Cases

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of February 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of February 2019."

*430The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of March 2019 by Defendant to Dismiss Appeal:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of February 2019 by State of NC for Temporary Stay: "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019." Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of February 2019 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Caroli

23 P.3d 958 (2000) 2001 OK CIV APP 29 Leonard LAPKIN, M.D., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Judgment Assignor, Raphael Nevin Pino, incapacitated adult, by and through his Guardian, Darla Lynn Pino; Darla Lynn Pino, individually, and Angel-Lena Pino, a minor, by and through her Natural Guardian and Next Friend, Darla Lynn Pino, Plaintiffs/Judgment Assignees/Appellees, v. GARLAND BLOODWORTH, INC., d/b/a Bloodworth &

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ : GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 22-0112 (ABJ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DONALD LYNN MARTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-1594 (TSC) ) MERRICK GARLAND, et al., )

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1780 LILIAN EUGENIA VARELA-CHAVARRIA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Kayatta, Howard, and Rikelm

Case: 19-60760 Document: 00516084747 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/08/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 8, 2021

06/13/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2022 CASEY COLBERT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 09-07785 James M. Lammey, Judge ___________________________________

21-1338-cv Lawyers’ Committee v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2021 ARGUED: JANUARY 21, 2022 DECIDED: AUGUST 5, 2022 No. 21-1338-cv Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc., Richard Gage, Christopher Gioia, Diana

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1687 JOSE NOLBERTO TACURI-TACURI, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Thompson and Kayatta,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 11, 2020 Decided June 18, 2021 No. 20-5106 M.M.V., ET AL., APPELLANTS v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLEES Consolidated with 20-5129 Appeals from the United States District Cou

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00800-COA ALAINA HILL ROGERS APPELLANT v. CASEY AND CO. LLC APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/14/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN ANDREW GREGORY COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CHICKASAW COUNTY CIRCUIT CO

In State ex rel. Sokira v. Burr, 580 So.2d 1340, 1344-45 (Ala. 1991), the Alabama Supreme Court reaffirmed its holding in Hogan v. Hartwell,242 Ala. 646, 7 So.2d 889 (1942), overruled, Mason v. State, 267 Ala. 507,103 So.2d 341 (1958), and specifically adopt

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority opinion for several reasons. First, the opinion relies on State ex rel. Sokira v.Burr, 580 So.2d 1340 (Ala. 1991), which in turn relies on the United States Supreme Court cases of United States v. Wilson,32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 150, 160 (1833), in which Chief Justice Marshall wrote "[a] pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from the power entrusted w

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge Hostility. It's a term of art under Arkansas's adverse-possession law and is front and center in this appeal, which primarily asks: Can Garland Gilmore and Lesha Prater prevail on their adverse-possession claim against Sean and Kim Collier if Garland Gilmore believed he owned the disputed tract of land for some forty years, has possessed and farmed the disputed area for the same length of time, but was ini

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; Nos. 19-16487 AL OTRO LADO; INNOVATION LAW 19-16773 LAB; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:19-cv-04073- JST v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER AND General; UNITED STATES AME

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by e-mail at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 16, 2024 Decided December 6, 2024 No. 24-1113 TIKTOK INC. AND BYTEDANCE LTD., PETITIONERS v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, RESPONDENT Consolidated with 24-1130, 24-1183 On Petitions for Revi