy” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against Receivables Performance Management, LLC (“RPM” or “defendant”) alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et. seq., and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et. seq.1

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Patricia Damico and Lenna Lucas, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joshua and Brettany Buetow, Edward and Sylvia Dengg, Jonathan and Theresa Douglass, Anthony and Stacey Ray, Danny and Ellen Davis Morrow, Czara and Chad England, Bryan and Cynthia Camara, and Matthew Collins, Respondents, v. Lennar Carolinas, LLC, Spring Grove Plantation Development, Inc., Manale Landscaping, LLC, Super Concrete of

OPINION Martha Hill Jamison, Justice Appellants Sarita Garg, Smith & Garg, LLC, and Garg & Associates, PC (the Garg Parties) challenge the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their motion to compel arbitration. . After the Garg Parties filed their notice of appeal, we ordered the parties to address whethér we have jurisdiction over this appeal

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of motions to compel arbitration. See Tex.Civ.Prao, & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.016 (West Supp.2015)(permitting an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitratio

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

GORDON J. QUIST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On April 12, 2017, Plaintiff, Karen Saunders, filed an action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) against Defendant, Dyck O'Neal, Inc. The facts arise out of Dyck O'Neal's efforts to collect a mortgage deficiency that Saunders alleges her ex-husband owes. From 2015 through 2017, Dyck O'Neal called repeatedly and left a number of voicemails on Saunders' phone. Dyck O'Neal u

MEMORANDUM & ORDER RAYMOND J. DEARIE, District Judge. Financial Recovery Services, Inc. (“FRS”), sent Edward Sutton a debt collection letter with . the heading “PAYMENTS ARE AN OPTION,” offering to accept $25 per month for three months to allow Sutton “more time to get [his] -finances in order.” Sutton opted instead to sue FRS, alleging that the letter violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FD

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: Armando Ybarra filed suit against DISH Network, L.L.C. for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. DISH called Ybarra’s cell phone 15 times to collect an unpaid balance. The district court entered partial summary judgment sustaining Ybarra’s claims regarding seven of the calls. Claims as to the other eight calls were later settled.

OPINION & ORDER Kenneth M. Karas, District Judge Helen Sue Kagan (“Plaintiff’) brings this Action, on behalf of herself and a class, alleging that Selene Finance L.P. (“Selene Finance”) and Selene Ventures GP, LLC (“Selene Ventures,” and collectively, “Defendants”) engaged in unlawful credit and collection practices in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. <

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge Plaintiff Frank Anthony ("Plaintiff"), pro se, brings this action against Defendant GE Capital Retail Bank, now known as Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony" or "Defendant"), alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq,<