Cases

Case below, 539 Fed.Appx. 803.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

521 F.3d 1242 (2008) Mercedez CARVAJAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, substituted as Defendant in place and instead of individual Federal Defendants, Brett Kelly, Steven Norkus, HI, David Sikorra and Luke Yoo, Defendant-Appellee, and City of Los Angeles; Jason Spizouco; Gerard Kennelly; Ed Gutierrez; Brian Agnew; John Guerrero; Ruben Galvian; Mike Damianikes; Joe Prebe; Armando Sandoval; William J. Bratton, Defendants.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MERCEDEZ CARVAJAL,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, substituted as Defendant in place and instead of individual Federal Defendants, Brett Kelly, Steven Norkus, III, David Sikorra and No. 06-55868 Luke Yoo, Defendant-Appellee,  D.C. No. CV-05-071

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1207 UNITED STATES, Appellee, V. BERNARDITO CARVAJAL, a/k/a Christian Mendez-Acevedo, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2934 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERNANDO ALVAREZ-CARVAJAL, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Carvajal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Carvajal has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the re

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. I. FACTS.................................................................225 A. Procedural History..................................................225 B. The Drug Trafficking Organization and Planned November 2006 Loads.........................................

PER CURIAM: Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Angel Olaya-Carvajal in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Olaya-

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

05-1284-cr United States v. Carvajal 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 7 August Term, 2006 8 9 (Argued: July 12, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007) 10 11 Docket Nos. 05-1284-cr(L); 05-1514-cr(XAP)* 12 13 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , 15 1

PER CURIAM: Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Angel Olaya-Carvajal in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Olaya-

MEMORANDUM ** Luis Carvajal appeals from his 120-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Carvajal contends that, now that the United States Sentencing Guide

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Gonzalez-Carvajal appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed by the district court following his jury-trial conviction for attempted re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We *658have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Contrary to Gonzalez-Carvajal’s contention, his p

MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Guillermo Carvajal-Osorio appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm and remand. Carvajal-Osorio’s contention regarding the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, <