Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carter Rodney Fore”
Pinkney Carter v. State of Floridapublic domain
PER CURIAM. Pinkney Carter appeals from an order denying a motion to vacate three judgments of conviction of first-degree murder and two sentences of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Because the order concerns postconviction relief from capital convictions for which sentences of death were imposed, this Court has jurisdiction of the appeal under article V, sec
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Avalos v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-2008 Document: 98 Page: 1 Filed: 11/30/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ELEAZAR AVALOS, JAMES DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2021-2008 ______________________
Robert Bellafant v. Statepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED MARCH SESSION , 1998 May 15, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson ROBERT C. BELLAFANT, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9705-CC-00183 ) Appe llant, ) )
Nicole Harris v. Sheryl Thompsonpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 12-1088 N ICOLE H ARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S HERYL T HOMPSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 10 CV 6257—Ja
Eizember v. Statepublic domain
OPINION LUMPKIN, P.J. T1 Appellant Scott James Eizember was tried by jury and convicted of Second Degree Felony Murder (Count I) (21 0.8.2001, § TOL8(2)); First Degree Malice Murder (Count II) (21 0.8.2001, § 701.7(A)); Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (Count III) (21 0.98.2001, $ 645); Shooting with Intent to Kill (Count IV) @1 0.8. 2001, § 652); First Degree Burglary (Count V) (21 0.8.2001, § 14
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of
United States v. Espinosapublic domain
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge. This is a timely consolidated appeal brought by ten defendants who were convicted after a jury trial on two counts of an indictment charging possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2.1 The defendants were all sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The
Wells v. Liddypublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT IDA MAXWELL WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 98-1962 G. GORDON LIDDY, Defendant-Appellee, PHILLIP MACKIN BAILLEY, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-946-JFM) Argued: March 3, 1999 Decided: July 28, 1999 Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges,
People v. Bankstonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY GEORGE BANKSTON, Defendant and Appellant. S044739 Los Angeles County Superior Court VA007955 June 1, 2026 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero
United States v. Keith McGillpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM: In November 2000, a grand jury returned a 158-count superseding indictment against sixteen defendants. The indictment alleged that, during the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, those defendants conspired to run a large-scale and violent nareotics-distribution business centered in Washington, D.C. The de
Julian v. Kansas City Star Co.public domain
SEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION. GANTT, C. J. We concur in Judge Valliant’s opinion but desire to add that in our opinion defendant waived the jurisdiction as to its person. That the Platte Circuit Court had jurisdiction of libel causes is of course conceded. One of the pivotal questions discussed by our brethren who have formulated the majority and the minority views of the court is, did the circuit court of Pl
George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaiipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEORGE K. YOUNG, JR., No. 12-17808 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:12-cv-00336- HG-BMK STATE OF HAWAII; NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; OPINION DAVID MARK LOUIE I, Esquire, in his capacity as State Attor
United States v. Polouizzipublic domain
687 F.Supp.2d 133 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. Peter POLOUIZZI, Defendant. No. 06-CR-22 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 20, 2010. As Amended February 11, 2010. *135 Allen Lee Bode, United States Attorneys Office, Central Islip, NY, Andrea Goldbarg, United States Attorneys Office
NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Abshirepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti
in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytlepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2
John T. Preston and C Change Investments, LLC v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltzpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS