Cases

583 F.3d 586 (2009) Michael CASEY; Julie Pennington; Michael Crider; Kathleen Keller; Richard Keller; Richard Piatchek; Heidi Piatchek, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, Defendant, North American Savings Bank; Heartland Bank; ABM AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-1096. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 16-P-32 Appeals Court LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANC

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Casey (2022 NY Slip Op 02450) U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v Casey 2022 NY Slip Op 02450 Decided on April 13, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

2 F.Supp.2d 1458 (1997) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Plaintiff, v. BELLATRIX, Official No. 696747, her engines, machinery, equipment and appurtenances, In Rem; et al., Defendants. No. C-97-1069 WHO. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 8, 1997. Genese Dopson Smith, Casey L. Merrill, Smith & Wong, Kentfield, CA, for Plaintiffs. OPINION

JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge. hln this domestic case, Appellant, Francis X. Casey III, seeks review of the district court’s rulings permitting the withdrawal of his attorney over his objection and adopting the “Recommendations of Special Master on Rule to Reduce Child Support Filed by Francis Casey, III and Rule to Determine Credits and Rule to Determine Child Support from April 1, 2013 filed by Deborah Kraft Casey” as the fin

PITTMAN, Judge. Sean G. Casey (“the former husband”) appeals from an order of the Escambia Circuit Court1 denying the former husband’s Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion seeking relief from a default judgment that had been entered against him and in favor of Jonice D. Casey (“the former wife”) in postdivorce proceedings. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the case with instructions

CASEY vs. PAPAMECHAIL, MISC 18-000620 CARLA CASEY, Plaintiff, v. PAMELA PAPAMECHAIL; MARYLOU SUDDERS, SECRETARY OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; and OFFICE OF MEDICAID/MASSHEALTH THIRD PARTY RECOVERY UNIT, Defendants MISC 18-000620 JUNE 1, 2021 ESSEX, ss. PIPER, J. DECISION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1743, 22-1744, 22-1745, 22-1746, 22-1747, 22-1748, 22- 1749, 22-1750, 22-1751, 22-1752, 22-1753, 22-1754, 22-1755, 22- 1756, 22-1757, & 22-1758 RICHARD MAZUREK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. METALCRAFT OF MAYVILLE, INC.,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1743, 22-1744, 22-1745, 22-1746, 22-1747, 22-1748, 22- 1749, 22-1750, 22-1751, 22-1752, 22-1753, 22-1754, 22-1755, 22- 1756, 22-1757, & 22-1758 RICHARD MAZUREK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. METALCRAFT OF MAYVILLE, INC.,

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The outcome of this federal bankruptcy ease turns on interpretations of two different state statutes, each of which concerns defects in real estate titles. In time, those interpretations may affect considerable numbers of Massachusetts foreclosure proceedings. In this case, those interpretations affect who will benefit from the estate’s real property asse

2022 IL App (3d) 210404 Opinion filed September 15, 2022 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2022 AUSTIN CASEY III,

[Dkt. # # 21, 26, 29, 34, 37, 43, 44, 47, 55, 59, 60, 64, 82] MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Paul and Abigail Casey (“plaintiffs”) 1 brought this action against defendants

Opinion issued July 27, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ——————————— NO. 01-22-00247-CV ——————————— BETTY RATHBUN LIGON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee V. JUDITH D. CASEY, A

384 F.Supp.2d 845 (2005) In re MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION. (In re Janus SUBTRACK). No. MDL-1586. Civ. No. 04-MD-15863. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 25, 2005. *846 *847 *848 *849 Christopher S. Hi

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. Defendant Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company (Acceptance) seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Great West Casualty Company (Great West). 1 Both Acceptance and Great West issued liability insurance policie

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 386 Richard W. Casey appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Baldwin Circuit Court in favor of J. Vincent McConnell on Casey's claims against McConnell (case no. 2060324) and from a subsequent postjudgment order reserving jurisdiction as to McConnell's counterclaim seeking attorney fees and costs from Cas

OPINION GARY R. WADE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. The minor beneficiary of a $100,000 life insurance policy filed suit against his financial guardian and the insurance company after the gua

OPINION ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge. Class representatives Christopher and Mystic Burnette appeal three rulings by the district court that resulted in judgment for defendant real estate firms, all of which operate in Kentucky. The fourth amended complaint alleged that defendants violated Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, by particip

PER CURIAM: This case is before this Court upon appeal of a final order of the Circuit Court of Kana-wha County entered on December 18, 1998. In that order, the circuit court entered summary judgment in favor of the appellee and defendant below, Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, in an action filed by the appellant and plaintiff below, the Estate of Huida Davis by its Executrix, Jerold A. Casey, alleging breach of contract, fra

688 F.Supp.2d 1086 (2010) MayeVern CASEY, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., Defendant. Case No. CV F 08-1811 LJO DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. February 24, 2010. *1089 Kathleen Rivera, William L. Alexander, Alexander & Associates, PLC, Bakersfield, CA, for Plaintiff. Rebecca A. Hull, Miche