Cases

Lee, J. ¶ 1 Margie Lockner appeals the superior court’s summary judgment dismissal of her claims based on the recreational immunity statute, RCW 4.24.210. Lockner argues that the superior court improperly applied the recreational immunity statute because (1) she provided evidence that the place of her injury was used for transportation purposes and (2) she brought a negligence clai

MADSEN, J. (concurring) ¶ 25 I agree with the majority that the plain language of RCW 4.24.210 provides recreational use immunity to Pierce County and note that the majority's application here comports substantially with the dissent's analysis in Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co. , 179 Wash.2d 684

725 N.W.2d 691 (2006) 272 Mich. App. 394 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warren J. PIERCE, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 261805. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted October 5, 2006, at Lansing. Decided October 10, 2006, at 9:10 a.m. Released for Publication January 5, 2007.

Hanlon, J. The primary issue before us is whether, on the facts of this case, the husband’s military retirement pay should have been treated as a marital asset subject to division. The wife appeals from a February, 2009, judgment of divorce, arguing that the judge erred in treating the husband’s military pension as income, and that the judge’s findings of fact related to property division and child support were not supported by

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NELVA GONZALEZ RAMOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this prisoner civil rights action, Plaintiff William Casey challenges certain policies and practices of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division (TDCJ-CID) that he claims conflict with his right to practice his Native American faith in violation of the

06/21/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 17, 2019 Session CATHRYN HELRIGEL PIERCE v. SHERMAN LANE PIERCE Appeal from the General Sessions (Domestic Relations) Court for Meigs County No. D-1660 Casey Mark Stokes, Judge __

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the court is petitioner Michael Rodriguez’s (“petitioner”) amended application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (D.l. 8; D.l. 9) Petitioner is incarcerated at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Institution in Smyrna, Delaware. For the reasons that follow, the court will dismiss his appli

JOHN L. KANE, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE On the night of February 14, 2014, Plaintiff Patti French called 911 to obtain *1020a mental health hold for her son, Plaintiff Shane French. Officers from the Cortez Police Department arrived at the French home in short order. Hearing voices inside, they entered the residence, tackled Shane, and tase

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 19-1684 _____________ CASEY DOOLEY, Appellant v. JOHN WETZEL; KEVEN KAUFMAN; RICHARD A. GOSS On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pe

This opinion was filed for/ecord /FTCEV X IN CLERKS OPFICE X ■UnSE COURT. amiE CF WMH^QTON Susan L. Carlson JAW 0 9 212^ Supreme Court Clerk " GmBFJusnce / IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-KA-01516-SCT CASEY MARK BURGESS a/k/a CASEY BURGESS a/k/a CASEY M. BURGESS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/11/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN HUEY EMFINGER TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DONALD W. BOYKIN JACQUELINE L. PURNELL MICHAEL G

CONERY, Judge. | Nellie Marceaux Pierce (“Mrs. Pierce”), Russie Tiller Pierce and David Pierce, collectively the “Pierce Children”, and Pierce Enterprises, Inc. (“Pierce Enterprises”), collectively the “Pierce Plaintiffs,” appeal the trial court’s May 2, 2013 judgment granting United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“USF & G”), Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (“Hartford”), Great American Insurance Company

384 B.R. 477 (2008) In re Leon Carol PIERCE, Barbara Ann Pierce, Debtors. No. 05-73327. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 28, 2008. *478 Patrick H. O'Brien, Pomeroy, OH, for Debtors. Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co., Larry J. McClatchey, Columbus, OH, for trustee.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5504-12T1 CASEY PIATT, BRUCE DAVIS, TAMMY DAVIS, MICHAEL CORTES, JOHN R. FALZONE, MADELINE McKENZIE, TERRY BOWEN, FRED SIENA, BRUCE VANMETER, KEVIN CARTER, MARK APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION MEZIS, STEV

APPEALS COURT MICHAEL D. CAVANAGH vs. LYNN A. CAVANAGH Docket: 23-P-1461 Dates: December 2, 2024 – July 9, 2025 Present:

509 F.3d 1278 (2007) Edward CASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF FEDERAL HEIGHTS, Les Acker, Kevin Sweet, and Malee Lor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-1426. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 10, 2007. *1279 Michael J. Thomson, Purvis, Gray & Murphy, LLP, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Thomas S. Rice (G

LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. The Chancery Court of Itawamba County found that certain property once owned by Gocher and Reba Morrow (the Morrows) vested in their estates at the time of their deaths and passed by intestate succession in equal shares to their three sons, Phillip, Ronald, and Joel. Phillip appealed, arguing that he held a remainder interest and the property vested in him at his parents’ d

LASKER, District Judge. Douglas J. Michelson, who appears pro se, is suing a number of individual investors, commodities traders, investment companies, commodities brokers, and two commodity exchanges on various federal and state causes of action for losses he suffered in January 1980 when his metal futures account was liquidated by his broker, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN;  PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity, No. 09-15703 JOSEPH ARPAIO, Sheriff, and AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife; DENNIS  D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997- WILENCHIK and BECKY BARTNESS, SRB husband and wife; JOHN DOES I-X; JA

OPINION OF THE COURT Max Bloom, J. Plaintiff moves pursuant to CPLR 902 for an order permit*942ting maintenance of this suit as a class action. The complaint alleges that the defendant, a stockbroker, violated and continues to violate a fiduciary duty owed to its customers by withholding funds due them for a period of 24 hours or more, thus permitt