Cases

MEMORANDUM Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court for determination is the Trustee’s Motion for Turnover of Receivable Proceeds (the “Turnover Motion”). Through the Turnover Motion, Debora Casey, Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”) of the bankruptcy estate of the Debtor, Edward J. Sylvia, Jr. (“Sylvia” or the “Debtor”), seeks an order directing

Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The adversary proceeding pending before this Court was filed due to an unscrupulous attorney's theft of $2.4 million. This attorney has no moral compass whatsoever, and his perfidy has resulted in litigation among his former clients, friends, and various third parties who did not have the displeasure of knowing him. While he deservedly spen

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1080 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT GREATER BALTIMORE CENTER FOR  PREGNANCY CONCERNS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, and ST. BRIGID’S ROMAN CATHOLIC CONGREGATION INCORPORATED; ARCHBISHOP EDWIN F. O’BRIEN, ARCHBISHOP OF BALTIMORE AND HIS SUCCESSORS IN OFFICE, A CORPORATION SOLE,  No. 11-1111 Plaintiffs,

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1111 GREATER BALTIMORE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY CONCERNS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff – Appellee, and ST. BRIGID’S ROMAN CATHOLIC CONGREGATION INCORPORATED; ARCHBISHOP WILLIAM E. LORI, as successor to Archbishop Edwin F. O’Brien, Archbishop of Baltimore, and his successor in office, a

258 B.R. 554 (2001) In re Myron W. SISKIN, Debtor. Myron W. Siskin and Miriam Siskin, Plaintiffs, v. Complete Aircraft Services, Inc., Harry K. Kutner, Jr., Esq., Sylvia Ross and Marvin A. Bass, Esq., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 898-82271-478. Adversary No. 898-8393-478. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. February 13, 2001.

Adams v. A.J. Ballard Jr. Tire & Oil Co., 2006 NCBC 9 Adams v. BP Prods. N. Am., Inc., 2006 NCBC 9 Barnett v. BP Prods. N. Am., Inc., 2006 NCBC 9 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION CARTERET COUNTY 01 CVS 1271 BOBBIE ADAMS, TINA ADAMS, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of CODY AD

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 255–381 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

509 So.2d 292 (1987) In re ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR, Request of May 12, 1987. No. 70533. Supreme Court of Florida. July 14, 1987. *295 Charles R. Ranson of Ranson & Wiggins, Tallahassee, and Gregory L. Diskant of Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City, for Association of Nat. Advertisers, Inc., American Ass'n of

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiffs James Jones, Nicole Steels, Kavon Ward, and Iona Toles have filed this suit on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated employees of the National Council of Young Men’s Christian Associations of the United States of America (the ‘Y”), alleging claims of race discrimination and retaliation against the Y and

ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST

N0. 01-14-01004-CV IN THE FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST COURT OF APPEAL HOUSTON, TEXAS AT HOUSTON 10/22/2015 4:44:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE ___________________________ Clerk Kevin CAMPBELL,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. 1. Introduction This memorandum and order addresses plaintiffs’ application for class certification. See Third Amended Class Action Complaint and Supplemental Memorandum in Support Amended and Renewed Motion for Class Certification, dated July 26, 2002. Extensive briefing and argument by the parties on the issue have been con