Cases

05/14/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 18, 2025 Session CASSANDRA (AVERITT) MCGUIRE v. BRIAN LEWIS Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Dickson County No. 08-03-096-M Craig S. Monsue, Judge ______________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 16, 2011 Session CASSANDRA LYNN RUDD v. HOWARD THOMAS RUDD Appeal from the Hardin County General Sessions Court No. 6677 Daniel L. Smith, Judge No. W2011-01007-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 22, 2011 This appeal c

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 28, 2009 Session CASSANDRA LYNN RUDD v. HOWARD THOMAS RUDD Direct Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Hardin County No. 6677 Daniel L. Smith, Judge No. W2009-00251-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 9, 2009 This is an appeal from a parenting plan entered by the trial court in a divo

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Robert Goguen is a former pretrial detainee at the Somerset County Jail (“SCJ”). He brought this action alleging that various correctional officers at SCJ violated his rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by inflicting punishment on him without due process of law and by retaliating against him for filing grievances against members of S

OPINION OF THE COURT WOLFE, Judge: Chief Warrant Officer Four (CW4) Elmer Hoffman, III, appeals his convictions of several sexual offenses involving four girls, three of whom were his children. A panel sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant of three specifications of rape of a child, one specification of abusive sexual contact, and three

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Cassandra Jackson and Willie Mason were convicted on two and three counts, respectively, of structuring currency transactions in violation of 31 U.S.C. §§ 5324(3) and 5322(a). The Supreme Court’s decision in Ratzlaf v. United States, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994), handed down well after the defendants’ trial, requires t

I. Introduction Cassandra Wilson ("Plaintiff") brought this putative class action on behalf of herself and similarly situated employees of Edison International, Inc. ("Edison"). The putative class consists of those Edison employees who, through their participation in the Edison 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Plan"), invested in the Edison International Stock Fund from March 27, 2014 through June 24, 2015 (the "Class Peri

28 So.3d 619 (2009) Judy WHITE, Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee. No. 2008-WC-01309-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. July 21, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 24, 2009. Certiorari Denied February 25, 2010. *620 Gilson Davis Peterson, attorney for appellant.

408 B.R. 394 (2008) In re Nathaniel E. NELSON, Sr. and Cassandra Ann Nelson, Debtors. In re Thomas Lee Guenther and Katrina Adele Ryan-Guenther, Debtors. In re Jeffrey Barrett Davis, Debtor. In re Sherry Lynn Allison, Debtor. Nos. 08-13756 HRT, 08-21472 HRT, 08-17931 HRT, 08-13629 HRT. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. December 23, 2008.

[Cite as Ebersole v. Toledo Hosp., 2025-Ohio-260.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Jaimee Ebersole Court of Appeals No. L-24-1045 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0202201367 v. The Toledo Hospital, et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee

Case: 21-1630 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 04/14/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CSI AVIATION, INC., Appellant v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Appellees ______________________ 2021-1630 ______________________

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Otis Henry’s objections ' [41] to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman’s Report and Recommendation (the “R & R”) [699], which recommends that Henry’s motions to suppress evidence from 1855 8th Street, Chamblee, Georgia [513 & 521] and to suppress identifications [509, 552 & 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2019 Term FILED April 29, 2019 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 18-0018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

730 F.Supp.2d 1308 (2009) GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, as subrogee of Britton Construction Ins., Plaintiff, v. WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION CO., Defendant. No. CIV 08-0828 JB/RHS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. June 10, 2009. *1310 Ada B. Priest, Madison Harbor & Moz, PA, Albuquerque, NM, Step

PER CURIAM: Adam Waldman, an Alabama prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the District Court’s dismissal of his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against five officials from the Alabama Department of Corrections (“ADOC”) on his claims that the Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act (“ASORCNA”) and the ADOC classif

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 73. {concurring in part and dissenting in part). This case involves the interpretation and application of a federal district court's Order dismissing a prior federal action. An appellate court typically interprets a judgment in the *569same manner that it interprets other written documents, including

PARKER, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the main opinion. I write specifically to address Parts I and II of that opinion. This Court has a duty to protect the Constitution and to uphold is provisions. “The right of the accused to a fair and impartial trial, or to a fair trial before an *162

BROWN, J. I respectfully dissent. Decades ago, this court misguidedly entered “into the business of crafting exceptions” to the certificate of probable cause requirement found in Penal Code section 1237.5. (People v. Lloyd (1998) 17 Cal.4th 658, 667 [72 Cal.Rptr.2d 224, 951 P.2d 1191] (dis. opn. of Brown, J.).) In doing so, this court ignored the broad lang

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0165p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ EUGENE BAKER; LESTER BAKER; PATRICIA BAKER; RAYMOND BAKER;

[Cite as Mundy v. Centrome, Inc., 2024-Ohio-1001.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY PAMELA DUFF MUNDY, ADM., et al., : Appellees, : CASE NO. CA2023-06-050 : OPINION - vs -