⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Castello v. City of New York”

Simon v. Castellopublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1997-03-27 · Published · cited 13× · 172 F.R.D. 103; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3768; 1997 WL 148243
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Michael Simon (“Simon”) and George Terry (“Terry”) filed an Amended Complaint alleging that Defendants Sal Cannavo (“Cannavo”), Ron Lacey (“Lacey”), and Robert Castello (“Castello”) defrauded Plaintiffs and made negligent misrepresentations in connection with a 1993 Asset Purchase and Consulting and Non-Competition' Agreements. Defendants C
People v. Castellopublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 7085
People v Castello (2019 NY Slip Op 07085) People v Castello 2019 NY Slip Op 07085 Decided on October 2, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 3129
Matter of Glyka Trans, LLC v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 03129) Matter of Glyka Trans, LLC v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 03129 Decided on May 2, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New Yor
Chery v. Castellopublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-08-02 · Published · cited 4× · 87 A.D.3d 520; 927 N.Y.2d 677
The plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse for her failure to oppose the motion of the defendant Ronnie Thornton for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her (see CFLR 5015 [a] [1]; Political Mktg., Int’l, Inc. v Jaliman, 67 AD3d 661 [2009]; cf. Felder v New York City Tr. Auth., 238 AD2d 543 [1997]; Krystofic v Rapisardi, 112 AD2d 196, 196-197 [1985]). The plaintiff also “established
Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985-11-22 · Published · cited 0× · 130 Misc. 2d 290; 496 N.Y.S.2d 637; 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3184
OPINION OF THE COURT Charles J. Thomas, J. The parties to this small claims action have consented to have the court treat this action as a motion for summary judgment based upon the following question: Is plaintiff entitled to recover a $200 deductible for no-fault personal injury excluded under Insurance Law § 5102 (b) (3) as first-party benefits? Plaintiff and defendant were involved
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998-03-09 · Published · cited 4× · 248 A.D.2d 441; 669 N.Y.S.2d 667; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2283
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated November 12, 1996, as granted the motion by the respondents City of New York and Board of Education of City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) an order of the same court, dated April 7, 1997, which denied the plaintiffs motion, in e
District Court, E.D. New York · 1969-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 303 F. Supp. 200; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10280
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge. The petitioner, now in Federal custody, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, presents an application to vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction entered against him on April 26, 1957 and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He and his co-defendants, Albert Henegan and Henry P. N. Caron, were found guilty after a jury trial on all three counts of an indictment charging them
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 233 A.D.2d 352; 650 N.Y.S.2d 588; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11721
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated March 21, 1995, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The record demonstrates,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970-06-01 · Published · cited 4× · 426 F.2d 905; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8972
POLLACK, District Judge: Michael Joseph Castello appeals from an order of the Eastern District which denies his petition to set aside his conviction in that Court on April 26, 1957 for conspiracy to rob a bank, aiding and abetting in the commission of the robbery and putting the life of the bank teller in danger, during its commission. The robbery was st
Robison v. Castellopublic domain
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971-09-07 · Published · cited 7× · 331 F. Supp. 667; 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 949; 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11749
331 F.Supp. 667 (1971) Melodie ROBISON, wife of/and Warren T. Robison, individually and on behalf of their minor children, John W. Robison and Tom T. Robison v. Thomas A. CASTELLO and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Civ. A. No. 71-211. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans Division. September 7, 1971. David Gertler, of Steven R. Plotk
District Court, E.D. New York · 1988-04-30 · Published · cited 2× · 686 F. Supp. 397; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6393; 1988 WL 67835
686 F.Supp. 397 (1988) MacPEG ROSS O'CONNELL and GOLDHABER, INC., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Paul R. CASTELLO, Mark R. Chandler, George Sokolowski, and Bonnie B. Stewart, Defendants. No. 86 CV 2817. United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 30, 1988. Ronald H. Alenstein, Shea & Gold, New York City, for plaintiff. Ronald P. Mysliwiec an
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959-04-20 · Published · cited 16× · 266 F.2d 49; 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4010
HINCKS, Circuit Judge. The only question presented by this appeal arises from the admission, at trial, of the confession of one Henegan, a co-defendant tried and convicted in the same trial as these appellants. There was evidence which tended to show that on March 22, 1955, a lone man armed with a gun partly concealed by an umbrella held up a teller at the Liberty Avenue Branch of
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998-10-15 · Published · cited 0× · 158 F.3d 387; 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1825; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 26023; 1998 WL 716911
OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. In this case, we must decide whether the district court was correct in affirming the arbitrator’s decision that Plaintiff-Appellant Sherwin-Williams’s sale of a wholly-owned subsidiary subjected it to withdrawal liability under section 4212(c) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., as amended by the Multiemploye
New York Supreme Court · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 21 Misc. 3d 226
OPINION OF THE COURT Michael D. Stallman, J. Defendant Board of Managers of the 225 East 57th Street Condominium moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a), to dismiss the complaint. Background This case involves a dispute between Thomas Campaniello, the owner of two commercial condominium units (units A and B) at 225 East 57th Street, New York, New York, and the condominium, c
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997-03-31 · Published · cited 1× · 969 F. Supp. 465; 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1307; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9344; 1997 WL 370870
*467MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER NUGENT, District Judge. • This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of a Magistrate Judge of this Court submitted on February 29, 1996 (Document #45). The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the decision of the Arbitrator is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff, Sherwin-Williams Co
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998-10-15 · Published · cited 12× · 158 F.3d 387
158 F.3d 387 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1825,Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23948DThe SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE PENSION AND RETIREMENTFUND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-3480. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued April 21, 1998.Decided Oct. 15, 1998.
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999-08-02 · Published · cited 31× · 57 F. Supp. 2d 1; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15949; 1999 WL 556472
57 F.Supp.2d 1 (1999) Joseph CARLINO, Jr., Joseph Carlino, Sr., Elizabeth Carlino, Kyle Rossell, Cheryl Rossell, Elwood Wrigley, Joanne Wrigley, Steven Burkhardt And Kathleen Burkhardt, Todd Evans, Robert Evans, And Mildred Evans, Plaintiffs, v. GLOUCESTER CITY HIGH SCHOOL, Dr. Ronald Pritchett, James Hetherington, Gloucestor City Board Of Education, Shirley Cleary, Susan Allgeier, Leroy Kramer, Barbara Stout, Stanley Booth, Chris Connelly, Board
California Court of Appeal · 1987-05-07 · Published · cited 37× · 191 Cal. App. 3d 976; 236 Cal. Rptr. 716; 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1698; 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 930
191 Cal.App.3d 976 (1987) 236 Cal. Rptr. 716 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. A024145. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five. May 7, 1987. *979 COUNSEL L
Edgar v. Castellopublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1880-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 14 S.C. 20; 1880 S.C. LEXIS 94
The opinion of the court was delivered by McIver, A. J. This was an action brought by a father to recover damages for an injury,'occasioned by the alleged negligence of the defendant, which caused the immediate death of the child of the plaintiff, an infant about three years of age. There is no allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff has sustained any .•damage by reason of the loss of the services of his chil
New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966-07-18 · Published · cited 7× · 417 P.2d 54; 76 N.M. 566
417 P.2d 54 (1966) 76 N.M. 566 Leon H. WATSON and Arva C. Watson, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico, Defendant-Appellee. No. 7774. Supreme Court of New Mexico. July 18, 1966. *55 Hines & Mistretta, Albuquerque, for appellants. Frank Horan, Threet, Threet, Glass