Cases

CHARLES W. CARTER, JR.,[1] Petitioner/Respondent Below, Appellant, v. DEBORAH Y. BLAKE, Respondent/Petitioner Below, Appellee. No. 277, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: December 18, 2009. Decided: March 10, 2010. Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY, Justices. ORDER MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice. This 10th

PER CURIAM. William Carter appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for post-judgment relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered November 30, 1976 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondents to award petitioners a contract upon which they were low bidders. The Town of Plattsburgh advertised in the newspaper on July 19, 1976 for bids to pave a number of roads in the town. The advertisement included a provision that the town board reser

*875 BARKER, District Judge. This appeal brought by Petitioner Byron Blake (“Blake”) seeks our review of the district court’s denial of his habeas petition, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to challenge his convictions and sentence. Blake’s primary legal issue is that each of his three (actually four)

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. A concertgoer who was injured when an off-duty police officer lifted him over a five-foot barrier and dropped him on his neck asks us to reverse the district court's 1 order granting summary judgment to the officer and the board of police commissioners on his

208 S.W.3d 693 (2006) James Ray BLAKE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-06-00058-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted October 4, 2006. Decided October 19, 2006. *694 David A. Pearson, IV, Fort Worth, for appellant. Deborah Moore, Asst. County Atty., Gary D. Young, Dist. Att

860 N.E.2d 625 (2007) Ronald Lee BLAKE, Jr., Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0605-CR-369. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 24, 2007. Ronald Lee Blake, Jr., Wethersfield, CT, Appellant, pro se. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Scott L. Barnhart, Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appell

ORDER JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Ray Robert alleges that Defendants Douglas G. Carter, the Hamilton County Council and the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners (“Defendants”) failed to exempt him from TASER training or to provide him a reasonable accommodation in violation of his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). He further claims tha

*872OPINION HOOTEN, Judge Appellant former employer challenges the district court’s order dismissing its amended complaint, arguing that the district court erred by failing to award a remedy, specifically injunctive relief, after a jury and the district court found that appellant’s former employee breached the noncompete provision of his employment co

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and oral arguments before the Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modi

NO. 07-02-0174-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 16, 2002 ______________________________ KARLA L. CARTER A

NO. 07-02-0174-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 16, 2002 ______________________________ KARLA L. CARTER AND DOUGLAS E. CARTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR BLAKE D. CARTER, APPELLANTS

NO. 07-02-0174-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 16, 2002 ______________________________ KARLA L. CARTER AND DOUGLAS E. CARTER, IND

2022 IL App (2d) 210154 No. 2-21-0154 Opinion filed October 18, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STAT

INTRODUCTION JOHNSON, District Judge. Since 1979, plaintiff Ernestine Blake has filed a total of twelve administrative complaints and eight discrimination suits against her employer, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). A careful review of the record shows that Blake has repeatedly failed to allege any action by her employer that amounts to unlawful discrimination. Blake’s complaints include: “assault” by a

09/24/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 3, 2024 MICHAEL HALLIBURTON v. BLAKE BALLIN, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-2948-20 Gina C. Higgins, Judge _________

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of December 2006 by NC Press Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of December 2006."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of October 2006 by NC Hospital Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of October 2006."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of October 2006 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Carter-Hubbard Publishing) shall have up to and including the 4th day of December 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 31st day of October 2006."

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2291 RICHARD WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLAKE WOODS and ALFONSO DAVID, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the