⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carter v. Hallum”

State v. Hallumpublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998-10-21 · Published · cited 68× · 585 N.W.2d 249; 1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 238; 1998 WL 733919
585 N.W.2d 249 (1998) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Matthew HALLUM, Appellant. No. 97-370. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 21, 1998. *252 Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and John P. Messina, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Julie H. Brown, Assistant Attorney Gen
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003-01-27 · Published · cited 15× · 576 S.E.2d 849; 276 Ga. 147; 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 287; 2003 Ga. LEXIS 66
576 S.E.2d 849 (2003) 276 Ga. 147 PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY v. HALLUM. No. S02Q1307. Supreme Court of Georgia. January 27, 2003. *850 Carter & Ansley, Atlanta, H. Sanders Carter Jr., Andrea K. Cataland, for appellant. Goldner, Sommers, Scrudder & Bass, Glenn Scott Bass, R
District Court, D. Maine · 1993-12-29 · Published · cited 14× · 162 B.R. 51; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18486; 1993 WL 544254
162 B.R. 51 (1993) Marilynn REYNOLDS-MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Kenneth R. HALLUM, Appellee. Civ. No. 92-378-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 29, 1993. *52 Marilynn R. Reynolds-Marshall, pro se. Jed Davis, Jim Mitchell & Jed Davis, P.A., Augusta, ME, for appellee. Pasquale J. Perrino, Jr., Augu
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002-05-02 · Published · cited 3× · 289 F.3d 1350; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8358; 2002 WL 832420
PER CURIAM: CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE VI, SECTION VI, PARAGRAPH IV, OF THE GEORGIA CONSTITUTION. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA AND ITS HONORABLE JUSTICES. It appears to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that this case invo
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001-08-10 · Published · cited 1× · 257 F. Supp. 2d 1373; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25158
257 F.Supp.2d 1373 (2001) Alton V. HALLUM, Jr., Plaintiff, v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 1:00-CV-1159-CAP. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 10, 2001. *1375 Glenn Scott Bass, Tammy Spivack Skinner, Goldner Sommers Scrudder & Bass, Atlanta, GA, for pl
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003-04-14 · Published · cited 6× · 326 F.3d 1374; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7067; 2003 WL 1870327
PER CURIAM: In Hallum v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co., 289 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir.2002), we certified the following question to the Georgia Supreme Court: WHETHER, UNDER GEORGIA LAW, CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME, WHICH IS CAUSED BY REPETITIVE HAND MOTION, IS MORE PROPERLY CLASSIFIED AS AN “INJURY” UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF A
Dees v. Hallumpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1989-08-15 · Published · cited 6× · 721 F. Supp. 789; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10877; 1989 WL 105798
721 F.Supp. 789 (1989) Sherry DEES, Individually and as Next Friend of Her Minor Children, Trisha Doyle, Cheryl Doyle, and Charlotte Dees, Plaintiffs, v. Robert Shawn HALLUM, Diane C. Hallum, Grand Rent A Car, Inc., and Becky L. Davis, Defendants. Civ. A. No. DC 88-43-D-O. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division. August 15, 1989.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979-03-08 · Published · cited 6× · 593 F.2d 944; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16405
593 F.2d 944 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Johnny BOWLINE, Louis Butler, Curtis Hallum, Johnny Jones,Pat Leonard, and Trish Leonard, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 78-1663, 78-1664, 78-1665, 78-1667, 78-1668 and 78-1669. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Argued Jan. 23, 1979.Decided March 8, 1979.
Anderson v. Carterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902-05-28 · Published · cited 7× · 69 S.W. 78; 29 Tex. Civ. App. 240; 1902 Tex. App. LEXIS 279
This action was brought by D.J. Anderson against Mrs. J.S. Anderson and Mrs. Maggie Carter and her husband, to cancel a deed, and for title, to an undivided one-seventh interest in *Page 241 a tract of 320 acres in the Kincannon survey, and an undivided one-seventh of 87 1/2 acres adjoining the above, in the W.N. Anderson survey. The petition averred that plaintiff about September 25, 1882, executed a deed to his brother J.S. Anderson for the purpose and
Jamison v. Howardpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980-10-07 · Published · cited 5× · 271 S.E.2d 116; 275 S.C. 344; 1980 S.C. LEXIS 459
Ness, Justice (dissenting) : I dissent, adhering to the reasons set forth in my earlier dissent, in Jamison v. Howard, 271 5. C. 385, 247 S. E. (2d) 450 (1978), that Hallums was not acting within the *353scope of his employment when he ordered Morgan to shoot Jamison. I would hold Howard entitled to judgment as a matter of la
Jamison v. Howardpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978-09-14 · Published · cited 11× · 247 S.E.2d 450; 271 S.C. 385; 1978 S.C. LEXIS 346
Littlejohn, Justice (concurring) : I concur in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Lewis. The summary judgment rule is a good one and has well served courts and litigants in this state; it should, however, be used with caution. Relief granted under the summary judgment rule is more drastic than relief granted by a non-suit or by a directed verdict. In determining whethe
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-10-22 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued October 22, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00547-CV ——————————— RANDY MOORE, Appellant V. SANDRA FAYE JORDAN, Appe
District Court, S.D. New York · 2006-10-26 · Published · cited 3× · 461 F. Supp. 2d 142; 98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7566; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78511; 2006 WL 3059965
461 F.Supp.2d 142 (2006) Manfred REIFF Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 05 CIV. 6855 CM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 26, 2006. *143 *144 Hugh Janow, Law Offices of Hugh Janow LLC, Pearl River, NY, for Plaintiff. Melanie Robin Hallums, U.S.
Bonds v. Huntpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010-05-12 · Published · cited 3× · 379 S.W.3d 57; 2010 Ark. App. 415; 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 419
M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge. | ¶ This is a contract case in which the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee Fred Hunt. Bobby Bonds and Image Homes, Inc., appeal, arguing the following points for reversal: (1) the trial court erred in holding that the parties had entered into a contract; (2) the trial court erred when it pierced the corporate veil to hold Bonds individually li
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
07/12/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 25, 2022 Session CHARLES HYATT v. ADENUS GROUP, LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 2019-CV-48635 Joseph A. Woodruff, Judge
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010-01-29 · Published · cited 5× · 303 S.W.3d 492; 2010 Ky. App. LEXIS 25; 2010 WL 323196
303 S.W.3d 492 (2010) Stephen PIERCY, Sr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. No. 2008-CA-002068-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. January 29, 2010. *493 Rob Eggert, Louisville, KY, for appellant. Jack Conway, Attorney General, M. Brandon Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Frankfort, KY, for Appellee.
May v. Bontapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-09-06 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASON WOLFORD; ALISON No. 23-16164 WOLFORD; ATOM KASPRZYCKI; HAWAII FIREARMS COALITION, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00265- Plaintiffs-Appellees, LEK-WRP v. OPINION ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii,
Ernst v. Hinchliffpublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015-09-08 · Published · cited 24× · 129 F. Supp. 3d 695; 2015 WL 5255322
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Objection to. Recommendation to Dismiss (“Objections”) [Doc,. No. 76]. to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung’s July 15, 2015 Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [Doc. No. 75] granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 13, 18, 30, 40], dismissing the State of Minnesota and the D
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0945 Submitted September 16, 2021—Filed June 30, 2022 Amended July 22, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. STANLEY LIGGINS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Marlita A. Greve, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction for first-degree murder after his fourth retrial. Defendant seeks a new trial or dis
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0945 Submitted September 16, 2021—Filed June 30, 2022 Amended September 30, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. STANLEY LIGGINS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Marlita A. Greve, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction for first-degree murder after his fourth retrial. Defendant seeks a new trial or di