Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “Castro v. 3M Company”
Castro v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc.public domain
OPINION ARLEO, District Judge Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Class Experts [Dkt. No 337] and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Dkt. No. 309]. The Court conducted a Daubert hearing from September 9th to September 11th, 2015. Considering the testimony and briefing, the Court is convinced that Plaintiffs’ ex*826
Bhatia v. 3M Co.public domain
DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge *1089INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Partial Motion to Dismiss and Strike Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") brought by Defendant 3M Company ("3M" or "Defendant") (Doc. No. 87). For the reasons set forth below, the Court gran
NUMBER 13-02-415-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
United States v. Marlowpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 10-0051-4 (PLF) ) ALONZO MARLOW, ) ) Defendant.
In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Prods. Liab. Litig.public domain
TRANSFER ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, Acting Chair Before the Panel:* There are two motions under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation. Defendants Tyco Fire Products, LP, and Chemguard, Inc. (collectively, Tyco) move to
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-24-00304-CV ________________ BEACH CLUB CONDOMINIUMS, A WINKLER DEVELOPMENT, L.P., WINKLER & ASSOCIATES, INC., WINKLER DEVELOPMENT, INC., AND JAMES WINKLER, Appellants v. SHO
Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.public domain
946 A.2d 1171 (2008) Deborah L. KEDY, Legal Representative for the Estate of Brian Scallion et al. v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al. In re Asbestos Litigation. Nos. 2005-332-M.P., 2005-319-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 9, 2008. *1175 Gerald Petros, Esq., Providence, for General Electric, petitioner. Robert J. Qui
Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commissionpublic domain
2022 WI 64 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP91 COMPLETE TITLE: Richard Teigen and Richard Thom, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, Defendant-Co-Appellant, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee,
Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commissionpublic domain
2022 WI 64 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP91 COMPLETE TITLE: Richard Teigen and Richard Thom, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, Defendant-Co-Appellant, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee,
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Inmanpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 864 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 865 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Kevin D. Wheeler, M.D. v. Charles F. Lubergerpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-14-00992-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/6/2015 5:33:21 PM
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. (d/b/a ConAgra Refrigerated Foods) (“ConAgra”) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma following a jury verdict, granting the claims of Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. (“Unitherm”) and of Jennie-0 Foods, Inc. (“Jennie-O”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) that ConAgra was liable for attempte
In re Remicade Antitrust Litig.public domain
Joyner, District Judge Before the Court are Defendants' Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc. (collectively "Janssen") ("J & J") Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 67-1), Indirect and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs' Joint Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 73), and Defendants' Reply in Support thereof (Doc. No. 75). I. Background
Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China National Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp.public domain
596 F.Supp.2d 842 (2008) ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHINA NATIONAL METALS & MINERALS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 05-4376 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 30, 2008. *845 David S. Stone, Robert A. Magnanini, Esqs. (Boies, Schiller & Fle
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
Tugwell v. Corte de Distrito de San Juanpublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Snyder emitió la opinión del tribunal. El Fondo Insular de Emergencia es una asignación continua y permanente “del saldo en efectivo del fondo gene*222ral . . . que excedan de los saldos de las asignaciones con-signadas en la Ley de Presupuesto . . .” al cerrarse las operaciones de cada año económico. Artículo 3, Ley núm.
In Re African-American Slave Descendants Litigationpublic domain
375 F.Supp.2d 721 (2005) In re AFRICAN-AMERICAN SLAVE DESCENDANTS LITIGATION. MDL No. 1491, No. 02 C 7764. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 6, 2005. *722 *723 *724 *725 Benjamin Obi Nwoye, Mend
in Re Thomas Wayne Florencepublic domain
IUJWcMAM&m; 14m Q&aw; §f, ^a^^^m ">•••;•••'. • ' •-.uKtifM;" 4JLL- i5~;oo*9<;-cr ,;-;,;.- .^^^^ '-,-7' • '..- I : - .' ***&?"«*« ,t : co^Utss' tock ian •CMw tiwft. tiNMEtfw&M;' Tft)fc QJM0J«r(LWO3 CJJZ^liJti. tito&MAlY-; CjQMfM/e t a