Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0480 Filed November 4, 2020 JOSHUA BOLKEMA and NATALIE BOLKEMA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, vs. CASEY SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Stuart Werling, Judge. The defendant appeals the district court’s rulings on the plaintiffs’ petition for

CANE, J. ¶ 1. This case involves an insurance coverage dispute arising out of a multi-vehicle accident that took place on February 27, 2009. One of the vehicles involved was a semi-tractor owned and operated by John Zeverino, but leased to Taylor Truck Line, Inc. Taylor had a commercial automobile policy through Great West Casualty Company, and Zeverino had a non-trucking use automobile policy through Acceptance Casualty Insuranc

Per Curiam: Casey Smith was convicted in a jury trial of aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer for driving his truck at Officer Blake Larsen. He raises three issues in his direct appeal: (1) Whether the State introduced sufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) whether the district court erred in failing to sua sponte give a unanimity jury instruction; and (3) whether the district court violated his constitutiona

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. Defendant Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company (Acceptance) seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Great West Casualty Company (Great West). 1 Both Acceptance and Great West issued liability insurance policie

Murray, P.J. This is an inheritance dispute between the natural children of Everett and Mary Alice Casey, Kathryn and Kirk Casey, and Renee and Bruce Keene, who claim to be the offspring of Everett and their mother’s (Corinne Keene) adulterous affair in the 1960s. Everett and Corinne were both married during their alleged affair. In these consolidated appeals, appellants, Renee and Bruce Keene, appeal as of right the order granti

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Casey Peebles of two offenses for his participation in a drug trafficking conspiracy. Peebles appeals the district court's 1 denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal as well as a number of evidentiary rulings. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: At issue in this appeal is whether the author of a musical composition who assigned his rights in exchange for royalties may rely for purposes of standing to sue for infringement under the Copyright Act on a registration his publisher filed. Ronald Louis Smith, Jr., as representative for the estate of his

968 A.2d 1064 (2009) MILLER AND SMITH v. CASEY. Pet. Docket No. 616. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Granted April 7, 2009. Petition for writ of certiorari granted.

By Judge Aundria d. Foster This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs Motion in Limine in which the plaintiff requests that the Court bar defendant from mentioning Virginia’s Three Percent Rule, under Va. Code § 46.2-1517. In this case, the parties dispute what the term “damages” means as applied in the Three Percent Rule. Plaintiff contends that the Three Percent Rule only applies to (1) transit damage from the m

PER CURIAM: * Vincent John Bazemore, Jr., federal prisoner #37160-177, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal of the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens1 action as duplicative, presumably pursuant either to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) or to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). Bazemore’s motion is construed as a challenge to the dist

699 S.E.2d 87 (2010) VINCENT et al. v. CASEY et al. No. A10A0660. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 8, 2010. Louis Levenson, Atlanta, Dylan Littlejohn, for appellants. William M. Akin, for appellees. ADAMS, Judge. Appellants Benjamin Hill Vincent, Individually, and the estate of Benjamin Hill Vincent, formerly an incapacitated adult, brought sui

Opinion issued January 29, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00954-CV ——————————— WANDA JOYCE SMITH, Appellant V. CASEY LENDING, LLC AND TAI PHAN,

987 A.2d 1 (2010) 412 Md. 230 MILLER AND SMITH AT QUERCUS, LLC, et al. v. CASEY PMN, LLC. No. 29 September Term 2009. Court of Appeals of Maryland. January 11, 2010. Paul T. Glasgow (Samantha M. Williams and Kristin M. Koger of Venable LLP of Rockville), on brief, for petitioners. *2 Paul A. Kaplan

MEMORANDUM — DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On May 17, 2012, plaintiffs Gordon Casey (“Casey”) and Duane Skinner (“Skinner”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed this class action lawsuit against defendants Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”); CitiMortgage, Inc. (“CitiMortgage”);

71 P.3d 351 (2003) 205 Ariz. 359 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Fletcher CASEY, Appellant. No. CR-01-0223-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona. June 25, 2003. *352 Janet A. Napolitano, Attorney General, by Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, and Doriane F. Zwillinger, Assistant Attorney Gener

OPINION By the Court, Pickering, J.: Nevada has adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act of 2000, codified in NRS 38.206 to 38.248 (UAA). See NRS 38.206; 2001 Nev. Stat., ch. 280, §§ 1-44, at 1274-87. The UAA provides for judicial review and enforcement of arbitration awards. It provides that the winning party can move the district court for an order confirming the award, NRS 38.239, a

838 N.E.2d 114 (2005) 361 Ill. App.3d 658 297 Ill.Dec. 627 Oralanda DAVIS, as Mother and Next Friend of Mitchell Thomas, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Laura CASEY, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Ramon Nightengale, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee (Willie Taylor and Chicago Housing Authority, Defendants). No. 1-03-2194.

OPINION CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, P.J., and D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., joined. Alan Howard Peters was seriously injured when his vehicle collided with logs that had rolled off a truck. He and his wife filed this personal injury action and

Per Curiam: Deshawn Dupree Smith appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of attempted first-degree robbery (§§ 564.011 and 569.020), first-degree robbery (§ 569.020), and armed criminal action (§ 571.015), for which he was sentenced as a persistent felony offender to concurrent terms of ten, twenty, and ten years' imprisonment, respectively. Smith brings two points on appeal. Finding no error of law, we affirm. Rule 30.25(

¶59 (dissenting) — During William Glen Smith’s trial, the judge and attorneys left the courtroom and gathered in a nearby hallway to hold private meetings on 12 occasions.22 The attorneys made motions to exclude testimony and argued over the extent of questioning allowed with certain witnesses, and the judge made rulings regarding the admissibility of evidence and testimony. Those rulings helped shape the course of the trial, y