Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Casey Dean Thompson”
Casey v. Clarkepublic domain
James Casey and Stephen Earl Murphree sued Marshall S. Clarke, Dana Joy Clarke, Merchants Bank, and Compass Bank to quiet title to a strip of land approximately 19 feet wide (disputed strip), which bordered Interstate 65. See Appendix "A". James and Murphree also asserted a claim of trespass and an easement by implication, and they requested reformation of their deed to correct the section number. Marshall and Dana answered and counterclaimed for trespass. Following oral procee
Casey Barclay v. Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 21, 2009 Session CASEY BARCLAY, as Next of Kin of ODIS DOYLE BARCLAY, JR., deceased, and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of ODIS DOYLE BARCLAY, JR. v. KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-001730-07
Food Lion, LLC v. Dean Foods Companypublic domain
OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Dean Foods Company and Suiza Foods Corporation were the two largest processed milk bottlers in the country in 2001. At that time, they announced plans to merge their operations, which the Department of Justice approved subject to divestment of particular milk processing plants. The merged company, now known
Thompson v. Campbellpublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Harold Thompson is a Tennessee prison inmate, a self-proclaimed anarchist, and an inventive litigant. In December 2000, he sued several Tennessee prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging the validity of several prisoner-mail policies adopted by the State of Tennessee, including most notably the State’s policy of withholding incoming mail from “anarchist” organizations. Thompson claims that
People v. Martinpublic domain
721 N.W.2d 815 (2006) 271 Mich. App. 280 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Dean MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger D. Thompson, Defendant-Appellant. People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger W. Brown, Defendant-Appellant. People of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy Ra
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge. This Memorandum and Order addresses the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 19, filed by Defendant GEEK Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P. (“Geek Squad”); Plaintiffs Charles Casey and Jeanette Casey’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pis.’ S.J. Resp.”), ECF No. 21; and Defendant’s Reply to Pl
Casey v. Newport School Committee, 97-130 (1999)public domain
DECISION This matter comes before the court on defendants' motion for summary judgment. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 56 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants have outlined three issues as pertinent to their motion: (1) failure to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress absent proof of resultant physical ailments; (2) failure to state a claim for malicious
Hohe v. Caseypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Circuit Judge. Class action plaintiffs, nonunion employees, appeal the order of the district court to *402the extent it grants final judgment in favor of various officials of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (the “Commonwealth”), and Council 13 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, (“Counc
Casey v. Lewispublic domain
834 F.Supp. 1477 (1993) Fletcher CASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV 90-0054 PHX CAM, CIV 91-1808 PHX CAM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 19, 1993. *1478 *1479 Alice Loeb Bendheim, Phoenix, AZ, Adjoa A. Aiyetoro, Stuart Henry Adams, Jr.,
Kevorkian v. Thompsonpublic domain
947 F.Supp. 1152 (1997) Jack KEVORKIAN and Janet Good, Plaintiffs, v. Richard THOMPSON, Prosecuting Attorney for the County of Oakland, Michigan, Defendant. No. 96-CV-73777-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. January 6, 1997. *1153 *1154 Geoffrey N. Fieger, Sout
Dean v. District of Columbiapublic domain
*309FERREN, Associate Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Plaintiff-appellants, two homosexual men, want to marry each other. They appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment for the District of Columbia, rejecting their complaint for an injunction to require the
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–0603 Submitted November 14, 2024—Filed May 23, 2025 Nedzad Mehmedovic as the administrator of the Estate of Hus Hari Buljic and as the administrator of the Estate of Sedika Buljic; Honario Garcia, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Reberiano Leno Garcia; and Arturo de Jesus Hernandez and Miguel Angel Hernandez as coadministrators of the Estate of Jos
Arbaugh v. Board of Educationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER KEELEY, District Judge. Before the Court -are a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Calvin Thompson, and a motion for leave to amend the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Tony Arbaugh. The motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court first GRANTS Arbaugh leave to amend his complaint because the amendment is not prejudicial, in bad faith, o
Casey v. Williamspublic domain
482 P.2d 824 (1971) John Jay CASEY, Individually, and Holland Livestock Ranch, a co-partnership composed of Bright-Holland Company, Nemeroff-Holland Company, and Maremont-Holland Company, Appellants, v. James A. WILLIAMS and Ellen C. Williams, Respondents. No. 6263. Supreme Court of Nevada. March 26, 1971. Vargas, Bartlett & Dixon, and Frederic R. Starich, Reno,
London v. Londonpublic domain
349 S.W.3d 672 (2011) Jeffrey LONDON, Appellant, v. Leticia LONDON, Appellee. No. 14-10-00385-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). July 26, 2011. *673 Scott Rothenberg, Houston, for appellant. Shawn Russel Casey, R. Dean Irwin, Houston, for appellee. Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justice
Cutts v. Caseypublic domain
180 S.E.2d 297 (1971) 278 N.C. 390 C. H. CUTTS v. S. Worth (Wirt) CASEY and wife, Martha B. Casey. No. 40. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 14, 1971. *299 Blake & Trawick, Burgaw, Rountree & Clark, Wilmington, for plaintiff appellee. Corbett & Fisler, Burgaw, for defendant appellan
Atlantic Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Butlerpublic domain
137 S.W.3d 199 (2004) ATLANTIC LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY of Texas, Centennial Insurance Company, Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, Barry Brady, and Thomas Gervasio, Appellants, v. Sue BUTLER, Sheila Cauley, Brad Godwin, Gayle Godwin, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Paul Godwin, Deceased, Delores Hardy, Marilyn Savage Martinez, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen Janice Savage, Deceased, Thomas J. May, De
Orion Refining Corp. v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.public domain
319 B.R. 480 (2004) ORION REFINING CORP., et al. v. FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., et al. Civ.A. No. 04-570. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. June 17, 2004. *481 Dean Rauchwerger, Martin C. Sener, Kenneth R. Wysocki, Michael S. Errera, Clausen Miller, PC, Chicago, IL, Russ M. Herman, Sidney A. Cotlar, Leonard A. Davis, Ste
Pratt v. Andersonpublic domain
THOMAS, Judge. Keiteria Anderson (“the mother”) petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson Circuit Court to set aside its September 16, 2014, “pendente lite” order, which awarded pendente lite custody of her children to Gregory Michael Pratt (“the father”). After reviewing the petition, the materials submitted in support of the petition, and the father’s answer, we grant the petition and issue the re
SNEED, Circuit Judge: Joor Manufacturing (Joor) successfully sought to have the Western Fire Chiefs Association (WFCA) amend its influential model fire code in a manner disadvantageous to Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. (Sessions), a competitor. Sessions sued Joor for violating the Sherman Act. The district court granted the defendant summary judgment, ruling that the Noerr